Skip to main content

The Empirical Investigation of Citizens’ Preferences with Respect to Four Energy Scenarios

  • Conference paper
Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIG,volume 4))

  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

“How can polarized social conflict involving risk be reduced and replaced by an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect among the opposing parties? What research is needed to design an environment in which effective multiway communication, constructive debate, and compromise can take place?” (1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, and D. MacGregor, “Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications,” Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Les Arcs, France, August 21–31, 1983 (Manuscript from Decision Research, A Branch of Perceptronics, 1201 Oak Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Renn, “Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung in Spannungsfeld von Wertwandel and Legitimationskrise,” in Perspektiven angewandter Sozialforschung, H. Klages, ed. (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Albrecht, H. U. Stegelmann (eds): Bilanz der Energieversorgung (High-Tech Verlag, Munchen), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. C. Dienel, Die Planungszelle ( Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. U. von Alemann, Partizipation — Demokratisierung - Mitbestimmung (2 edition, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. von Alemann, Partizipation — Demokratisierung - Mitbestimmung (2 edition, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Siebenborn and H. Nehm, Die Planungszelle — Eine Form der Bürgerpartizipation, Der Städtetag, 7 (1980), pp. 398–402.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. G. Stillwell, D. von Winterfeldt, and R. S. John, Value Tree Analysis of Energy Supply Alternatives (Technical Report SSR1 81-2, Social Science Research Centre, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (1981) or O. Renn. “Man, Technology and Risk,” (Jül-Spez-115, Report of the Nuclear Research Centre, Julich, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Renn, O., Stegelmann, H.U., Albrecht, G., Kotte, U. (1985). The Empirical Investigation of Citizens’ Preferences with Respect to Four Energy Scenarios. In: Covello, V.T., Mumpower, J.L., Stallen, P.J.M., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis. NATO ASI Series, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70636-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70634-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics