Abstract
A major step in the evaluation of technologies, and policies concerning technologies, is often the development of scenarios describing possible futures under various conditions. The notion of scenario was introduced for military planning by Herman Kahn while at RAND Corporation in the 1950s. Since then, the scenario method has been applied in many areas of long-range policymaking. Typical examples are scenarios for U.S. agricultural policy (1), environmental policy (2), world energy supply strategy (3), helium storage policy (4), climate change (5), or aviation communications technology (6). A recent example are the four scenarios for energy policy in West Germany, developed by a Temporary Committee of the German Parliament. These scenarios describe alternative energy policy options for the next 50 years and represent a wide range of expectations, assumptions, goals, and values with respect to, for instance, population growth, lifestyle changes, economic growth, change of economic structure, and availability of energy resources and technologies for their transformation (7).
A number of ideas expressed in this paper originated in discussions with Detlof von Winterfeldt. I would also like to thank Friedrich Fleischer. Lutz Hausmann, and Michael Lugtenburg for their contributions and Comments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Stanford Research Institute. Center for the Study of Social Policy (SRI/CSSP), Handbook of Forecasting Techniques. Prepared for Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, VA (1975).
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Alternative Futures for Environmental Policy Planning: 1975-2000 ( Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 ).
Häfele, W., IIASA’s World regional energy modelling. Futures, 12, 18–34 (1980).
Epple, D. and Lave, L.B., Helium: Investments in the future, The Bell Journal of Economics (1980).
Epple, D. and Lave, L.B., Planning for climate change, Methodology of Climate Impact Assessment (Scope, 1981 ).
Chen, K., Jarboe, K., and Wolfe, J., Long range scenario construction for technology assessment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20, 27–40 (1981).
Deutscher Bundestag, Bericht der Enguête Kommission Zukünftige Kernenergiepolitik: Drucksache 8/4341 ( Bonn, Presse- und Informations-zentrum, 1980 ).
Häfele, W., Hypotheticality and the new challenges: The pathfinder role of nuclear energy, Minerva, 12, 303–322 (1974).
Ducot, C. and Lubben, H.J., A typology for scenarios, Futures, 12, 51–57 (1980).
Keeney, R.L., Siting Energy Facilities ( New York, Academic Press, 1980 ).
Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis ( Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1968 ).
Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs ( New York, Wiley, 1976 ).
Mitchell, R.B., Tydeman, J., and Georgiades, J., Structuring the future — application of a scenario-generation procedure, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 14, 409–428 (1979).
Lippold, H. and Welters, K., Szenario-Technik ( Berlin, Zentrum Berlin fur Zukunftsforschung. 1976 ).
Osborn, A.F., Applied Imagination ( New York, Scribner, 1953 ).
Gordon, W.J.J., Svnectics ( New York, Harper amp; Row, 1961 ).
Stein, M.I., Stimulating Creativity, Vol.I,II ( New York, Academic Press, 1974, 1975 )
Linstone, H.A. and Turoff, M., The Delphi-Method: Technigues and Applications ( Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1975 ).
Sutherland, J.W., Architecting the future: A Delphi-based paradigm for normative system building, in H.A. Linstone and M. Turoff, eds., The Delphi-Method: Technigues and Applications ( London, Addison-Wesley, 1975 ).
Moore, L. and Clayton, E., GERT Modeling and Simulation ( New York, Petrocelli, 1976 ).
Mitchell, R.B., Tydeman, J., and Georgiades, J., Structuring the future — application of a scenario-generation procedure, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 14, 409–428 (1979).
Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P., Scripts, Goals, Plans and Understanding ( Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977 ).
Bower, G.H., Black, J., and Turner, T., Scripts in text comprehension and memory, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220 (1979).
Gettys, C.F., Manning, C., Mehle, T., and Fisher, S., Hypothesis generation: A final report of three years of research, Technical Report 15-10-80 ( Norman, OK, University of Oklahoma, 1980 ).
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232 (1973).
Combs, B. and Slovic. P., Causes of Death: Biased newspaper coverage and biased judgments, Journalism Quarterly, 56, 837–843 (1979).
Hogarth, R., Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision ( Chichester, etc., Wiley, 1980 ).
Paschen, H., Summary and evaluation of the results of the symposium “Internationales Symposium über die Rolle der Technologiefolgenabschätzung im Entscheidungsprozeβ”, 19.–21. Oktober 1982 in Bonn ( Berlin, Umweltbundesamt, 1983 ).
Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F., A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory, Psychological Review, 82, 407–428 (1975).
Pitz, G.F., Sachs. N.J., and Heerboth. J., Procedures for eliciting choices in the analysis of individual decisions, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 396–408 (1980).
Jungermann, H., von Ulardt. I., and Hausmann. L., The role of the goal for generating actions, in P.C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, and A. Vari, eds., Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes (Amsterdam, Budapest, North-Holland/Hungarian Academic Press, 1983 ).
Humphreys, P., Value structures underlying risk assessment, in H. Kunreuther, ed., Risk: A Seminar Series ( Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1981 ).
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., The simulation heuristic, in D. Kahneman. P. Slovic. and A. Tversky, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases ( Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press, 1982 ).
Einhorn, H.J. and Hogarth, R.M., Prediction, diagnosis, and causal thinking in forecasting, Journal of Forecasting, 1, 1–14 (1982).
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty, in M. Fishbein, ed., Progress in Social Psychology ( Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980 ).
Jungermann, H. and von Winterfeldt, D., Cognitive aspects and analytical methods of risk identification: The construction of scenarios, in H. Jungermann, D. von Winterfeldt and R. Coppock, Analysis, Evaluation and Acceptability of Hazardous Technologies and their Risks: A Workshop Report, IIES-dp 82 - 2 ( Berlin, Internationales Institut fur Umwelt und Gesellschaft, 1982 ).
Janis, I.L., Victims of Groupthink ( Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1972 ).
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science, 211, 1453–1458 (1981).
Edwards, W., Guttentag, M., and Snapper, K., Effective evaluation: A decision theoretic approach. In M. Guttentag (ed.), Handbook of evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jungermann, H. (1985). Psychological Aspects of Scenarios. In: Covello, V.T., Mumpower, J.L., Stallen, P.J.M., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis. NATO ASI Series, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70636-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70634-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive