“Who’s Afraid of Technological Risk?”: An Attempt to Model Reasonable Emotions
Toxicologists typically distinguish three levels of exposure — acute, chronic and subchronic. Toxicological knowledge of these levels differs considerably. We know quite a lot about acute exposures but much less about chronic poisoning, particularly in cases not connected with occupational hazards. We know virtually nothing about subchronic exposures.
KeywordsEnvironmental Impact Assessment Appraisal Threat Nuclear Regulatory Commission Technological Risk Subchronic Exposure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982), Risk and culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Edelstein, M.R. (1982), The Social and Psychological Impacts of Groundwater Contamination in the Legler section of Jackson. Ramapo College, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Erikson, K., (1976), Loss of Communality at Buffalo Creek, Amer. J. Psychiatr., 133, 302–305.Google Scholar
- Hohenemser, C., Kasperson, K.E., Kates, R.W. (1982), “Causal Structure: A Framework for Policy Analysis,” in Hohenemser, C. and Kasperson, J.X. (eds.), Risk in the technological society. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Janis, I. and Mann, L. (1977), Decision Making, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Levine, A., (1982), Love canal: Science, Politics, and people. Lexington Books: New York.Google Scholar
- Stallen, P.J.M. & Tomas. A. (1983), “Psychological risk: The Assessment of Threat and Control,” in Ricci, P. Sagan, P. and Whipple, C. (eds.), Technological Risk Assessment, Sijthoff: Den Haag.Google Scholar
- Wagenaar, W.A. (1983), Menseliik Falen, Rijksuniversiteit, Leiden ( Inaugural Address, Feb. 11, 1983 ).Google Scholar
- Zielhuis, R.L., (1980) “Van represseif naar preventief onderzoek,” T. Soc. Geneesk., 58, 381–388.Google Scholar