Toxicity Testing of Mineral Dusts. Past. Present. Future
Our industrial world is responsible for the emission of a great amount of respirable mineral dusts, either natural or artificially produced. This dust emission has become increasingly an important health problem, particularly in places of work where specific dusts were found to be responsible for severe lung diseases: silicosis, coal miner’s pneumoconiosis, berylliosis, hard metal lung fibrosis and asbestos-related diseases. Asbestos and other fibrous dusts are presently a major concern because of their carcinogenic potential [1,2].
KeywordsToxicity Dioxide Dust Lymphoma Pyrene
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- (1).Occupational Lung Disorders. Second Edition. Parkes WR (ed). Butterworths, 1932, p529Google Scholar
- (2).Asbestos and Disease. Selikoff IJ and Lee PHK (eds). Academic Press, New York, 1978Google Scholar
- (4).Pott F, Friedrichs KH and Huth F. Results of animals experiments concerning the carcinogenic effect of fibrous dusts and their interpretation with regard to the carcinogenis in human. Zbl Bakt Hyg I, Abt. Orig. 1976, 162: 467–505Google Scholar
- (7).The In Vitro Effects of Mineral Dusts. Brown RC, Gormley IP, Chamberlain M, and Davies R (eds). Academic Press, 1980, p373Google Scholar
- (8).In Vitro Effects of Mineral Dusts. Environ Health Perspect 1983, 51, p396Google Scholar
- (14).Beck EG, Hold PF and Nasrallah ET. Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures. Br J Industr Med 1971, 28: 179–185Google Scholar
- (18).Jaurand MC, Bastie Sigeac I, Bignon J and Stoebner P. Effect of chrysotile and crocidolite on the morphology and grown of rat pleural mesothelial cells. Environ Res 1983, 30: 255–269Google Scholar