Gap Detection in Normal and Impaired Listeners: The Effect of Level and Frequency

  • Søren Buus
  • Mary Florentine
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)

Abstract

Temporal summation and temporal resolution are often thought to be different aspects of the same integration process. However, a long integration time is required to optimize performance in a temporal summation task, whereas a short integration time is required to optimize performance in a temporal resolution task. Indeed, the integration times found in temporal summation experiments are typically one-to-two orders of magnitude larger than those found in temporal resolution experiments (for review, see Green, this volume, see also de Boer, this volume). It is possible to reconcile this large difference either by assuming that a compressive nonlinear transformation (Divenyi and Shannon 1983) or neural adaptation (Irwin and Kemp 1976; Irwin and Purdy 1982) takes place prior to integration, but in this paper we implicitly treat the two integration processes as separate by considering only temporal resolution and the corresponding short integration time.

Keywords

Titan Acoustics Univer 350D Olid 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANSI (1969) American National Standards Institute. Specifications for Audiometers. S3.6–1969. American National Standards Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Boer E de (1959) Measurement of the critical bandwidth in cases of perception deafness. Proceedings 3rd International Congress of Acoustics. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 100–102Google Scholar
  3. Boothroyd A (1973) Detection of temporal gaps by deaf and hearing subjects. (SARP NO. 12). Clarke School for the Deaf, Northampton.Google Scholar
  4. Buunen TJF, van Valkenburg DA (1979) Auditory detection of a single gap in noise. J Acoust Soc Amer 65:534–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buus S, Florentine M (1982) Detection of a temporal gap as a function of level and frequency. J Acoust Soc Amer 72 (Suppl. 1), S89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell RA (1963) Detection of a noise signal of varying duration. J Acoust Soc Amer 35:1732–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cudahy EA (1977) Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Paper presented to the American Speech and Hearing Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Divenyi P, Shannon RV (1983) Auditory time constants unified. J Acoust Soc Amer 74 (Suppl. 1) S10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duifhuis H (1972) Perceptual analysis of sound. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Technology, Eindhoven, HollandGoogle Scholar
  10. Duifhuis H (1973) Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. J Acoust Soc Amer 54:1471–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzgibbons P (1979) Temporal resolution in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Fitzgibbons P (1983) Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. J Acoust Soc Amer 74:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzgibbons P (1984a) Tracking a temporal gap in band-limited noise: Frequency and level effects. Perception & Psychophysics 35:446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzgibbons P (1984b) Temporal gap resolution in masked normal ears as a function of masker level. J Acoust Soc Amer 76:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgibbons P, Wightman FL (1982) Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Amer 72:761–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Florentine M, Buus S (1982) Is the detection of a temporal gap frequency dependent?. J Acoust Soc Amer 71 (Suppl. 1) S48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Florentine M, Buus S (1983) Temporal resolution as a function of level and frequency. Proceedings 11th International Congress of Acoustics 3:103–106Google Scholar
  18. Florentine M, Buus S (1984) Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairment. J Speech & Hearing Research 27:449–455Google Scholar
  19. Florentine M, Buus S, Scharf B, Zwicker E (1980) Frequency selectivity in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech & Hearing Research 23:646–669Google Scholar
  20. Giraudi-Perry DM, Salvi RJ, Henderson D (1982) Gap detection in hearing-impaired chinchillas. J Acoust Soc Amer 72:1387–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green DM (1973) Temporal acuity as a function of frequency. J Acoust Soc Amer 54:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green DM, Shelton BR, Picardi MC, Hafter ER (1981) Psychophysical tuning curves independent of signal level. J Acoust Soc Amer 69:1758–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hellman R, Scharf B (1984) Acoustic reflex and loudness. In The Acoustic Reflex: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (ed Silam S). Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Irwin RJ, Hinchcliff LK, Kemp S (1981) Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 20:234–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irwin RJ, Kemp S (1976) Temporal summation and decay in hearing. J Acoust Soc Amer 59:920–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irwin RJ, Purdy SC (1982) The minimum detectable duration of auditory signals for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Amer 71:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR (1983) Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. J Acoust Soc Am 74:750–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Munson WA (1947) The growth of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Amer 19:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Penner MJ (1975) Persistence and integration: Two consequences of a sliding integrator. Perception & Psychophysics 18:114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. See also Penner MJ (1976) Erratum. Perception & Psychophysics 19:469–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Penner MJ (1977) Detection of temporal gaps in noise as a measure of the decay of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am 61:552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plomp R (1964) Rate of decay of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am 36:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scharf B (1970) Critical Bands. In Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory Vol 1 (ed. Tobias JV) pp 157–202. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Scharf B, Buus S (in press) Audition I. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (ed. Boff KR). John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Scharf B, Hellman RP (1966) A model of loudness summation applied to impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 40:71–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shailer MJ, Moore BCJ (1983) Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. J Acoust Soc Am 74:467–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinberg JC, Gardner MB (1937) The dependence of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 9:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tyler RS, Summerfield Q, Wood EJ, Fernandes MA (1982) Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 72:740–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zwicker E (1961) Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). J Acoust Soc Am 33:248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zwicker E, Feldtkeller R (1967) Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger. S Hirzel Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  41. Zwicker E, Wright HN (1963) Temporal summation for tones in narrow-band noise. J Acoust Soc Am 35:691–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zwislocki JJ (1969) Temporal summation of loudness: An analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 46:431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Søren Buus
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mary Florentine
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Laboratory of PsychophysicsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychology (413MU)Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Communication Research Laboratory (133FR)Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations