The Production and Utilization of Lignocellulose

  • P. Broda
Conference paper
Part of the Dahlem Workshop Reports book series (DAHLEM, volume 35)


Many poorer countries depend for energy and chemicals for development upon renewable resources. Biotechnology has a part to play in improving production of biomass and in possible processes for its conversion to fuels and chemical feedstocks. Economic, political, social, and environmental considerations as well as scientific and technological advances will determine how much progress is made. Although there is a diversity of materials, ranging from wood and sugarcane bagasse to municipal solid waste and animal waste, there are some unifying features. There is the need to understand the biological attack of lignin and of crystalline cellulose and the design of processes such as solid-substrate fermentations that would be applicable to developing countries.


Municipal Solid Waste Corn Stover Sugarcane Bagasse Crystalline Cellulose Lignin Degradation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Biomass Panel of the Energy Research Advisory Board. 1983. Biomass energy. Solar Energy 30: 1–31.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Crawford, D.L. 1978. Lignocellulose decomposition by selected Streptomyces strains. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 35: 1041–1045.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Hagerdal, B.; Ferchak, J.D.; and Pye, K.E. 1978. Cellulolytic enzyme system of Thermoactinomyces sp. grown on microcrystalline cellulose. Appli. Envir. Microbiol. 36: 606–612.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Hall, D.O.; Bernard, G.W.; and Moss, P.A. 1983. Biomass for Energy in the Developing Countries. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Hartley, B.S., and Payton, M.A. 1983. Industrial prospects for thermophiles and thermophilic enzymes. In Biochemical Society Symposium on Biotechnology, eds. C.F. Phelps and P.H. Clarke, vol. 48, pp. 133–146. London: The Biochemical Society.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Janshekar, H., and Fiechter, A. 1978. Lignin: biosynthesis, application and breakdown. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 27: 119–178.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Kerr, T.J.; Windham, W.R.; and Benner, R. 1984. Chemical and bacterial pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials to increase ruminant digestibility. Biotechnology 2: 805–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Liwicki, R.; Paterson, A.; MacDonald, M.J.; and Broda, P. 1986. Phenotypic classes of phenol oxidase-negative mutants of the lignin- degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J. Bacteriol. 162, in press.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    MacDonald, M.J.; Paterson, A.; and Broda, P. 1984. A possible relationship between cyclic AMP and idiophasic metabolism in the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J. Bacteriol. 160: 470–472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Mandels, M. 1981. Enzymatic conversion of cellulosic biomass: a viable alternative to ethanol from grain? Am. Soc. Microbiol. News 47: 174–178.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    McCarthy, A.J., and Broda, P. 1984. Screening for lignin-degrading actinomycetes and characterisation of their activity against [14C]- lignin-labelled wheat lignocellulose. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130: 2905–2913.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Montencourt, B.S. 1983. Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Trends Biotechnol. 1: 156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Oliver, S.G. 1984. Economic possibilities for fuel alcohol. Chem. Ind. 18th June: 425–427.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Powledge, T.M. 1984. Biotechnology touches the forest. Biotechnol. 2: 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals held in Gatlinburg, Tennessee, May 10–13, 1983, ed. C.D. Scott. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Supplement 13.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Rothman, H.; Greenshields, R.; and Rosillo Calle, F. 1983. The Alcohol Economy: Fuel Ethanol and the Brazilian Experience. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Russell, J.A.; Molton, P.M.; and Landsman, S.D. 1983. Chemical comparisons of liquid fuel produced by thermochemical liquefaction of various biomass materials. Altern. Energy Sour. 3: 307–322.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Saddler, J.N.; Yu, E.K.C.; Mes-Howtree, M.; Levitin, N.; and Brownell, H.H. 1983. Utilisation of enzymatically hydrolysed wood hemicellu-loses by microorganisms for production of liquid fuels. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 45: 153–160.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Skotnicki, M.L.; Warr, R.G.; Goodman, A.E.; Lee, K.J.; and Rogers, P.L. 1983. High-productivity alcohol fermentations using Zymomonas mobilis. In Biochemical Society Symposium on Biotechnology, eds. C. F. Phelps and P.H. Clarke, vol. 48, pp. 53–86.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Tautorus, T.E., and Townsley, P.M. 1984. Biotechnology in commercial mushroom fermentation. Biotechnology 2: 696–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Tien, M., and Kirk, T.K. 1983. Lignin-degrading enzyme from the hymenomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds. Science 222: 661–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. S. Bernhard, Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Broda
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Biochemistry and Applied Molecular BiologyUniversity of Manchester Institute of Science and TechnologyManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations