Contextual Coding in Memory: Studies of Remembered Duration

  • Richard A. Block

Abstract

Two metatheories have dominated psychological studies of memory and of time during this century. Although the historical pattern of adoption of these metatheoretical approaches overlaps somewhat, one of them is clearly older. The older metatheory has roots in the behavioristic and neobehavioristic psychology of the earlier part of this century, but it extends it; branches into some recent information processing psychology. I refer to this as a stimulus-based approach, because it emphasizes memory for stimulus events per se.The newer metatheory originates in some cognitive psychology of the later part of this century. I refer to this as a context-based approach, because it emphasizes contextual coding in memory.

Keywords

Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, R. A. Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, R. A. Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, R. A. Time and consciousness. In: G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness: Vol. 1. Psychological issues. London: Academic Press, 1979, pp. 179–217.Google Scholar
  4. Block, R.A. Temporal judgments and contextual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982, 8, 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, R. A., George, E. J., & Reed, M. A. A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 1980, 46, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Block, R. A., & Reed, M. A. Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978, 4, 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bransford, J. D. Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Estes, W. K. Is human memory obsolete? American Scientist, 1980, 68, 62–69.Google Scholar
  9. Fraisse, R Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 1984, 35, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffman, R. R., & Nead, J. M. General contextualism, ecological science and cognitive research. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1983, 4, 507–560.Google Scholar
  11. Jenkins, J. J. Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins, J.J. Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In: L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979, pp. 429–446.Google Scholar
  13. Ornstein, R. E. On the experience of time. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Pepper, S. C. World hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1942.Google Scholar
  15. Poynter, W. D. Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience. Memory & Cognition, 1983, 11, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Underwood, B.J. Temporal codes for memories: Issues and problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Underwood, G. Attention and the perception of duration during encoding and retrieval. Perception, 1975, 4, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vroon, PA. Effects of presented and processed information on duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 1910, 34, 115–121.Google Scholar

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Block, R. A. Remembered duration: Imagery processes and contextual encoding. Manuscript in preparation, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Block

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations