Advertisement

Organizational Consequences of the Use of EDP — How to Design Information Technology

  • Hanns-Wilhelm Heibey
  • Bernd Lutterbeck
  • Michael Töpel
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP State-of-the-Art Reports book series (IFIP)

Abstract

The discussion about the technological progress is increasingly held in a critical manner. Expecially the broad expansion of information technologies has caused impacts, which by no means have been approved by all applying or afflicted people. For a long time the analysis of these phenomena was only made by a few, mostly interdisciplinary research groups. In the meantime the necessity of work in this field has been reflected in research policy. The so- called impact research in the field of information technologies was officially initiated in different European countries. Here we mention the German study [17], French studies (see [6], [16]) and a British study [2]. All these studies are surveys and attempts to show potential future developments and their risks in a prospective and theoretical way. In the Federal Republic of Germany these studies had some predecessors which dealt empirically with the impacts of EDP use in organizations. Here we have to mention the important work of Kubicek (see [13], [14]), which helped to reintegrate the human requirements and interests into the science of organizations and industrial management. The Research Group on Automation in Public Administration in Kassel (see [10], [15]) has analysed strategies and mechanisms of impacts of automation in public administrations.

Keywords

Technological Design Technological Requirement Impact Research Organizational Task Undesirable Impact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ackhoff, R.: Management Misinformation Systems. Management Science 14, 147–156 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Barrow, I.; Curnow, R.C.: The Future of Information Technology. Internal Report of Social Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton 1978Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Brauer, W.; Haacke, W.; Münch, S.: Studien- und Forschungsführer Informatik. GMD/DAAD Bonn/Bad Godesberg 1978Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Brinckmann, H.: Verwaltungsgliederung als Schranke von Planungs- und Informationsverbund. ÖVD 5, 239–248 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Brinckmann, H.; Grimmer, K.; Lenk, K.; Rave, D.: Verwaltungsautomation. Darmstadt: S. Toeche-Mittler 1974Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Danzin, A.: Die gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen der Datenverarbeitung. Birlinghoven: GMD-Eigenverlag 1978Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dehning, W.; Essig, H.; Maaß, S.: Zur Anpassung virtueller Mensch-Rechner-Schnittstellen an Benutzererfordernisse im Dialog - dargestellt am Beispiel von Datenbanksystemen. Report of the Department of Computer Science of the University of Hamburg, IfI-HH-B-50/78, 1978Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dehning, W.; Maaß, S.: Kommunikative Aspekte der Mensch- Computer-Interaktion. Note of the Department of Computer Science of the University of Hamburg, IfI-HH-M-43/77, 1977Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Fjalestad, J.; Pape, A.: Social Impacts of Information Technology, Norwegian Strategies for Research. Lecture of the Conference on Social Impacts of Information Technology, Schloß Birlinghoven, 1978Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Forschungsgruppe Verwaltungsautomation: Forschungsberichte, 11 Volumes. Gesamthochschule Kassel: Eigenverlag 1975–1978Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Heibey, H.-W.; Kühn, M.; Lutterbeck, B.; Töpel, M.: Technologische Gestaltung der Mensch-Computer-Schnittstellen. Report of the Department of Computer Science of the University of Hamburg, Ifl-HH-B -61/79, 1979Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Heibey, H.-W., Lutterbeck, B.; Töpel, M.: Auswirkungen der elektrischen Datenverarbeitung in Organisationen. Research Report DV 77–01 of the German Secretary of Research and Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen: Centrum of Nuclear Power-Documentation 1977Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kubicek, H.: Informationstechnologie und organisatorische Regelungen. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot 1975Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kubicek, H.: Humanisierung des DV-Gestützten Büros durch partizipative Systemgestaltung. Angewandte Informatik 8/78, 331–342 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Lucas, H.-C., jr.: Why Information Systems Fail. New York- London: Columbia University Press 1975Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Nora, S.; Mine, A: L1informatisation de la société. Rapport a M. le President de la Republique. Paris: La Documentation Française 1978Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Reese, J.; Kubicek, H; Lange, B.P.; Lutterbeck, B; Reese, U. Bestandsaufnähme der Wirkungsforschung im Bereich Informationstechnologie, Final Report with 2 additional volumes, Institut für Planungs- und Entscheidungssysteme of GMD, Bonn-Birlinghoven: Eigenverlag 1978Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanns-Wilhelm Heibey
    • 1
  • Bernd Lutterbeck
    • 2
  • Michael Töpel
    • 3
  1. 1.Der Berliner DatenschutzbeauftragteBerlin 31Germany
  2. 2.Fachbereich 20 — Informatik, Sekretariat FR 5-10TU-BerlinBerlin 10Germany
  3. 3.BuxtehudeGermany

Personalised recommendations