Festigkeitsuntersuchungen an Gesteinen und an Gesteinsverbänden mit dem Prallhammer nach Schmidt

  • E. Krauter
  • H. Woszidlo
  • H. Büdinger


The objective of this research program was to verify whether the rebound hammer SCHMIDT system is appropriate to furnish index-figures for the valuation of rock strength in situ.

For many years the rebound hammer has been used for testing and Controlling concrete constructions. After a suitable method for field tests had been worked out — the regulations according to DIN 1048 part 2 and 4 had proved to be unsatisfactory in field work — an easy portable coredrilling machine was constructed in order to receive adequate samples for comparative compressive strength tests. It appears that there is a good correlation between the rebound values gained in field work and the results of the uniaxial compressive strength tests. The test result received by rebound measurements is called “Prellhärte” (rebound hardness).

Further examinations were extended to cores. Please note that the cores always are fixed identically for the rebound tests.

Following preliminary tests a portable clamping device was developed. The examinations performed in that way principally provided the same interdependences between rock strength and rebound values as the testing in situ did.

Subsequently, it was tested whether a loss in rock strength resulting from weathering of rock formations can be identified by rebound hammer tests.

Measurement profiles in the Devonian beds of the “Rheinische Schiefergebirge” in the “German Buntsandstein” and in the “Rotliegende” were taken and interpreted. Five measurement points marked in a distance of 20 cm each are combined to one measurement value (1m total).

It turned out that a continuous reduction of the rebound values can be observed from the unweathered to the completely weathered parts in slight-ly jointed, more or less homogeneous rock formations. Even in those cases where the reduction of rock strength leads to an increase in decomposition, the intensity of this process is reflected in the index-figures.

Concerning future proceedings there is the possibility to use these index-figures to classify differently weathered rocks (in Germany DIN 18 300).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Backhaus E (1963) Der Betonprüfhammer als Hilfsmittel zur Bestimmung der relativen Festigkeit bei Sedimentgesteinen. Geol Mitt Bd 3: 143–152, AachenGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice. Rock Mechanics Vol 10: 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borges E (1965) Meßverfahren zur Beurteilung mechanischer Gewinnungsmöglichkeiten für die Planung und Überwachung von Bergbaubetrieben mit Hilfe des Betonprüfhammers System Schmidt Typ N. Dissertation TH AachenGoogle Scholar
  4. Büdinger H (1982) Untersuchungen von Gesteinsfestigkeiten — in Abhängigkeit von Stratigraphie und Petrographie — mit Hilfe von Feld- und Laborarbeiten. Diplomarbeit, Inst f Geowiss, Universität Mainz (unveröff )Google Scholar
  5. Hucka V (1965) A Rapid Method of Determination the Strength of Rock In Situ. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sei Vol 2: 127–134, Pergamon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leonhardt J (1968) Der Prallhammer, ein Meßinstrument zur Untersuchung des Gebirgsverhaltens, Dissertation TU ClausthalGoogle Scholar
  7. Roxborough F, Whittaker BN (1964) Roof Control and Coal Hardness. Coli EngGoogle Scholar
  8. Santowski G (1984) Korngrößenverteilung und Mineralbestand von Bausandsteinen des Bamberger Raumes. Diss Univ Mainz (im Druck)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Krauter
    • 1
  • H. Woszidlo
    • 2
  • H. Büdinger
    • 3
  1. 1.Geologisches Landesamt Rheinland-PfalzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Wasser- und Schiffahrtsdirektion SüdwestMainzGermany
  3. 3.Institut für GeowissenschaftenUniversität MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations