Advertisement

Bruchmechanismus steifer geklüfteter Tone bei einaxialer Kompression

  • V. Feeser
Conference paper

Summary

Recent results in fracture analysis have suggested that the Coulomb-Mohr criterion appears to be best suited for soils, while failure criteria based on microcrack nucleation may be best suited for rocks that have a great number of inherent ‘Griffith-cracks’ in the form of joints or grain boundaries, required by these theories.

In this context stiff fissured clays take up an intermediate position. They are substantial soils, but due to their sharp physical discontinuities they exhibit structural attributes of a rock mass.

A lot of efforts have been devoted to investigate the strength behavior of stiff fissured clays based on the Coulomb-Mohr criterion, yet the understanding of long-term as well as short-term strength and failure mechanism still remains insufficient.

The main objective of the investigations presented was to determine, whether dilatancy mechanics similar to those that are described in the rock mechanics literature may control the strength behaviour of stiff fissured clays in the lower isotropic stress region.

In order to obtain the stress-dilatancy relationship of a soil specimen under uniaxial compression, a new method was developed based on optographic trace recording of location points attached to the sample surface (fig. 6).

The results of dilatancy measurements offer a progressive Volumetrie strain rate with temporal intensity in various sample regions (fig. 9).

Comparing test readings with microfabric studies in scanning electron micrographs and thin section analysis (fig. 11, 12 and 13), dilatancy obviously results from microcrack nucleation.

New cracks were found to appear first at large components, such as quartz grains, close to inherent fissures and bending or forking of fissures (fig. 14).

At peak stress no faulting was obtained. Collapse of specimen occurs in post-failure region either as longitudinal Splitting or inclined shear-like fracturing (fig. 10).

Analytical energy calculations revealed that failure mechanisms obtainedcan be divided into six sequential events
  1. i)

    initiation of microcracks

     
  2. ii)

    stable propagation of microcracks

     
  3. iii)

    critical energy release

     
  4. iv)

    unstable microcrack propagation including coalescence of separate cracks leading to

     
  5. v)

    ultimate strength

     
  6. vi)

    formation of macroscopic fracture.

     

Thus failure mechanism of stiff fissured clays under uniaxial compression stands in contrast to soil mechanical understanding of shear failure.

Taking into account that failure mechanism below the brittle-ductile transition operates in the same manner, new findings for solving longterm strength behaviour may be expected.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brace WF (1960) An extension of Griffith theory of fracture to rocks. J Geophys Res 65: 3477–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Feeser V (1983) Erscheinungsform und Genese des Kluftgefüges glazidynamisch überprägter Tone (Patterns and origin of joints in glacidynamically affected pleistocene clays). Z dt geol Ges 134: 269–288Google Scholar
  3. Feeser V (1984) Optographic trace recording: a new method of strain measurement in geotechnical testing. Géotechnique 23Google Scholar
  4. Graham J, Houlsby GT (1983) Anisotropie elasticity of natural clay. Geotechnique 33: 165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans Roy Soc A 221: 163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffith AA (1924) Theory of rupture. Proc First Int Con Appl Mech, Delft: 55–63Google Scholar
  7. Hallbauer DK, Wagner H, Cook NGW (1973) Some observations concerning the microscopic and mechanical behaviour of quarzite speeimens in stiff triaxial compression tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sei & Geomech Abstr 10: 713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Irwin GR (1958) Fracture. In: Handbuch der Physik, Bd. IV, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 551–589Google Scholar
  9. Mogi K (1962) Study of the elastic shocks caused by the fracture of heterogeous materials and its relations to earthquake phenomena. Bull Earthqu Res Inst Tokyo Univ 40: 125–173Google Scholar
  10. Murell SAF (1958) The strength of coal under triaxial compresion. In: Mechanical properties of non-metallic brittle materials. Butterworths, London, pp 123–146Google Scholar
  11. Scholz C (1967) Frequency-magnitude relation of micro-fracturing events during the triaxial compression of rock. Trans Am Geophys Un 1: 025–219Google Scholar
  12. Trapponier P, Brace WF (1976) Development of stress-induced microcracks in Westerly Granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sei & Geomech Abstr 13: 103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wong TF (1982) Micromechanics of faulting in Westerly Granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sei & Geomech Abstr 19: 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wood DM (1980) Yielding in soft clay at Bäckebol, Sweden. Geotechnique 30: 49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Feeser
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Geologie und PaläontologieTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations