Advertisement

Urodynamics pp 60-68 | Cite as

Search for Anisotropy in Specific Electrical Conductance of Ureteral Tissue as a Measure of Muscle-Fiber Structure

  • W. A. van Duyl
Conference paper

Abstract

Electrical conductance is measured in pieces of ureteral tissue in two mutually perpendicular directions by means of a four-electrode technique. No anisotropy in conductance is found. It is concluded that there is no predominant fiber orientation. Passive tissue is a capacitance which, combined with the conductance, yields a value of a time constant which is too short to be a limiting factor in the propagation of peristaltic wave.

Keywords

Electrode Array Electrode Configuration Interelectrode Distance Peristaltic Wave Specific Electrical Conductance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dullman J (1967) Konstruktionsanalytische Untersuchung der Ureter und der Glandula vesiculosa. Acta Anat 68:344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duyl WA van, Coolsaet BLRA (1982) Potassium-induced contractions in pig ureter strips: consequences for helical muscle-fiber model of ureter. Urology XX: 53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Geddes LA, Baker LE (1967) The specific resistance of biological material. A compendium of data for muscle fibers. Med Biol Eng 5:271–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gielen FLH, Boon KL (1981) Measurement of the (complex) electrical conductivity and the anisotropy in skeletal muscle: a new electrode configuration. Proc 5th I.C.E.B.I., Tokyo pp 191–194Google Scholar
  5. Gosling JA, Dixon JS (1981) A three-dimensional analysis of the musculature of the upper urinary tract; abstract. Third Meeting of the Int. Soc. for Dyn. of the Upper Urinary Tract, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  6. Nagai T, Prosser CL (1963) Electrical parameters of smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol 204(5):915–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rush S (1962) Methods of measuring the resistivity of anisotropic conducting media in situ. J Res Nat Bur St Eng Instr 66C(3):217–222Google Scholar
  8. Satani Y (1919) Histological study of the ureter. J Urol 3:247Google Scholar
  9. Schnabel P (1967) Vierpunktmethode zur Messung der elektrischen Widerstandsanisotropie. Z Angew Phys 22:136–140Google Scholar
  10. Weast RC (1978) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics, 55 th edn. The Chemical Rubber Company, Ohio, USA, D253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. A. van Duyl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Medical PhysicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations