Coronary Angioplasty in Impending and Evolving Myocardial Infarction

  • P. W. Serruys
  • P. J. de Feyter
  • M. van den Brand
Conference paper
Part of the Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin / Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine book series (A+I, volume 178)


The clinical syndrome of unstable angina causes great concern to clinicians because of the perceived high risk of progression to myocardial infarction or death. The various options among pharmacological treatment and surgery have led to one consensus. It is now common practice to initially stabilize the acute ischemic symptoms with intensive medical treatment first and to reserve bypass surgery for those refractory to medical treatment. Since PTCA has gained acceptance as an alternative form of revascularization, patients with unstable angina pectoris, although initially not thought suitable as candidates, because of their instability, have successfully undergone this procedure [1, 2]. Now that investigator experience has grown and as significant advances have been made in catheter technology, it was considered timely to present our experience with emergency PTCA, with a steerable dilatation catheter, as an alternative to CABG.


Unstable Angina Coronary Angioplasty Coronary Artery Surgery Study Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Thrombolysis Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Williams DO, Riley RS, Singh AK, Gewirtz H, Most AS (1981) Evaluation of the role of coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am Heart J 102: 1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meyer J, Schmitz H, Kiesslich T, Erbel R, Krebs W, Schultz W, Bardos P, Minale C, Messmer BJ, Effert S (1983) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: analysis of early and late results. Am Heart J 106: 973–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faxon DP, Detre KM, McGabe CH, Fisher L, Holmes DR, Cowley J, Bourassa MG, van Raden TJ (1983) Role of percutaneous coronary angioplasty in the treatment of unstable angina. Report from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registries. Am J Cardiol 53/II: 131C–135CGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meltzer RS, van den Brand M, Serruys PW, Fioretti P, Hugenholtz PG (1982) Intracoronary sequential streptokinase and transluminal angioplasty in unstable angina with evolving infarction. Am Heart J 104: 1109–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Serruys PW, van den Brand M, Hooghoudt TEH, et al (1982) Coronary recanalization in acute myo-cardial infarction. Immediate results and potential risks. Eur H J 3: 404–415Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg S, Urban P, Greenspon A, Berger B, Walinsky M, Maroko P (1982) Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 49: 1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartzler G, Rutherford B, McConohay D (1982) Percutaneous coronary angioplasty with and without prior streptokinase infusion for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 49: 1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gold HK, Leinbach R, Palacios I, Block P, Buckley M, Akins C, Daggett W, Austen G (1982) Effect of immediate angioplasty on coronary patency following infarct therapy with streptokinase. Am J Cardiol 49: 1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. W. Serruys
  • P. J. de Feyter
  • M. van den Brand

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations