Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantikkonzepte in der Künstlichen Intelligenz

  • Conference paper
Book cover Künstliche Intelligenz

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 93))

  • 90 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Aufsatz werden die wichtigsten in der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI) formulierten und benützten Konzepte zur Darstellung der Semantik natürlicher Sprache vorgestellt und diskutiert. Man ist sich heute für alle Typen von natürlichsprachlichen Systemen (NSS) einig, dass eine semantische Komponente ein unverzichtbarer Bestandteil eines solchen Systems ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturangaben

  • Blau, D.: Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow D., Collins A.M. (eds) (1975): Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive science. Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow D., Winograd T. (1977): An overview of KRL, a knowledge representation language. In: Cognitive Science 1, pp. 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boley H. (1977): Directed recursive labelnode hypergraphs: A new representation language. In: Artificial Intelligence 9, pp. 49–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman R.J. (1979): On the Epistemological Status of Semantic Networks. In: Findler N.V. (ed.): Associative Networks-Representation and Use of knowledge by Computers. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun S., Schwind C.B. (1976): Automatic Semantics based Indexing of Natural Language Texts for Information Retrieval Systems. In: Information Processing and Management 12, pp. 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown F.M., Schwind C.B.: Towards an Integrated Theory of Natural Language Understanding. In: AISB/GI - Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hamburg (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown F.M., Schwind C.B,: Outline of an Integrated Theory of Natural Language Understanding. In: Bolc L. (ed.) Representation and processing of natural Language. Hanser/Macmillan, München/London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce B.C. (1971): A Model for Temporal References and its Application in a Question Answering Program. In: Artificial Intelligence 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmerauer A. (1978): Metamorphosis Grammars. In: Bolc L.(ed.): Natural Language Communication with Computers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 63. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New york.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmerauer A., Pique J.F. (1981): About Natural Logic. In: Gallaire H., Minker J., Nicolas J.M. (eds.): Advances in Data Base Theory Vol. 1. Plenum Press New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper W.S. (1964): Fact Retrieval and Deductive Question-Answering Information Retrieval Systems. In: JACM 11, n° 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl V. (1979): Quantification in a three valued logic for natural language question-answering systems. In: IJCAI-6, Tokyo.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl V, (1979): Logical design of deductive natural language consultable data bases, Proc. 5 th Internat. Conference on very large data bases, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl V. (1981): Translating Spanish into Logic through Logic. In: AJCL 13 pp. 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl V., McCord M, (1983): Treating Coordination in Logic Grammars In: AJCL, Vol 9, n°2. pp. 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore C. (1968): The case for case. In: Bach E., Harms R. (eds.): Universals in linguistic theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findler N, (ed.) (1979): Associative Networks, Representation and Use of knowledge by Computers. Academic Press, New York, San Francisco London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frege G. (1982): Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Zeitschrift für Philosophische Kritik, pp. 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • v. Hahn W., Hoeppner W,., Jameson A,, Wahlster W. (1980): The anatomy of the natural language dialogue system HAM-RPM, In: Bole L, (ed.): Natural language based computer systems. Hanser/Macmillan, München, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes P.J. (1971): A logic of actions. In: Meitzer B., Michie D. (eds,) Machine Intelligence. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janas J.M,, Schwind C.B. (1979): Extensional Semantic Networks: Their Representation, Application and Generation. In: (Findler N. (ed.) 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A., Webber B,, Sag I. (1981): Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlah W., Lorenzen P, (1967): Logische Propädeutik oder Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens. BI Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S.J. (1981): Appropriate responses to inappropriate questions. In: (Joshi et al. 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S.J. (1982): Cooperative responses from a portable natural language query system. In: Artificial Intelligence 19, pp. 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J. (1969) : Philosophie der Sprache, Theorie Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt a Main (Ubersetzt aus dem Amerikanischen, Originalausgabe (1966)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellog C. (1968): A natural language compiler for on-line data management. Proc. Fall Joint Computer Conf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth D.E. (1969) : Semantics of context-free languages. In : Math. Syst. Theory 2„

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski R.A. (1979): Logic for Problem Solving, North Holland New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S.A. (1959) A Completness Theorem in Modal Logic. In: The Journal of Symbolic Logic 24, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S.A. (1963) : Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I, normal propositional calculi. In : Zeitschr. f. math. Logik u. Gründl. d. Math. 9, pp. 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S.A. ( 1963 b): Semantical considerations on Modal Logic. In: Acta Philosophica Fennica, pp. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • v. Leibnitz G.W. (1840): Opera Philosophica, Erdmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna Z., Pnueli A. (1983) : Verification of Concurrent Programs : A Temporal Proof System. Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Report No. STAN-CS-83-967

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Carthy J., Hayes P,Y. (1969) : Some Philosophical problems from the standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. In : Meitzer B., Michie D. (eds.) : Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Carthy J. (1981): A problem in Formalisation, Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Cord M.C. (1981): Focalizers, the Scoping Problem, and Semantic Interpretation Rules in Logic Grammars. In: Warren D., Van Caneghem M. (eds.): Logic Programming and its Application. To appear

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Cord M.C. (1982) : Using Slots and Modifiers in Logic Grammars for Natural Language. In : Artificial Intelligence 18, pp. 327–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Dermott D, (1982) : Nonmonotonic logic II : Nonmonotonic Modal Theories. In : JACM 29,1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M. (1975): A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston P, (ed.): The psychology of Computer vision Mc Graw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M, (ed.) (1968) : Semantic Information Processing MIT Press Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira F. Warren D. (1980) : Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis-a survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Transition Networks. In : Artificial Intelligence 13, pp. 231–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira F., Warren D. (1982) : An Efficient Easily Adaptable System for Interpreting Natural Language Queries. In : AJCL 8, pp. 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior A.N. (1967): Past, Present, Future. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian M.R. (1968): Semantic memory. In: ( Minsky M. 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian M.R. (1969): The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and thery of language. In: CACM 12, n° 8, pp. 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael B. (1968): SIR: A Computer program for semantic information retrieval. In: ( Minsky M. 1968 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter R. (1980) : A logic for Default Reasoning. In : Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13 pp. 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N., Urquhart A, (1971): Temporal Logic. Berlin, Heidelberg New York, Wien: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts R.B., Goldstein I.P. (1977): The FRL manual MIT, AI Laboratory, Memo Nr. 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C.(1973) : Inference and Conceptual Memory. In : Coling 73 Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C.(ed.) (1975): Conceptual Information Processing. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C., Abelson R,P, (1977): Goals, plans, scripts and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C., Goldman N., Rieger C,, Riesbeck C. (1973) : MARGIE : Memory, analysis, response generation and inference in English.Proceeding of IJCAI-3, pp. 225–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C., Goldman N. Rieger C., Riesbeck C, (1975): Inference and paraphrase by computer. JACM, vol. 22, N° 3, pp. 309–328.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C,, Riesbeck C.K, (1981): Inside computer understanding. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank R.C. (1982): Dynamic Memory.Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert L, (1976); Extending the expressive power of semantic networks. In: Artificial Intelligence 7, pp. 163–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert L.K., Goebel R.G., Cercone N,J. (1979): The structure and Organization of a Semantic net for comprehension and inference. In: ( Findler N. 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarcz R.M., Burger J.F., Simmons R.F. (1970) : A deductive question Answerer for Natural language Inference. In : CACM Vol. 13, N° 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind C.B. (1975) : Generating hierarchical semantic networks from natural language discourse. In : IJCAI 4 Tbilisi, pp. 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind C.B. (1977): Ein Formalismus zur Beschreibung der Syntax und Bedeutung von Frage-Antwort-Systemen. Ph. D. Thesis. TUM-INFO-7710. Institut für Informatik der TUM, 1977, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, C.B. (1978): Representing Actions by State Logic. In Proceedings of the AISB/GI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Hambourg, 1978, pp. 304–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, C.B. (1979): Entwicklung einer integrierten Theorie zur Sprachanalyse. In: Christaller T., Metzing D. (eds.): Augmented Transition Network Grammatiken. Einhorn-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, C.B. (1982) : Natural language Access to PROLOG Database Systems. In : Wahlster W. (ed.) : GWAI-82, 6 th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, C.B. (1983) : A completeness Proof for a Logic of Actions. Report LISH 172 bis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, C.B. (1984): Logic Based Natural Language Processing. International workshop on Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming. Rennes 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S.C. (1979) : The SNe PS Semantic Network Processing System. In : (Findler N.1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons R.F. (1973): Semantic Networks: Their computation and use for understanding English sentences. In: Schank R.C., Colby K.M. (eds.): Computer Models of Thought and Language. Freeman, San Francisco, California, pp. 63–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons R.F., Bruce B.C. (1971): Some relations between predicate calculus and semantic net representations of discourse, IJCAI 2, pp. 524–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons R.F., Chester D. (1977): Inferences in quantified semantic Networks. IJCAI 5, pp. 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons R.F., Slocum J. (1972) : Generating English discourse from semantic networks. In : CACM 15, n° 10, pp. 891–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridharan N.S. (1978) : AIMDS user manual version 2, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Dept. of Computer Science, Report Nr. CBM-TR-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlster W. (1982): Natürlichsprachliche Systeme, eine Einführung in die sprachorientiente KI - Forschung. In: Bibel W., Siekmann J.H. (eds): Künstliche Intelligenz, Frühjährsschule Teisendorf, März 1982. Informatik-Fachberichte 59, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 203–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber B.L. (1978) : A Formal Approach to Discourse Anaphora. Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Report n° 3761. Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber B.L. ( 1981): Discourse model synthesis. In: (Joshi A. et al. 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky R. (1978): Understanding goal-based stories. Ph. D. Dissertation, Yale University, Computer Science Department, Report Nr. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T. (1972): Understanding natural language. Academic Press New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T. (1975): Frame Representations and the Declarative/Procedural Controversy. In: ( Bobrow D., Collins A.M. 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W. (1975): What’s in a link ? Foundations for semantic networks. In: ( Bobrow D. Collins A.M. 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W. ( 1981): Procedural semantics as a theory of meaning. In: (Joshi A. et al. 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiwen Ma, Weide G. (1983) : W-JS : A Modal Logic of knowledge. In : IJCAI-83 pp. 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Groupe Représentation et Traitement des Connaissances, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 31, chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402, Marseille Cedex 9, France

    Camilla B. Schwind

Authors
  1. Camilla B. Schwind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Angewandte Informatik, TU Berlin, Sekr. FR 5-8 Franklinstr. 28-29, 1000, Berlin 10, Germany

    Christopher Habel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schwind, C.B. (1985). Semantikkonzepte in der Künstlichen Intelligenz. In: Habel, C. (eds) Künstliche Intelligenz. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 93. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70283-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70283-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-15190-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70283-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation