On the Representation of the Geoid on the Ellipsoid

  • Antonio Marussi

Abstract

Recently the discussion has been reopened on the problem of the representation of a geodetic network on the ellipsoid (Vening-Meinesz et al. 1950), a question whose importance is not only theoretical, but also practical, since very extensive geodetic networks of continental scale have been unified into great complexes, and still more will be in the near future. With the growth in the dimensions of those complexes, the divergence between the actual surface of the geoid and that of the ellipsoid becomes increasingly in evidence, and account must be taken of those discrepancies which could for the most part be ignored in practice when working in more limited regions.

Keywords

Azimuth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Ivory J (1828) On the method in the trigonometrical survey for finding the difference of longitude of two stations very little different in latitude. Philos Mag, Ann Philos, December 1828:432Google Scholar
  2. Marussi A (1951) Su alcune proprietà fondamentali delle rappresentazioni conformi fra superfici qualunque. Boll Geodes Sci Affini no 2Google Scholar
  3. Tiarks Dr. (1828) On Mr Dalby’s method of finding the difference of longitude between two points of a geodetical line on a spheroid, from the latitude of those points and the azimuths of the geodetical line at the same. Philos Mag, Ann Philos, November 1828:364Google Scholar
  4. Vening-Meinesz FA, Baeschlin F, Hotine M (1950) New formulas for systems of deflections of the plumb-line and Laplace’s theorem. Bull Géodés no 11Google Scholar
  5. Vening-Meinesz FA, Baeschlin F, Hotine M (1951) Deviations of the vertical. Discussion. Emp Surv Rev April 1951:69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Marussi
    • 1
  1. 1.TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations