The optimal choice of chronic dialysis therapy for uremic children continues to be a subject of great interest and concern. Although technical aspects of dialysis in children have improved significantly over the past ten years, continued efforts to minimize complications and increase therapeutic benefits for the pediatric patient remain a considerable challenge. The major aim of dialysis in children should be the use of well-tolerated, simple procedures that produce an improved state of well-being in the patient and, most importantly, allow for normal growth and development. The techniques of continuous, long-dwell peritoneal dialysis (continuous ambulatory [CAPD] or continuous cycling [CCPD] peritoneal dialysis) have of late received a great deal of attention and application [1–8], and the reported therapeutic benefits of CAPD and CCPD have led to an evaluation of these two techniques in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Recent reports have revealed variable results in children treated with CAPD [9–15] and indicate that evaluation of greater numbers of children is needed to determine the actual benefits to be gained for children undergoing the different forms of prolonged-dwell peritoneal dialysis. The present report summarizes the collaborative studies of the pediatric nephrologists who comprise the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group and addresses specific questions regarding the relative efficacy of CAPD and CCPD in a large series of children.
KeywordsPeritoneal Dialysis Standard Deviation Score Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Serum Phosphorus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patient
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Randerson DH, Farrell PC (1981) Clinical assessment of CAPD. Dial Transplant 10:389Google Scholar
- 8.Diaz-Buxo JA, Walker PJ, Chandler JT, Farmer CD, Holt KL (1981) Advances in peritoneal dialysis: continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis. Contemp Dial Nov 23Google Scholar
- 10.Balfe JW, Vigneaux A, Willumsen J, Hardy BE (1981) The use of CAPD in the treatment of children with end-stage renal disease. Perit Dial Bull 1:35–37Google Scholar
- 16.Hamill PW, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF (1977) NCHS growth curves for children, birth-18 years, United States. National Center for Health Statistics 43–45, Hyatts-ville (Vital and health statistics, Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey, no 165). [DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 78-1650]Google Scholar
- 17.Wineman RJ (1983) Rationale of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int 23 (Suppl 13):8–10Google Scholar