Advertisement

Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei neurologischen Erkrankungen

  • K. Lowitzsch
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Durch Entwicklung sog. Kompaktgeräte für die Registrierung evozierter Potentiale ist heute der Laboraufbau relativ einfach geworden, da eine Anpassung verschiedener Einzelgeräte untereinander nicht mehr erforderlich ist. Auch die Größe der Geräte konnte durch Einführung der Mikroprozessorentechnik wesentlich verringert werden. Da die Registriereinheit sowie die Verarbeitungs- und Dokumentationsebene für alle Arten evozierter Potentiale gleich sind, soll im folgenden nur auf die verschiedenen Reizgeräte eingegangen werden (Abb. 6.1).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Arden GB (1973) The visual evoked response in ophthalmology. Proc R Soc Med 66: 1037–1043PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arden GB, Faulkner DJ, Mair C (1977) A versatile television pattern generator for visual evoked potentials. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Visual evoked potentials in man: New development. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 90–109Google Scholar
  3. Armington JC, Corwin TR, Marsetta R (1971) Simultaneously recorded retinal and cortical responses to pattern Stimuli. J Opt Soc Amer 61: 1514–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asselmann P, Chadwick DW, Marsden CD (1975) Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 98: 261–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babel J, Stangos N, Korol S, Spiritus M (1977) Ocular electrophysiology. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer JH (1974) Communication to: Judgement of the validity of a clinical MS-diagnosis. The International Symposium on Multiple Sclerosis, Göteborg 1974. Acta Neurol Scand [Suppl] 58: 71–74Google Scholar
  7. Baumgartner G (1978) Physiologie des zentralen Nervensystems. In: Gauer, Kramer, Jung (Hrsg) Sehen, Sinnesphysiologie III. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, S 263–356Google Scholar
  8. Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM (1982) The pattern visual evoked potential in the clinical assessment of undiagnosed spinal cord disease. In: Courjon J, Maugière F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 463–471Google Scholar
  9. Bodis-Wollner I, Korczyn AD (1980) Dissociated sensory loss and visual evoked potentials in a patient with pernicious anemia. Mt Sinai J Med 47: 579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bynke H, Olsson J, Rosen I (1977) Diagnostic value of visual evoked response, clinical eye examination and CSF analysis in chronic myelopathy. Acta Neurol Scand 26: 55–69Google Scholar
  11. Camacho LM, Wenzel W, Aschoff JC (1982) The pattern-reversal visual evoked potential in the clinical study of lesions of the optic chiasm and visual pathway. In: Courjon J, Maugiere F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 49–59Google Scholar
  12. Cappin J, Nissim S (1975) Visual evoked responses in the detection of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol NY 93: 9–18Google Scholar
  13. Carroll WM, Mastaglia SL (1979) Leber’s optic neuropathy. A clinical and visual evoked potential study of affected asymptomatic members of a six generation family. Brain 102: 559–580Google Scholar
  14. Carroll WM, Kriss A, Baraitser M, Barret G, Halliday AM (1980) The incidence and nature of visual pathway involvement in Friedreich’s ataxia. A clinical and visual evoked potential study of 22 patients. Brain 103: 413–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Celesia GG, Daly RF (1977) Effects of aging on visual evoked responses. Arch Neurol 34: 403–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiappa KH (1980) Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 30: 110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciganek L (1961) Die elektroencephalographische Lichtreizantwort der menschlichen Hirnrinde. Thesis Slovenskej Akademie Vied, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins DWK, Black JL, Mastaglia FL (1978) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potential: Method of analysis and results in MS. Neurol Sci 36: 83–95Google Scholar
  19. Diener H-Ch, Scheibler H (1980) Follow-up studies of visual potentials in multiple sclerosis evoked by checkerboard and foveal Stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 49: 490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donchin E, Callaway E, Copper R, Desmedt JE, Goff WR, Hillyard SA, Sutton S (1977) Publication criteria for studies of evoked potentials (EP) in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Attention voluntary contraction and event-related cerebral potentials. Prog Clin Neurophysiol 1:1–11Google Scholar
  21. Evans BT, Binnie CD, Lloyd DSL (1974) A simple visual pattern stimulator. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 37: 403–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feinsod M, Abramsky O, Auerbach E (1973) Electrophysiological examinations of the visual system in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 20: 161–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feinsod M, Hoyt WF, Wilson WB, Spire JP (1975) Electrophysiological parameters in the evaluation of occipital apoplexy. Eur Neurol 13: 452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gott PS, Weiss MH, Apuzzo M, Van Der Meulen JP (1979) Checkerboard visual evoked response in evaluation and management of pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery 5: 553–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halliday AM (1972a) Discussion on component analysis and topology. Trace 6: 39–46Google Scholar
  26. Halliday AM (1972b) Evoked responses in organic and functional sensory loss. In: Fessard A, Lelord G (eds) Activités evoquées et leur conditionement chez l’Homme normal et en pathologic mentale. INSERM, Paris, pp 189–212Google Scholar
  27. Halliday AM (1980) Evoked brain potentials: how far have we come since 1875? In: Barber C (ed) Evoked potentials. MTP Press, Lancaster (England), pp 3–18Google Scholar
  28. Halliday AM (1981) Visual evoked potentials in demyelinating disease. In: Waxman SG, Ritchies JM (eds) Basic and clinical electrophysiology. Raven Press, New York, pp 201–215Google Scholar
  29. Halliday AM (1982) Committee on Standards of clinical practice of EEG and EMG (IFSECN). Report to the president. Appendix I F: Standards of clinical practice for the recording of evoked potentials (EP). ( In press )Google Scholar
  30. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1972) Delayed visual evoked responses in optic neuritis. Lancet 1: 982–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1974) Delayed visual evoked responses in progressive spastic paraparesis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 37: 328Google Scholar
  32. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1974) The value of the pattern-evoked response in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 36: 551–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1976) The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 99: 357–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halliday AM, Barrett G, Carroll WM, Kriss A (1982) Problems in defining the normal limits of the visual evoked potential. In: Courjon J, Maugiere F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  35. Harding GFA (1974) The visual evoked response. Adv Ophthal 28: 2–28Google Scholar
  36. Harding GFA, Crews SJ (1982) The visual evoked potential in hereditary optic atrophy. In: Courjon J, Maugière F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 21–30Google Scholar
  37. Harter MR, White CT (1968) Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visual evoked potentials. Vision Res 8: 701–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harter MR, White CT (1970) Evoked cortical responses to checker-board patterns: Effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 28: 48–54Google Scholar
  39. Hennerici M, Wenzel D, Freund H-J (1977) The comparison of small-size rectangle and checker-board Stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 100: 119–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holder GE (1978) The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 45: 278–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (III )Google Scholar
  42. Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B (1980) Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc nat Acad Sci (Wash) 77: 2348–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kayed K, Røsjø Ø, Kass B (1978) Practical application of patterned visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 57: 317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kooi KA, Bagchi BK (1964a) Visual response in man: normative data. Ann NY Acad Sci 112: 254–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kooi KA, Bagchi BK (1964b) Observations in early components of the visual evoked response and occipital rhythms. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 17: 638–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kooi KA, Marshall RE (1979) Visual evoked potentials in central disorders of the visual system. Harper & Row Publ, HagerstownGoogle Scholar
  47. Kriss A, Halliday AM (1980) A comparison of occipital potentials evoked by pattern onset, offset and reversal by movement. In: Barber C (ed) Evoked potentials. MTP Press Lim, Lancaster (England), pp 205–212Google Scholar
  48. Krumholz A, Weiss HD, Goldstein PJ, Harris KC (1981) Evoked responses in vitamin Bt2 deficiency. Ann Neurol 9: 407–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kusel R, Rassow B (1980) Frequency analysis of steady-state VECP. Ver Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 77: 1–4Google Scholar
  50. Livingstone IR, Mastaglia FL, Howe JW, Asherne GB (1980) Leber’s optic neuropathy: clinical and visual evoked response studies in asymptomatic and symptomatic members of a 4-generation family. Brit J Ophthalmol 64: 751–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Livingstone IR, Mastaglia FL, Edis R, Howe JW (1981a) Pattern visual evoked responses in hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44: 176–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Livingstone IR, Mastaglia FL, Edis R, Howe J (1981b) Visual involvement in Friedreich’s ataxia and hereditary spastic ataxia. A clinical and visual evoked response study. Arch Neurol 38: 75–79Google Scholar
  53. Lowitzsch K (1976) Studien zur diagnostischen Absicherung der Multiplen Sklerose. Erfassung und Lokalisation von Demyelinisationsherden aufgrund des Vergleiches klinischer, ophthalmologischer und neurophysiologischer Untersuchungsbefunde bei 135 Patienten. Habilitationsschrift MainzGoogle Scholar
  54. Lowitzsch K (1980) Pattern evoked visual potentials in 251 MS patients in relation to ophthalmological findings and diagnostic Classification. In: Bauer HJ, Poser S, Ritter G (eds) Progress in multiple sclerosis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 571–577Google Scholar
  55. Lowitzsch K (1981) Visuell evozierte Potentiale (VEP) in der Diagnostik entzündlicher Erkrankungen des ZNS. In: Berlit P, Gänshirt H (Hrsg) 11. Intern Symposium z Koord d Neurol Wiss 1981, Heidelberg. (1984) Perimed Verl, S 269–275Google Scholar
  56. Lowitzsch K (1982) Augenmuskelmyositis und Optikus. Ges für Neurologie, Jahrestagung 14.–16.10.1982, Hamburg. S 604–607Google Scholar
  57. Lowitzsch K (1982) Visuell evozierte Potentiale (VEP) bei der Multiplen Sklerose. Akt Neurol 9: 170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lowitzsch K, Kuhnt U, Sakmann CH, Maurer K, Hopf H-C, Schott D, Thäter K (1976) Visual pattern evoked responses and blink reflexes in assessment of MS diagnosis. A cünical study of 135 MS-patients. J Neurol 213: 17–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lowitzsch K, Bauer H (1980) Half-field evoked responses (VER): phase inversion in relation to recording techniques. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 50: 136–137Google Scholar
  60. Lowitzsch K, Westhoff M (1980) Opticusaffektionen bei Neurolues — Diagnose durch das visuell evozierte Potential ( VEP ). Z EEG-EMG 11: 77–80Google Scholar
  61. Lowitzsch K, Göhring U, Hecking E, Köhler H (1981) Refractory period, sensory conduction velocity and visual evoked potentials before and after haemodialysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 44: 121–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lowitzsch K, Rudolph HD, Trincker E, Müller E (1980) Flash and pattern reversal evoked visual responses in retrobulbarneuritis and controls: a comparison of conventional and TV Stimulation techniques. In: Lechner H, Aranibar A (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd European Congress of EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam Oxford Princeton, pp 451 - 463Google Scholar
  63. Lowitzsch K, Maurer K (1982) Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in reclassification of 472 MS-patients. In: Courjon J, Maugiere F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 487–491Google Scholar
  64. Lowitzsch K, Welkoborski H-J (1982) “Normaüzation” of pattern-reversal VEP after ON in MS-patients. The Second International Evoked Potentials Symposium, Cleveland, Ohio, 18.-20.10.1982Google Scholar
  65. Lowitzsch K, Neuhann Th (1982) Musterumkehr-VEP in der Diagnostik von Drusen- und Stauungs¬papille. Fortschr Ophthalmol 79: 1–3Google Scholar
  66. Lowitzsch K, Flickinger U, Kempkes K, Mandery G (1983) Musterumkehr-VEP bei TV- und Drehspiegelreizung: ein methodischer Vergleich. Z EEG-EMG 14: 43–66Google Scholar
  67. Lowitzsch K, Scherer A, Welkoborski H-J (1983) Unveröffentlichte Ergebnisse Marshall J (1955) Spastic paraplegia of middle age. A clinicopathological study. Lancet 1: 643–646Google Scholar
  68. Matthews WB, Small DG (1979) Serial recording of visual and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sei 40: 11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Matthews WB, Small DG, Pountnex E (1977) The pattern evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40: 1009–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meienberg O, Kutak L, Smolenski C, Ludin HP (1979) Pattern reversal evoked cortical responses in normals. A study of different methods of Stimulation and potential reproducibility. J Neurol 22: 81–93Google Scholar
  71. Müller-Jensen A, Zschocke S, Dannheim F (1981) VER analysis of the chiasmal Syndrome. J Neurol 225: 33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Namerow NS, Enns N (1972) Visual evoked responses in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 35: 269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nilsson BY (1978) Visual evoked responses in MS: Comparison of two methods for pattern reversal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41: 499–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Oepen G, Brauner C, Doerr M, Thoden U (1981) Visual evoked potentials ( VEP) elicited by checkerboard versus foveal Stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 229: 305–313Google Scholar
  75. Oosterhuis HJGH, Ponsen L, Jonkman EJ, Magnus O (1969) The average visual response in patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 27: 23–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Paty DW, Blume WT, Brown WF, Jaatoul N, Kertesz A, Mclnnis W (1979) Chronic progressive myelopathy: investigation with CSF electrophoresis, evoked potentials and CT scan. Ann Neurol 6: 419–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pedersen L, Trojaborg W (1981) Visual, auditory and somatosensory pathway involvement in hereditary cerebellar ataxia, Friedreich’s ataxia and familial spastic. Electroenceph Clin Neuro-physiol 52: 283–297Google Scholar
  78. Regan D (1972) Evoked potentials in psychology, sensory physiology and clinical medicine. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Richey ET, Kooi KA, Tourtelotte WW (1971) Visually evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34: 275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rossini PM, Marchiono L, Gambi D, Albertazzi A, Di Paolo B (1982) Transient and steady State visual evoked potentials by checkerboard reversal pattern in renal diseases. In: Courjon J, Maugière F, Revol M (eds) Clinical application of evoked potentials in neurology. Raven Press, New York, pp 125–130Google Scholar
  81. Shahrokhi F, Chiappa KH, Young RR (1978) Pattern shift visual evoked responses: two hundred patients with optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 35: 65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith JL, Israel CW (1971) Optic atrophy and neurosyphilis. Ann Rev Med 22: 103–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spekreijse H (1966) Analysis of EEG responses in man evoked by sine wave modulated light. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, p 163Google Scholar
  84. Spekreijse H (1980) Pattern evoked potentials: principles methodology and phenomenology. In: Carber C (ed) Evoked potentials, MTP Press, Lancaster, pp 55–74Google Scholar
  85. Spekreijse H, Estevez O, Reits D (1977) Visual evoked potentials and the physiological analysis of visual processes in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 16–89Google Scholar
  86. Streletz LJ, Chambers RA, Sung Ho Bae, Israel HL (1981a) Visual evoked potentials in sarcoidosis. Neurology 31: 1545–1549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Streletz LJ, Sung Ho Bae, Roeshman RM, Schatz NJ, Savino PJ (1981b) Visual evoked potentials in occipital lobe lesions. Arch Neurol 38: 80–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Tackmann W, Strenge H, Barth R, Sojka-Raytscheff A (1979) Diagnostic validity for different components of pattern shift visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Europ Neurol 18: 243–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thorwirth V, Volles E, Lossi Ch (1980) Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei zerebralem Gefäßprozeß. Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochirur Psychiatrie 127:89–97Google Scholar
  90. Trojaborg W, Petersen E (1979) Visual and somatosensory evoked cortical potentials in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42:323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Troncoso J, Mancall EL, Schatz NJ (1979) Visual evoked responses in pernicious anemia. Arch Neurol 36: 168–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Van Lith GHM, Van Marl GW, Van Dok-Mak GTM (1978) Variation in latency times of visually evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophth 62: 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walsh FB (1964) Syphilis of the optic nerve. Trans Am Acad Ophthal Oto-Lar 60: 39–42Google Scholar
  94. Wenzel D, Brandl U, Harms D (1982) Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei komplizierter Migräne im Kindesalter. Z EEG-EMG 12: 222Google Scholar
  95. Wijngaarde R, Van Lith GHM (1979) Pattern eps in endocrine orbitopathy. Doc Ophthal 48: 327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wilson B (1978) Visual-evoked response differentiation of ischemic optic neuritis from the optic neuritis of MS. Am J Ophthalmol 86: 530–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilson WSB, Keyesr RB (1980) Comparison of the pattern and diffuse light visuel evoked responses in definite multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 37: 30–34PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Lowitzsch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations