Skip to main content

What Amnesics Can and Can Not Do

  • Conference paper
Neurology
  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

Human memory is not of course a unitary function, and there has over the last 10 or 20 years been considerable controversy as to how many kinds of memory should be assumed. While this is still an area of lively disagreement, at least some of this is probably more terminological than conceptual. There would probably be relatively broad agreement about a preliminary analysis of memory into at least three separate domains, namely sensory memory, working memory and long-term memory. The term sensory memory refers to the brief storage of information presented to the senses which forms part of the process of perception. It seems likely that brain damage will on occasion produce deficits in these systems, but they are likely to present as perceptual rather than memory problems, and as such are beyond the scope of the present review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley AD (1982) Amnesia: a minimal model and an interpretation. In: Cermak LS (ed) Human memory and amnesia. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 305–336

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baddeley AD, Wilson BA (to be published) Amnesia, autobiographical memory and confabulation. In: Rubin D (ed) Autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Squire LR (1981) Two forms of amnesia: an analysis of forgetting. J Neurosci 1: 630–635

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sunderland A, Harris JE, Baddeley AD (1983) Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. JVLVB 22: 341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E, Donaldson W (eds), Organisation of memory. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warrington EK, Weiskrantz L (1968) A new method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature 217: 972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD (1985) The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Thames Valley Test Company, 22 Bulmershe Road, Reading, England

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baddeley, A. (1986). What Amnesics Can and Can Not Do. In: Poeck, K., Freund, HJ., Gänshirt, H. (eds) Neurology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70007-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70007-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70009-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70007-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics