Advertisement

Medical Appropriateness: A Systems Approach

  • W. W. Diggs
Conference paper
Part of the Health Systems Research book series (HEALTH)

Abstract

The governing body of a health facility or operation is expected to hold the medical staff responsible for monitoring and evaluating the medical appropriateness of the services provided and to expect periodic performance reports. The purpose of this paper is to review the systems involved in the monitoring and evaluation of the quality and appropriateness of medical care as an institutional responsibility.

Keywords

Medical Staff Quality Assurance Program Institutional Responsibility Peer Review System Usage Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American College of Physicians (Undated) Clinical efficacy assessment project (CEAP). Facts, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Gay J, Jacobs B (1983) The technology explosion in medical science. SP Medical and Scientific Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerrish E (1983) Personal correspondence. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Griner P, Glaser R (1982) Misuse of laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. N Engl J Med 307: 21: 1336–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) (1984) Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. JCAH, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) (1984) Perspectives. JCAH 4: 1Google Scholar
  7. Maxwell J et al (1984) Effect of medical care evaluation program on physician knowledge and performance. J Med Educ 59: 33–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McPherson K et al (1982) Small area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med 121: 1310–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rabkin S, Home J (1979) Preoperative electrocardiography: its cost-effectiveness in detecting abnormalities when a previous tracing exists. Can Med Assoc J 121: 301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Roberts J, Walczak R (1984) Toward effective quality assurance. QRB 10: 1: 11–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag , Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. W. Diggs
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Community and Allied Health ProfessionsUniversity of Tennessee, Center for the Health SciencesMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations