Summary

Psychologically competition represents a stress-inducing stimulus. When this stimulus approaches, a status which can be described in physiological and psychological terms results: the pre-start-situation.

This situation causes changes in the biochemistry of the body, in skin resistance, in brain wave patterns and in many other physical processes. Among these processes pulse frequency is most easily measured and gives clear results. This was demonstrated by investigations carried out on students before a 400 m sprint, before trampolin exercises, before diving, before practical examinations in basketball, gymnastics and swimming, and before written examinations. It was found that quite often the pulse rates due to stress before an exam are higher than during the actual exam itself.

In clinical treatment of psychosomatic diseases breathing-biofeedback has proven to be a suitable method of controlling central nervous processes. But the question still remained whether this method could be helpful in sports competition situations. This was investigated with a group of students to see particularly whether breathing-biofeedback is useful for the control of the pre-start-situation, a condition of stress. It was found that this kind of a biofeedback training can indeed reduce the pulse frequency, a sign of stress, during the pre-start situation.

Breathing-Biofeedback as a Possibility for Regulating the Pre-Start-Situation

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bathe LN (1975) Erweiterte Untersuchungen mit dem rbf-System und Kontrolle der Ergebnisse von K. Fontheim. Med. Diss., GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer W, Allmer H, Knobloch J (1973) Subjektive Reaktionsänderungen in der Anti-zipations- und Relaxationsphase einer Wettkampfsituation. In: Feige K et al. (Red) Bericht über den III. Europäischen Kongreß für Sportpsychologie. Hofmann, Schorndorf, S 40–52Google Scholar
  3. Bösel R et al. (1978) Streß, Einführung in die psychosomatische Belastungsforschung. Höffman & Campe, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson RJ, Schwartz GA (1976) Patterns of cerebral lateralization during cardiac biofeedback versus the self-regulation of emotion: Sex differences. Psychophysiology 13/1:62–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eberspächer H (1979) Streß und Psychoregulation. In: Gabler H, Eberspächer H, Hahn E, Kern J, Schilling G (Hrsg) Praxis der Psychologie im Leistungssport. Bartels & Wernitz, Berlin München FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  6. Handt W (1976) Weitere Ergebnisse der Behandlung mit dem respiratorischen Feedback (rfb) unter Einschluß einer Syndromanalyse. Med. Diss., GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatch JP, Gatchel RJ (1979) Development of physiological response patterns concomitant with the learning of voluntary heart rate control. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93/3:306–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knobloch J (1977).Streß und Streßanfälligkeit. Dissertation FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Lazarus RS (1966) Psychological stress and the coping process. Mc Graw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Leuner H (1977a) Selbstkontrolle vegetativer Funktionen durch Biofeedback-Methoden (Rückkoppelungsverstärkung). Therapiewoche 27:5512–5524Google Scholar
  11. Leuner H (1977b) Das respiratorische Feedback. DJA-Moderne Therapie 9:18–37Google Scholar
  12. Magnussen E (1976) The effects of controlled muscle tension on performance and learning of heart-rate control. Biolog Psychol 4:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mc Kinney MA, Gatchel RJ, Brantley D, Harrington R (1980) The impact of biofeedback -manipulated physiological chance on emotional state. Basis Appl Social Psychol 1(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nitsch JR (1976) Theoretische Grundlagen sportpsychologischer Beanspruchungsanalysen. In: Nitsch J, Udris I (Hrsg) Beanspruchung im Sport. Limpert, Bad Homburg, S 15–59Google Scholar
  15. Selbach H (1949) Das Kippschwingungsprinzip in der Analyse der vegetativen Selbststeuerung. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 17:129–159Google Scholar
  16. Siedeck H (1955) Über die zeitlichen Verhältnisse der phasenförmigen Reizbeantwortung nach Pyrogeninjektion. Acta Neurovegetativa 11:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steinbach M (1971a) Medizinisch-psychologische Probleme der Wettkampfvorbereitung. Bartels & Wernitz, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Steinbach M (1971b) Der sportliche Wettkampf als Stressmodell. Therapiewoche 36: 2613–2617Google Scholar
  19. Steiner H (1976) Leistungsmotivation und Wettkampfanalyse. Czwalina, AhrensburgGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaitl D (1975a) Zur Problematik des Biofeedback, dargestellt am Beispiel der Herzfrequenzkontrolle. Psychologische Rundschau 26:191–211Google Scholar
  21. Vanek M, Hosek V (1977) Zur Persönlichkeit des Sportlers. Hofmann, Schorndorf Vester F (1978) Phänomen Stress. DTV, MünchenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schmole

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations