Advertisement

Work Status and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

  • F. Boulay
  • P. David
  • P. R. David
  • M. G. Bourassa
Conference paper

Abstract

Since the first successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was performed in man in September 1977 (Grüntzig 1978), the results of this nonoperative approach to the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease have been increasingly positive. Although coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) appears to improve the quality of life and to prolong survival in selected subsets of patients, it has apparently failed to affect employment and recreational status (National Institutes of Health Consensus — Development Conference Statement 1981; Oberman et al. 1983; CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates 1983, p 939–950). This new alternative to CABG may provide greater beneficial effects on cardiac rehabilitation in selected patients. To assess the potential socioeconomic impact of this new technique, we evaluated prospectively the work status of our first 158 patients before and after PTCA.

Keywords

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patient Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Group Coronary Artery Surgery Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida D, Bradford JM, Wenger NK, King SB, Hurst JW (1983) Return to work after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation [Suppl II] 68:205–213Google Scholar
  2. Boulay FM, David P, Bourassa MG (1982) Strategies for improving the work status of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation [Suppl III] 66:43–49Google Scholar
  3. Campeau L (1976) Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 54:522–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates (1983) Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation 68:939–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gosselin AJ, Fisher L, Judkins MP, Ryan TJ, Vliestra RE, Kemp HC, Gillespie MJ, Mock MB (1980) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: an estimate of the number of possible candidates for the CASS registry. In: Proceedings of the workshop on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. (NIH Publication No. 80–2030) National Institute of Health, Washington DC, p 89Google Scholar
  6. Grüntzig AR (1978) Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Lancet I:263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grüntzig AR, Senning A, Slegenthalter WE (1979) Non-operative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 301:61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamby RI, Katz S (1980) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: its potential impact on surgery for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 45:1161–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, English MT, Dodge MT (1979) Effect of surgical versus medical therapy on return to work in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 44:105–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holmes DR, Vlietstra RE, Mock MB, Smith HC, Cowley MJ, Kent KM, Detre KM (1982) Follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a report from the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Am J Cardiol 49:916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmes DR, Vlietstra RE, Mock MB, Smith HC, Dorros G, Cowley MJ, Kent KM, Hammes LN, Janke L, Elveback LR, Vetrovec GW (1983) Employment and recreation patterns in patients treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 52:710–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jang GC, Grüntzig AR, Block PC, Cowley MJ, Dorros G, Holmes DR, Kent KM, Leather-mann LL, Myler RK, Stertzer SH, Sjolander M, Williams DO (1982) Work profile of patients following coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery: results from a national cooperative study. Circulation [Suppl II] 66:123Google Scholar
  13. Johnson WD, Kayser KL, Pedraza PM, Shore RT (1982) Employment patterns in males before and after myocardial revascularization surgery. A study of 2229 consecutive male patients followed for as long as 10 years. Circulation 65:1086–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kent KM, Bentivoglio LG, Block PC, Cowley MJ, Dorros G, Gosselin AJ, Grüntzig A, Myler RK, Sympson J, Stertzer SH, Williams DO, Fisher L, Gillespie MJ, Detre K, Kelsey S, Mullin SM, Mock MB (1982) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Report from the registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am J Cardiol 49:2011–2020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Institutes of Health Consensus — Development Conference Statement (1981) Coronary artery bypass surgery. Scientific and clinical aspects. N Engl J Med 304:680–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oberman A, Wayne JB, Kouchoukos NT, Charles ED, Rüssel RO, Rogers WJ (1983) Employment status after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation [Suppl II] 65:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith HC, Hammes LN, Gupta S, Vlietstra RE, Elveback L (1982) Employment status after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation [Suppl II] 65:120–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR, Smith HC, Hartzler GO, Orszulak TA (1981) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: initial Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 56:287–293PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Boulay
  • P. David
  • P. R. David
  • M. G. Bourassa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations