Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Die Auswertung von zeitbezogenen Daten macht i.allg. die Anwendung spezieller statistischer Verfahren notwendig. Die Begründung hierfür liegt in der sog. „Abhängigkeit“ der Daten: Man nimmt im Gegensatz zur Querschnittuntersuchung an, daß die Daten eine gewisse „Trägheit“ oder ein „Beharrungsvermögen“ aufweisen. Diesen Effekt kann man auf physiologische Prozesse oder psychologische Ursachen wie „Erinnerungs“- und „Gewöhnungseffekte“ oder auch regelmäßig wiederkehrende äußere Einflüsse (wie z.B. regelmäßige Berufstätigkeit) zurückführen. Diese zeitliche Abhängigkeit der Daten wird auch Autokorreliertheit genannt. Die Verwendung „normaler“ statistischer Verfahren zur Analyse autokorrelierter Daten liefert verzerrte Prüfgrößen, die zu falschen Interpretationen führen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Anderson OD (1975) Time series analysis and forecasting: The Box-Jenkins approach. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TV (1978) Repeated measurements in autoregressive processes. J An Statist Assoc 73: 371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aström KJ, Bohlin T (1966) Numerical identification of linear dynamic systems from normal operating records. In: Hammond PH (ed) Theory of self-adaptive control systems. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett MS (1946) On the theoretical specifications of the sampling properties of autocorrelated time series. J R Statist Soc B. 8: 27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Pierce DA (1970) Distribution of residual autocorrelations in ARIMA time series models. J Am Statist Assoc. 64: 1509–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Tiao GC (1965) A change in level of a non-stationary time-series. Biometrika. 52: 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Tiao GC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J Am Statist Assoc. 70: 70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C (1975) The analysis of time-series: Theory and practice. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experiments: Nonequivalent control groups designs. In: Cook TD, Campbell TD (eds) Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. McNally, Chicago, pp 95–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley WW, Lohnes PR (1971) Multivariate data analysis. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1967) Statistical inference from N = 1 experiments. J Psychol. 65: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1969a) Statistical inference: The distribution free approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1969b) Approximate randomization tests. J Psychol. 72: 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1971) Randomization tests with statistical control over concomitant variables. J Psychol. 79: 13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1973) Randomization tests: Computer time requirements. J Psychol. 85: 89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1975a) Randomization tests for one-subject operant experiments. J Psychol. 90: 57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1975b) Randomization for predicted trends. Can Psychol Rev. 16: 49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1980) Randomization tests. Dekker, New York Fisher RA ( 1951 ) The design of experiments. Hafner, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass GV, Willson UL, Gottman JM (1975) Design and analysis of time-series experiments. Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman JM (1981) Time-series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman JM, Glass GV (1978) Analysis of interrupted time-series experiments. In: Kratochwill TR (ed) Single subject research: Stra-tegies for evaluating change. Academic Press, New York, pp 197–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs DA (1977) On analyzing the effects of policy interventions: BOX-JENKINS and BOX-TIAO vs. structural equation models. In: Heise DR (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, New York, pp 137–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman WH (1963) Statistical models for the study of change in the single case. In Harris C (ed) Problems in measuring change. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GM (1979) Practical experiences with modelling and fore-casting time series. GJP Ltd., Channel Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman EL (1975) Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin JR,. Marascuilo LA, Hubert LJ (1978) N = 1–Nonparametric randomization tests. In: Kratochwill TR (ed) Single subject research. Academic Press, New York, pp 167–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC (1978a) Forecasting - methods and applications. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC (1978b) Interactive forecasting.Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain LJ, McCleary R (1979) The statistical analysis of the simple interrupted time-series quasi-experiment. In: Cook TD

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (eds) Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. McNally, Chicago, pp 233–293

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleary R, Hay RA (1980) Applied time-series analysis for the social sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Möbus C, Nagl W (1983) Messung, Analyse und Prognose von Veränderun-gen. In: Bredenkamp J, Feger H (Hrsg) Hypothesenprüfung, Bd 5 der Serie Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie der Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Verlag für Psychologie, Göttingen, S 239–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Möbus C, Göricke G, Kröh PA (1983) Statistical analysis of single-case experimental designs: Conditional equivalence of the general-linear-model approach of Glass, Willson and Gottman with the intervention model of Box and Tiao. EDV in Med Biol. 14: 98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR (1973) Applied time-series analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Quenouille MH (1949) Approximate tests of correlation in time series. J R Statist Soc B. 11: 68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Revenstorf D (1979) Zeitreihenanalyse für klinische Daten: Methodik und Anwendungen. Beltz, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Revenstorf D, Keeser W (1979) Zeitreihenanalyse von Therapieverläu-fen. In: Petermann F, Hehl FJ (Hrsg) Einzelfallanalyse. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München, S 183–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß H (1974) Ökonometrie, 2. Aufl. Physica, Würzburg Wien

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Möbus, C., Göricke, G., Kröh, P. (1985). Parametrische und nichtparametrische Methoden der Einzelfallstatistik. In: Appelt, H., Strauß, B. (eds) Ergebnisse einzelfallstatistischer Untersuchungen in Psychosomatik und klinischer Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69817-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69817-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13512-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69817-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics