Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anforderungen an Analysen, Methoden, Reagenzien, Evaluationstechniken und -Systeme, Kostenanalysen, Kontroll- und Standardisierungsmaßnahmen; Instandhaltung, Kosten, Empfehlungen, Verordnungen, Richtlinien, Gesetze

  • Chapter
Methoden-, Reagenzien- und Geräte-Evaluation in der Laboratoriumsmedizin

Part of the book series: INSTAND-Schriftenreihe ((INSTAND,volume 4))

  • 37 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adams PA, Berman MC (1981) A kinetic standard for precise calibration of spectrophotometer cell temperature. Clin Chem 27: 753

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitchison J, Habbema JDF, Kay JW (1977) A critical comparison of two methods of statistical discrimination. Appl Statist 26: 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albath W (1970) Eichung medizinischer Geräte. Dtsch Ärztebl 48: 3628

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alstrom T, et al (1978) Recommendations concerning the collection of reference values in clinical chemistry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 35: 144

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Society for Quality Control, Statistical Committee (1973) Glossary and tables for statistical quality control. Milwaukee, WI

    Google Scholar 

  6. Analar" Standards for laboratory chemicals (1984) Bucknell DJ (ed) Publ for Analar Standards Ltd by BDH Chemicals LTD Poole, Dorset (GB)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aronson T, de Verdier CH, Groth T (1974) Factors influencing the quality of analytical methods — a system analysis. Clin Chem 20: 738

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arthur GL, Rawnsley HM (1977) Statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Advanced clinical chemistry check sample No. ACC-23. CCE Council on Clinical Chemistry, American Society of Clinical Pathologists

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barclay JE (1983) Special problems of cost analysis and cost-benefit analysis as applied to large multitest analyzers.J Autom Chem 5: 71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnett RN (1965) Scheme for comparison of quantitative methods. Am J Clin Pathol 43: 562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnett RN, Youden WJ (1970) A revised scheme for the comparison of quantitative methods. Am J Clin Pathol 54: 454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartels PH, Wied GL (1981) Automated image analysis in clinical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 75: 489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer S, Kennedy JW (1982) Applied statistics for the clinical laboratory. J Clin Lab Autom 2:35, 129, 209, 354; (1981) 1: 129, 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bayer PM, Engelhardt W, Fischer G, Fischer M, Nitsch P (1981) A model for a new evaluation system in clinical laboratories. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 19: 610

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bayse D (1979) Clinical chemistry proficiency testing. Past and future. Adv Autom Anal 1: 217

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beard J (1980) A simple rapid protocol for the evaluation of instrument applications. Clin Chem 26: 979

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bechtler G (1982) Provisional guideline for listing specifications of flame emission spectrometers. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20: 259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bechtler G, Haeckel R, Lappe H, Tausch W (1984) Guidlines for listing specifications of spectrometers in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22: 565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Belsey R (1984) Controlling the use of state testing. Pathologist 38: 474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergmeyer HU (1970) Empfehlungen der deutschen Gesellschaft für klinische Chemie. Standardisierung von Methoden zur Bestimmung von Enzymaktivitäten in biologischen FIüssigkeiten. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 8: 658

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergmeyer HU (1978) Developments in methodology of enzyme assays. In: Goldberg DM, Wilkinson JH: Enzymes in health and disease. S Karger Basel, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bergmeyer HU (1979) Development in methodology. In: Schmidt E, Schmidt FW, Trautschold I, Friedel R: Advances in clinical enzymology. S Karger Basel, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bergmeyer HU (1981) Thoughts on standardization in the eighties. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 19: 109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bergmeyer HU, Brent E, Gawehn K, Michal G (1974) Handling of biochemical reagents and samples. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Verlag Chemie Weinheim, Academic Press Inc, New York, London, p 165

    Google Scholar 

  25. Betteridge D, Goad TB (1981) The impact of microprocessors on analytical instrumentation. Analyst 106: 257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bienek KHP (1981) Vorbeugende Wartung — unentbehrliches Hilfsmittel der Systemverfügbarkeit. GIT FachZ Lab 25: 279

    Google Scholar 

  27. Blenk W (1978) Zum Fehlerbegriff im Richtlinienvorschlag "Produkthaftung der EG-Kommission. Der Betrieb 36:1725 Verlag Handelsblatt

    Google Scholar 

  28. Böhme HR; Ludewig R (1981) Zur Beeinflussung der Laboratoriumsdiagnostik durch Arzneimittel ( On the imingements of drugs on laboratory diagnosis ). Z med Lab diagn 22: 76

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boroviczény KG von (1966) Standardization. Documentation and normal values in haematology. Bibl Haemat, Karger Basel

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boroviczény KG von (1966) On the standardization of the blood cell counts. Standardization in haematology III. Bibl Haemat 24: 2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boroviczény KG von (1967) Basic requirements of automation equipment Brit J Haematol 13: 8

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boroviczény KG von (1970) Auswirkungen des Eichgesetzes. Dtsch Ärztebl 14: 1

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boroviczény KG von, Merten R (1972) Systematik der Qualitätskontrolle im medizinischen Laboratorium. Medicus-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boroviczény KG von (1982) Cost-analysis in clinical laboratories. Adv in Pathol 1: 463

    Google Scholar 

  35. Boroviczény KG von, Schröder F, Tischer C (1969) Über die Beurteilung von Laboratoriumsgeräten. GIT FachZ Lab 13: 450

    Google Scholar 

  36. Boroviczény KG von, Rammos G, Wolf I, Wrasmann A (1975) Allgemeine Gesichtspunkte zur Beurteilung und Prüfung von Analysengeräten. Med Lab (Stuttg) 28: 141

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bos M (1981) Microprocessors in laboratory automation. Naturwiss 1: 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bowie L, Esters F, Bolin J, Gochman N (1976) Development of an aqueous temperature — indicating technique and its application to clinical laboratory instrumentation. Clin Chem 22: 449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun T, Bujdoso E (1982) The growth of modern analytical chemistry as reflected in the statistical evaluation of its subject literature. Crit Rev Anal Chem 13: 223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brecher G (1980) The future of automation in hematology. Blood Cells 6: 111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bretaudiere JP, Dumont G, Rej R, Bailly M (1981) Suitability of control materials. General principles and methods of investigation. Clin Chem 27: 789

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brittin GA, Brecher G (1971) Instrumentation and automation in clinical hematology. Progr Hematol 7: 299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Broughton PMG, Buttolph MA, Gowenlock AH (1969) Recommended scheme for the evaluation of instruments for automatic analysis in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. J Clin Pathol 22: 278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Broughton PMG (1978) Evaluation of analytical methods in clinical chemistry. In: Stefanini M (ed) Progress in clinical pathology, Vol VII p 1. Grune and Stratton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Broughton PMG (1979) Evaluation of analytical methods in clinical chemistry. Progr Clin Pathol 17: 1

    Google Scholar 

  46. Broughton PMG, Gowenlock AH, McCormack JJ, Neill DW (1974) A revised scheme for the evaluation of automatic instruments for use in clinical chemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 11: 207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Broughton PMG, Carter TJN (1983) Instrumentation. Clin Biochem 16: 31 (R)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brown SS (1975) Acceptability of definitive, reference and routine methods, p 417 In: Anido G, van Kampen EJ, Rosalki SB, Rubin M (eds) Quality control in clinical chemistry. W de Gruyter Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  49. Büttner H, Hansert E, Stamm D (1974) Auswertung, Kontrolle und Beurteilung von Meßergebnissen. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse. Band 1: 339. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  50. Büttner J, Borth R, Boutwell JH, Broughton PMG, Bowyer RC (1979) IFCC Approved recommendation (1978) on quality control in clinical chemistry: Part 2. Assessment of analytical methods for routine use. Clin Chim Acta 98:145F; J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18: 78

    Google Scholar 

  51. Büttner J, Borth R, Boutwell JH, Broughton PMG, Bowyer RC (1981) Approved recommendation (1979) on quality control in clinical chemistry. Part 3. Calibration and control materials. Clin Chim Acta 109:105, reprinted in: J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18:855

    Google Scholar 

  52. Burnett D, Barbour HM, Woods TF (1981) Method comparisons, influence of the number, distribution and range of samples on performance claims. J Autom Chem 3: 173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cali JP (1975) International criteria for reference materials. In: Anido G, van Kampen EJ, Rosalki SB, Rubin M (eds) Quality control in clinical chemistry. Transactions of the 6th International Symposium, Geneva. W de Gruyter, Berlin — New York

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cartwright H (1982) Standards for laboratory accreditation. Pathologist 36: 641

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cembrowski GS, Westgard JO, Conover WJ, Toren EC (1979) Statistical analysis of method comparison data. Testing normality. Am J Clin Pathol 72: 21

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen IW (1980) Commercially available fully automated systems for radioligand assays. Part 1: Overview. Part 2: Performance characteristics. Ligand Rev Baltimore 2: 46, 3: 46

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cobb M, Gotcher S (1982) Fluorescence immunoassay in the clinical laboratory. Am J Med Technol 48: 671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. College of American Pathologists (1981) Diagnostic Immunology Resource Committee Minutes.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cornbleet PJ, Shea MC (1978) Comparison of product moment and rank correlation coefficients in the assessment of laboratory method-comparison data. Clin Chem 24: 857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N (1979) Incorrect least-aquares regression coefficients in method comparison analysis. Clin Chem 25: 432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Craig Th (1980) Decision criteria for the selection of analytical instruments in clinical chemistry. Techniques for the economic evaluation of automatic analyzers. J Autom Chem 2: 34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Craig TM (1981) Automated systems — the user’s needs from a manufacturers point of view. J Autom Chem 3: 63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Curry RE, Heitzman H, Riege DH, Sweet RV, Simonsen MG (1979) A systems approach to fluorescent immunoassay: General principles and representative applications. Clin Chem 25: 1591

    Google Scholar 

  64. Deindoerfer FH, Boris WB, Gangwer JR, Laird CW, Tittsler JW (1982) Automated intelligent microscopy ( AIM) and its potential application in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 28: 1910

    Google Scholar 

  65. DeLange JA, Rutten WPF, Schmidt NA, Eernisse JG, Veltkamp JJ (1976) Automation in the hematology laboratory. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 14: 485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Deutsches Arzneibuch (1978) 8. Ausgabe und Europäische Pharmacopöe, Deutsche Ausgabe, Band 1–3. 1. Nachtrag 1980, 2. Nachtrag 1983. Deutscher Apotheker-Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  67. Deutsche Industrie Norm (DIN) 58960 (1978) Photometer für analytische Tests. Beuth Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  68. Deutsche Industrie Norm (DIN) 57789 (1980) Teil 200. Sicherheitsbestimmungen für elektrische Geräte der medizinischen Labortechnik und verwandter Bereiche.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Donohoe GA, Geary TD, Jennings RD (1982) Evaluation of instrumentation in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20: 931

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Drewinko B, Wallace B, Flores C, Crawford RW, Trujillo JM (1977) Computerized hematology: Operation of a high volume hematology laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 67: 64

    Google Scholar 

  71. Driscoll JL, Gudzinowicz BJ, Martin HF, Fanger H (1981) Instrument justification, selection and technical evaluation in clinical chemistry. P 2. Technical aspects of instrument evaluation. Chem Biomed Environ Instrum 11: 127

    Google Scholar 

  72. Driscoll RC, Edwards RB, Liston MD, Love TW, Mazza JC, Trafton JE (1983) Discrete automated chemistry system with tableted reagents. Clin Chem 29: 1609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Edmonds CG (1983) A bibliography of combined liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Biomed Mass Spectrometry 10: 237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Eisenwiener HG (1976) Voraussetzungen zur Erzielung zuverlässiger klinisch-chemischer Analysenergebnisse. Med Labor (Stuttg) 29: 171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Eisenwiener HG, Bablok W, Bardorff W, Bender R, Markowetz D, Passing H, Spaethe R, Specht W (1983) Präzisionsangaben bei Methodenvergleich. Lab med 7: 273

    Google Scholar 

  76. Eksborg S (1981) Evaluation of method-comparison data. Clin Chem 27: 1311 (L)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ellis KJ, Morrison JF (1975) Some sources of errors and artifacts in spectrophotometric measurements. Clin Chem 21: 776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Epstein MS (1982) Provision guidelines for listing specifications of atomic absorption spectrometers. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20: 263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Erb W (1976) Fehlerursachen bei Spektralphotometern für die klinische Chemie. PTB Mitt 86: 168

    Google Scholar 

  80. Evenson MA (1979) Criteria for analytical instrumentation in a clinical analysis laboratory. Anal Chem 51:1411 A

    Google Scholar 

  81. Fareed J, Messmore HL, Bermes EW (1981) New perspectives in coagulation testing. Clin Chem 26:1380 Review

    Google Scholar 

  82. Feldmann U, Schneider B, Klinkers H, Haeckel R (1981) A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytic methods in clinic chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 19: 121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Fischer A (1983) Energie und Kosteneinsparung durch flexible Laborautomatisierung mit zentraler Leittechnik. GIT FachZ Lab 27: 89

    Google Scholar 

  84. Flagle CD (1970) Evaluation techniques for medical information systems. Comput Biomed Res 3: 407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Frei J, Lauber K (1972) Recommandations internationales pour une standardisation logique de l’expression des résultats en chimie clinique. Dtsch Ärztebl 34: 1105

    Google Scholar 

  86. Frings CS, Broussard LA (1979) Calibration and monitoring of spectrometers and spectrophotometers. Clin Chem 25: 1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Galen RS (1979) Laboratory medicine in the year 2000: an overview. MLO 11: 40

    Google Scholar 

  88. Galli A (1980) Analytical interferences of drugs. In: Siest G (ed) Drug effects on laboratory test results. Developments in clinical biochemistry. Nijhoff Publ, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  89. Galteau MM, Siest G (1984) Drug effects in clinical chemistry. Part 2 Guidelines for evaluation of analytical interference. J Clin Chem CIin Biochem 22: 275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Gates SC, Sweeley CC (1978) Quantitative metabolic profiling based on gas chromatography. Clin Chem 24:1663 Review

    Google Scholar 

  91. Geary TD (1980) Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical laboratory instrumentation. The Clin Biochemist 1: 26

    Google Scholar 

  92. Geary TD (1980) Guidelines for the selection and evaluation of analytical methods. The Clin Biochemist 1: 51

    Google Scholar 

  93. Geary TD (1982) Provisional guidelines for listing specifications of flame emmission spectrometers. Clin Biochem 15: 123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Geary TD (1982) Provisional guidelines for listing specifications of absorption spectrometers. Clin Biochem 15: 125

    Google Scholar 

  95. Georges RF (1984) The evaluation of analytical instrumentation for the clinical chemistry laboratory: Review and bibliography. S Afr J Med Lab Technol, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gerbet D, Richardot P, Auget JL, Maccario J, Cazalet C, Raichvarg D, Ekindjian OG, Yonger J (1983) New statistical approach in biochemical method-comparison studies by using Westlake’s procedure, and its application to continuous-flow, centrifugal analysis, and multilayer film analysis techniques. Clin Chem 29: 1131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Gergely TH, Hauch D, Bayer PM, Pall H, Gibitz H, Gabl F (1978) Mechanisierte Analytik im Akut-Laboratorium. Med Labor (Stuttg) 32: 281

    Google Scholar 

  98. Gergely TH (1980) Arztliche und technische Leistung im medizinischen Laboratorium. VII. Vergleich der Betriebskosten von selektiver Analytik (GSA II) und Profilanalytik (SMAC) im Routinebetrieb. Lab med 4 (A+B): 45

    Google Scholar 

  99. Gesetze, Verordnungen, Richtlinien, Empfehlungen

    Google Scholar 

  100. Gesetz uber das Meß- und Eichwesen (Eichgesetz) vom 11. Juli 1969. (Bundesgesetzblatt vom 15. Juli 1969 Teil I, 759–770 - Verordnung über Ausnahmen von der Eichpflicht (Eichpflichtausnahmeverordnung) vom 26. Juni 1970, Bundesgesetzblatt vom 30. Juni 1970, Teil II, 960–965, in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 11. Dezember 1976, (Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I, 3704), - Neufassung des Eichgesetzes in Vorbereitung

    Google Scholar 

  101. Hochschulbauförderungsgesetz vom 1. September 1969 (Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 1556 ) in der Fassung des Gesetzes zur Änderung vom 3. September 1970 ( Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 1301 )

    Google Scholar 

  102. Krankenhausfinanzierungsgesetz (KHG) vom 29. Juni 1972 (Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 1009 ) Textausgabe mit Materialien, bearbeitet von Karl Jung ( 1982 ), Verlag W. Kohlhammer

    Google Scholar 

  103. Krankenhaus-Kosten-Dämpfungsgesetz vom 12. Dezember 1981 (Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 1568 )

    Google Scholar 

  104. Leitfaden für die Organisationsarbeit “Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnungen”. Herausgegeben vom Senator für Inneres, Berlin Ab.V, 2. Erweiterte Auflage 1974 (Eigendruck)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Reichsversicherungsordnung (RVO) C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München

    Google Scholar 

  106. Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Durchführung der statistischen Qualitätskontrolle und von Ringversuchen im Bereich der Heilkunde. Aufgestellt aufgrund § 6 (2) Satz 2 der Verordnung über Ausnahmen von der Eichpflicht vom 26. Juni 1970, Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 960, im Benehmen mit der Physikalisch-Technischen Bundesanstalt und den zuständigen Behörden. Dtsch Ärzteblatt 68:2228, 1971 und 71: 959 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Richtlinien der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung vom 11.Mai 1982 über die Arbeitsweise und die medizinischen Erfordernisse bei der Erbringung von Laboratoriumsleistungen. Lab med (Mainz) 6 (A+B):84

    Google Scholar 

  108. Richtlinien für die interne Qualitätskontrolle bei Bindungsanalysen (Radio-Immuno-Assays und Enzym-Immuno-Assays und dergleichen). Lab med (Mainz) 2 (A+B): 88 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Abgrenzungsverordnung vom 5. Dezember 1977, DKI-Gutachten, veröffentlicht in “Das Krankenhaus” 1971, Nr. 9, Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 2355

    Google Scholar 

  110. Berliner Haushaltsrecht, herausgegeben vom Senator für Finanzen, Berlin 1979 ( Eigendruck )

    Google Scholar 

  111. Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Üsterreichischen Gesellschaft für Laboratoriumsmedizin und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Gesellschaft für Immunologie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Bluttransfusion und Immunhämatologie, Institut für Standardisierung und Dokumentation im medizinischen Laboratorium e.V. (INSTAND), Verband der Diagnostica- und Diagnosticageräte-Hersteller (1980) Standardisierung von Immunfluoreszenzmethoden. Lab med (Mainz) 4 (A+B): 15 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Empfehlungen der Üsterreichischen Gesellschaft für Qualitätssicherung und Standardisierung medizinisch-diagnostischer Untersuchungen (OQUASTA) (1980) Qualitätskontrolle in der Laboratoriumsmedizin. Lab med 6 (A+B): 146

    Google Scholar 

  113. Vorschläge der Standardisierungskommission der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie. (1980) Vorschläge zur Auswahl, Beschreibung, Prüfung und Veröffentlichung ausgewählter Methoden. Lab med 4 (A+B): 103

    Google Scholar 

  114. Gilmer PRjr, Williams LJ, Koepke JA, Bull BS (1977) Calibration methods for automated haematology instruments. Am J Clin Pathol 68 (Suppl): 185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Gilmer PR, Williams LJ (1980) The status of methods of calibration in hematology. Am J Clin Pathol 74: 600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Glick D (1978) The future of clinical microchemical analysis. Clin Chem 24: 189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Gorus F, Schram E (1979) Applications of bio- and chemiluminescence in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 25:512 Review

    Google Scholar 

  118. Gozzo ML, Barbaresi G, Giocoli G, Zappacosta B, Zuppi C (1984) Long term retrospective control procedures for monitoring analytical performance of laboratory instruments. Clin Chem 30: 149

    Google Scholar 

  119. Greyson J (1981) Problems and possibilities of chemistry on dry reagent carriers. J Autom Chem 3: 66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Griesser G, Wagner G (1968) Automatisierung des klinischen Laboratoriums. Schattauer Verlag Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  121. Griffiths PD, Martin BT, Cannon G (1980) The philosophy of instrument evaluation, In: Price CP, Spencer K (eds) Centrifugal analysers in clinical chemistry. Eastbourne, Praeger Publ

    Google Scholar 

  122. Grin AS, Lukicheva TI, Tatsievskij VA (1975) Some methods of evaluating the work of automatic analytical systems under conditions of the clinico-biochemical laboratory. Med Tekh (in russian with an abstract in english) 5: 27

    Google Scholar 

  123. Groner W, Tycko D (1980) Characterizing blood cells by biophysical measurements in flow. Blood Cells 6: 141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Groth T (1980) Methods and approaches to determine “optimal” quality for clinical chemical data. In: Horder M (ed) Assessing quality requirements in clinical chemistry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 40 (Suppl 155 ) 47

    Google Scholar 

  125. Grouse LD (1983) Has the machine become the physician? J Am Med Ass 250: 1891 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Gudzinowicz BJ, Driscoll JL, Martin HF, Fanger H (1981) Instrument justification, selection and technical evaluation in clinical chemistry. Instrument justification and selection. Chem Biomed Environ Instrum 11: 107

    Google Scholar 

  127. Gulati G, Hyun BH, Ashton JK (1984) Hematology instruments for clinical laboratories. Laboratory Medicine 15: 406

    Google Scholar 

  128. Haeckel R (1980) Statistische Probleme beim Vergleich von klinisch-chemischen Analysen-Verfahren. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18: 433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Haeckel R (1981) Erprobung und Bewertung von Geräten der Laboratoriummsmedizin. I Standardisierung der Evaluation von Analysengeräten. Lab med 5 (A+B): 1

    Google Scholar 

  130. Haeckel R (1981) Standardisierung der Evaluation von Analysengeräten. GIT Lab Med 1: 13

    Google Scholar 

  131. Haeckel R (1981) Statistische Verfahren beim Methodenvergleich. Med Lab (Stuttg) 34: 8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Haeckel R (1982) Empfehlungen zur Anwendung statistischer Methoden beim Vergleich klinisch-chemischer Analysenverfahren. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20: 107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Haeckel R (1982) Standardisation efforts for evaluating instruments in clinical chemistry. Adv Clin Chem 1: 255

    Google Scholar 

  134. Haeckel R (1983) Introduction to cost-benefit analysis. J Autom Chem 5: 68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Haeckel R (1984) Statistische Probleme beim Vergleich klinisch-chemischer Analysenverfahren. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22: 265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Haeckel R, Höpfel P (1973) Analysenautomaten, Grenzen der Anwendung. diagnostik 6: 674

    Google Scholar 

  137. Haeckel R, Höpfel P (1980) Fehlersuche bei photometrischen Messungen im medizinischen Laboratorium. Dtsch Ärztebl 42: 11

    Google Scholar 

  138. Haeckel R, Rotzler A (1977) Photometer für die ärztliche Praxis. Band 1 des Zentralinstitutes für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Deutscher Ärzteverlag, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  139. Haeckel R, Keller H, Knedel M (1980) Principles for Multi-Centre-Evaluations of analytical instruments.J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18: 693

    Google Scholar 

  140. Haeckel R, Collombel CH, Geary TD, Mitchell FL, Nadeau RG, Okuda K (1980) Provisional Guidelines (1979) for listing specifications of spectrometers in clinical chemistry. Clin Chim Acta 103:249 F, J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18:445, Clin Chem (1981) 27: 187

    Google Scholar 

  141. Haeckel R, Keller R, Knedel M (1980) Recommendations for Multi-Centre-Evaluations of analytical instruments in clinical chemistry. Mitt Dtsch Ges Klin Chem 11: 184

    Google Scholar 

  142. Haeckel R, Sonntag O (1980) Detection of drug interferences in method evaluation programs. In: Siest G (ed) Drug effects on laboratory test results. Developments in clinical biochemistry. Nijhoff Publ p 58

    Google Scholar 

  143. Haeckel R, Schneider B (1980) Statistische Modelle und Verfahren beim Vergleich der Analysenmethoden. GIT Lab med 3: 97, 103

    Google Scholar 

  144. Haeckel R, Schneider B (1981) Statistische Verfahren beim Methodenvergleich. Med Labor (Stuttg) 34: 8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Hall PE (1978) The World Health Organization’s programme for the standardization and quality control of radio-immuno-assay of hormones in reproductive physiology. Horm Res 9: 440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Hamlin WB, Duckworth JK, Gilmer PRjr, Stevens MV (1974) Laboratory instrument maintenance and function verification. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Hansten PD (1974) Arzneimittel-Interaktionen. Aus dem Engl. von Gugler R, Hengstmann JH, Hippokrates Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  148. Harris EK (1979) Statistical principles underlying analytic goal setting in clinical chemistry. Am J Clin Pathol 72: 374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Harris EK, Yasaka T, Horton MR, Shakarji G (1982) Comparing multivariate and univariate subject-specific reference regions for blood constituents in healthy persons. Clin Chem 28: 422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Hartmann AE (1983) Validation protocol for new methods or instruments in the clinical laboratory. Laboratory Medicine 14: 411

    Google Scholar 

  151. Helman EZ, Reingold IM, Gleason IO (1971) Plea for standardisation of commercial calibration materials for automated instruments. Clin Chem 11: 1144

    Google Scholar 

  152. Herkner K (1984) Die Verwendung der Radiogaschromatographie (RGC) im endokrinologischen Labor. GIT Lab Med 7: 17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Hiatt MK, Kiser EJ (1980) Liquid chromatography. A review of methods and equipment. Lab World 31: 39

    Google Scholar 

  154. Hieftje GM (1983) New techniques and tools for clinical chemistry — Advances spectrometry. Clin Chem 29: 1659

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Hieke H, Kos HJ, Nink R (1984) Ergebnisse von meßtechnischen Untersuchungen an Spektralphotometern — Teil 2. GIT FachZ Lab 28: 166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Hutten H (1979) Welche Kriterien sind für die Qualität medizin-technischer Geräte entscheidend? Biomed Technik 24: 353 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  157. Hutten H (1983) Absehbare Konsequenzen neuer Gesetze im Gesundheitswesen: Einführung in das Gerätesicherheitsgesetz - § 8 a Medizin-technische Geräte. Medizintechnik 103: 43

    Google Scholar 

  158. Hutten H (1983) Medizin-technischer Service im Krankenhaus. Arzt und Krankenhaus 12: 302

    Google Scholar 

  159. Hutten H, Anna O (1984) Der medizin-technische Service im Krankenhaus Krankenhaus-Umschau 53: 163

    Google Scholar 

  160. Hutten H (1984) Überlegungen zur Einrichtung und Bewertung des medizin-technischen Dienstes im Krankenhaus. Biomed Technik 29: 66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. ISO: International Organization for Standardization, Genf ISO Guide 6: Mention of reference materials in international standards (1981) ISO Guide 31: The contents of certificates of reference materials. (1982) ISO Directory of vertified reference materials (1982) ISO 6353: Reagents for chemical analysis. Part 1: General test methods. Part 2: Specifications

    Google Scholar 

  162. Jackson JA, Conrad ME (1984) New instrumentation in urinanalysis. Pathologist 10: 652

    Google Scholar 

  163. James GP (1981) Evaluation of clinical laboratory instruments. In: Defining laboratory needs. Med Technol 47: 225

    Google Scholar 

  164. James GP, Bee DE (1981) Evaluation of clinical laboratory instruments Use and abuse of statistical tools. Med Technol 47: 303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Jansen RTP, Pijpers FW, de Valk GAJM (1981) A technique for the objective assessment of routine analytical methods in clinical laboratories using pattern recognition. Ann Clin Biochem 18: 218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Jansen RTP, Pijpers FW, de Valk GAJM (1982) Application of pattern recognition for discrimination between routine analytical methods used in clinical laboratories. Ann Chim Acta 133: 1

    Google Scholar 

  167. Johnson T (1984) New developments in spectrofluorometry. Pathologist 38: 20

    Google Scholar 

  168. Joppich-Kuhn R, Joppich M, Giese RW (1982) Release Tags: A new class of analytical reagents. Clin Chem 28: 1844

    Google Scholar 

  169. Kaiser H (1973) Grundlagen zur Beurteilung von Analysenverfahren. In: Houben-Weyl, Methodicum chimicum, Vol I, p 1, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  170. Kaiser R, Gottschalk G (1972) Elementare Tests zur Beurteilung von Meßdaten. Bibliographisches Institut, Wissenschaftsverlag Mannheim Karselis TC (1982) Electrolyte instrumentation: Then and now. Med Technol 48: 329

    Google Scholar 

  171. Keilges PW, Mohrbacher RJ (1982) Reagents, specimen collection, calibrators, reference materials and standards, p 289 in: Werner M, Seligson C (eds) CRC Handbook of clinical chemistry Vol. 1. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  172. Keller H (1978) Ärztliche und technische Leistung im medizinischen Laboratorium. Der laborärztliche Befund. Lab med 2 (A+B): 79

    Google Scholar 

  173. Keller H, Gessner U (1981) Über ein neues probabilistisches Verfahren zur Interpretation von Laborresultaten. Z med Lab Diagn 22: 179

    Google Scholar 

  174. Keller H, Staber G (1983) Arzneimittel-Interferenzen bei klinisch-chemischen Testen. Lab med 7: 164

    Google Scholar 

  175. Kennedy WR (1983) “Calibrant”. Analyt Chem 55:704 A

    Google Scholar 

  176. Ketterer K (1984) Ionensensitive Meßtechnik in der Medizin. 1. Teil: Stand der ionensensitiven Meßtechnik in der klinischen Medizin. Ein Elektrolyt-Analysator der 3. Generation mit neuer, bahnbrechender Elektrodentechnologie. GIT Lab med 7: 129

    Google Scholar 

  177. Kim EK, Logan JE (1978) Scheme for the evaluation of methods in clinical chemistry with particular application to those measuring enzyme activities. Part I: General considerations. Part II: Analysis of data and performance assessment. Clin Biochem 11: 238, 244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Kirk C, Peel N, James K, Kershaw Y (1978) Basic medical laboratory technology. Am J Med Technol 44: 73

    Google Scholar 

  179. Klein-Wisenberg A von (1970) Welches Photometer wann? Ärztl Lab 16: 283

    Google Scholar 

  180. Klein-Wisenberg A von, Boroviczény KG von (1967) Standardisierung der Photometrie am Beispiel der Hämoglobinbestimmung.GIT FachZ Lab 11: 1060

    Google Scholar 

  181. Knapp W, Holubar K, Wick G (eds) Immunfluorescence and related staining techniques. Amsterdam: North Holland Biomedical Press

    Google Scholar 

  182. Knoll E, Wisser H (1984) Probleme bei der Entwicklung eines Radioimmunoassay für Katecholamine. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22: 741

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Knüppel W, Neumeier D, Fateh-Moghadam, Knedel M (1982) Einsatz eines vollmechanisierten Elektrophoresegerätes mit rechner-unterstützter Auswertung und Befunderstellung in einem klinisch-chemischen Institut. Teil I: Systemvoraussetzungen und Methodik. GIT Lab med 5: 121

    Google Scholar 

  184. Koch CD, Arnst E, Rommel K (1981) Datenverarbeitung in der klinischen Chemie: Istzustand und Kritik des ‘Clinical Lab 12’-System. Ärztl Lab 27: 10

    Google Scholar 

  185. Koepke JA (1977) The calibration of automated instruments for accuracy in hemoglobinometry. Am J Clin Pathol 68 (Suppl): 180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. Kreiser MJ, van der Kolk BW (1982) Leasing analytical instrument advantages, disadvantages and contract procedures. J Forensic Sci 27: 598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Kutter D (1982) Vorschläge zur rationellen Optimierung der Harnmikroskopie. Med Lab (Stuttg) 35: 27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Laurell CB (1965) Electroimmunoassay. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 28 (Suppl124): 21

    Google Scholar 

  189. Layton JM (1983) Requirements for accreditation of programs. Pathologist 37: 97

    Google Scholar 

  190. Lehnert G, Rutenfranz J, Szadkowski D, Valentin H (1981) Richtlinien zur Durchführung der statistischen Qualitätssicherung bei arbeits-medizinisch-toxikologischen Analysen. Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin, Präventivmedizin 16: 56

    Google Scholar 

  191. Liebscher W (1984) Die Schreibung chemischer Fachwörter. Z med Lab diagn 25: 58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. Ljungdahl L, Gerhardt W, Hofvendahl S, Börjesson J (1983) How to make better test evaluations. Clin Chem 29: 738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Lloyd PH (1978) Technical Bulletin No. 39: A scheme for the evaluation of diagnostic kits. Ann Clin Biochem 15: 136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Logan JE (1981) Criteria for Kit selection in clinical chemistry. Clinical Biochemistry. Contemporary Theories and Techniques, Vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  195. Logan JE (1983) Revised recommendation on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part I: Recommendation for specifications on labelling of clinical laboratory materials. Part II: Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical chemistry kits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21: 893, 899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Logan JE, Bayse DD, Koedam JC, Mather A, Wilding P (1984) IFCC/WHO principles and recommendations on evaluation of diagnostic reagent sets used in health laboratories with limited resources. Part III: Selection and evaluation using reference materials. General considerations. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22:573 Part IV: Evaluation of performance using reference materials of analytes commonly determined in blood serum or plasma. J Clin Chem CIin Biochem 22: 817

    Google Scholar 

  197. Long CD, Winefordner JD (1983) Limit of detection. Analyt Chem 55:712 724 A

    Google Scholar 

  198. Lorbacher P (1983) Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der automatisierten Blutbild-Differenzierung mit zytochemischen Methoden. mta-journal 5: 2

    Google Scholar 

  199. Louderback AL, Szatkowski PR (1980) The coefficient of analysis, a new figure of merit for laboratory performance. Clin Chem 26: 774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. L’vov BV (1978) Electrothermal atomization — the way toward absolute methods of atomic absorption spectroscopy.Spectrochim Acta 33B: 153

    Google Scholar 

  201. Maclin E, Rohlfing D, Ansour M (1973) Relationship between variables in instrument performance and results of kinetic enzyme assays — a system view. Clin Chem 19: 832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  202. Markowetz D (1982) Vorschlag zur deskriptiven Auswertung multivariater Studien. Med Lab (Stuttg) 35: 53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. Marsh WL, Nelson DP, Koenig HM (1983) Hematofluorometer. Am J Clin Pathol 79: 655

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Martinek RG (1981) The selection of instruments for the clinical laboratory. Am J Med Technol 43: 123

    Google Scholar 

  205. Massart DL, Dijkstra A, Kaufmann L (eds) (1978) Evaluation and optimization of laboratory methods and analytical procedures. Elsevier Amsterdam, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  206. McFarren EF (1970) Criterion for judging acceptability of analytic methods. Anal Chem 42: 358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  207. McLafferty FW, Lory ER (1981) Mass spectrometry as a separation technique. Analysis of involatile samples. J Chromatogr 203: 109

    Google Scholar 

  208. McLean MH (1979) Product evaluation — a manufacturers point of view. Clin Chem 25: 1127 (Abstr 323)

    Google Scholar 

  209. McLelland AS, Fleck A, Burns RF (1978) A limited protocol for assessment of within-batch performance of multichannel analysers. Ann Clin Biochem 15: 12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  210. Meier PC, Ammann D, Osswald HF (1977) Ion-selective electrodes in clinical chemistry. Med Progr Technol 5:1 Review

    Google Scholar 

  211. Mitchell FL (1982) Comparison between problems with clinical laboratory instruments in developed and developing countries. In: Khayat MH, Montalbetti N, Ceriotti G, Bonini PA (eds) AMNECC Adv Clin Chem. AMNECC Office, Milano, IFCC: Vol 1: 247

    Google Scholar 

  212. Mitchell FL, Lewis SM, Jenkins WJ, et al (1981) The impact of technology on medicine: The impact of technology on clinical pathology over the last 25 years. J Med Eng Tech 5: 13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  213. Monroe L (1982) Radioligand assay: Current trends in automation. Med Technol 48: 663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. Mosel HA von der (1983) Grundlagen der Logistik beim Kauf medizinischer Geräte. Krankenhaus-Umschau 52: 10

    Google Scholar 

  215. Müller DH, Schmohl E (1982) Steuerung der Service-Aktivitäten anhand von Service-Berichten und -Rechnungen. 9. Fortbildungsveranstaltung des Fachbereichs Technisches Gesundheitswesen der FH Gießen-Friedberg

    Google Scholar 

  216. Müller F (1979) Entwicklung und gegenwärtiger Stand der präparativen und optischen Technik für die fluoreszenzimmunologische Diagnostik Ärztl Lab 7: 163

    Google Scholar 

  217. Narayanan S (1977) An evaluation of methods monitoring enzyme activity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service No. CC-104

    Google Scholar 

  218. Naus IAJM (1983) Addendum to a paper on method-comparison analysis. Clin Chem 29: 1697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  219. NCCLS ASI-1 Preparation of manuals for installation, operation and repair of laboratory instruments. NCCLS Draft document EP9P Proposed guidelines for user comparison of quantitative clinical laboratory methods using patient samples.

    Google Scholar 

  220. NCCLS Tentative guidelines for manufacturers for establishing performance claims for clinical chemical methods. EP2T Introduction and performance check. EP3T Replication experiment. EP4T Comparison of methods experiment. EP5T Tentative guidelines for user evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices.

    Google Scholar 

  221. NCCLS TSI-3 Standard for determining spectrophotometer performance criteria (1976) TSI-5 Power requirements for clinical laboratory instruments and for laboratory power lines. TSI-6 Guidelines for service of clinical laboratory instruments.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Neely WE, Zettner A (1983) Reflectance digital matrix photometry. Clin Chem 29: 1088

    Google Scholar 

  223. Netheler N (1977) Absorptionsphotometrie. In: Bergmeyer HU, Gawehn K (eds) Grundlagen der enzymatischen Analyse. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, New York, p 145

    Google Scholar 

  224. Neumann E (1983) Mechanisierung im hämatologischen Laboratorium. Lab Med 7 (A+B): 123

    Google Scholar 

  225. Nielsen LG, Ash KO (1978) Protocol for adaption of analytic methods in the clinical chemistry laboratory. Am J Med Technol 44: 30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. O’Donnell CM, Winefordner (1975) The potential of phosphorescence spectrometry in clinical chemistry — the new generation of instrumentation and methodology. Clin Chem 21:285 Review

    Google Scholar 

  227. Oellerich M (1980) Enzyme immunoassays in clinical chemistry: present status and trends. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18: 197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. Okuda K (1980) Provisional guidelines for listing specifications of clinical chemical analysers. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18: 947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  229. O’Leary TD, Badenoch JL, Bais R (1983) Optical methods for monitoring temperature in spectrophotometric analysers. Ann Clin Biochem 20: 153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Osburg K (ed) (1984) Personalbedarf und Kosten im medizinischen Laboratorium. Anleitung zur Ermittlung. In: INSTAND-Schriftenreihe, Band 1, 2. überarbeitete Auflage. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  231. O’Sullivan MB (1979) Laboratory hematology procedures. In: Seligson D (ed) Critical reviews in clinical laboratory science, CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  232. O’Sullivan MJ, Bridges JW, Marks SV (1979) Enzyme immunoassay: a review. Ann Clin Biochem 16: 221

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Panek E, Young DS, Bente J (1978) Analytical interferences of drugs in clinical chemistry. Am J Med Technol 44: 217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  234. Passing H, Bablok W (1983) A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21: 709

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  235. Passing H, Bablok W (1984) Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry part II. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22: 431

    Google Scholar 

  236. Paulson RE (1964) Test methods in spectrophotometry. Stray-light determination. Appl Optics 3: 99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. Peake MJ, Pejakovic M, Fraser CG (1984) The effect of instrument variables on calculation factors for standardisation of colorimetric analyses. Ann Clin Biochem 21: 188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Peddecord KM, Cada RL (1980) Clinical laboratory proficiency test performance. Its relationship to structural, process and environmental variables. Am J Clin Pathol 73: 380

    Google Scholar 

  239. Percy-Robb IW, Broughton PMG, Jennings RD, et al (1980) Recommended scheme for evaluation of kits in the clinical chemistry laboratory Ann CIin Biochem 17: 217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  240. Petersen KF (1974) Mechanisierte Analysensysteme im medizinisch-diagnostischen Laboratorium. Med Labor (Stuttg) 27: 159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  241. Pinkerton PH, Wood DE, Burnie KL, Carstairs KC, Croucher BEE, Ezer S, Ley DCH, McBride JA, Murray JF, Quantz MC (1980) Proficiency testing in immunohematology in Ontario, Canada, 1975–1977. J Clin Chem CIin Biochem 18: 559

    Google Scholar 

  242. Price CP, Spencer K, Whicher J (1983) Light-scattering immunoassay of specific proteins: a review. Ann Clin Biochem 20: 1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  243. Pryor LR, Freeman VD (1979) An archival system for clinical laboratory data. Am J Clin Pathol 72: 1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  244. Raderecht HF (1972) Bedeutung und Probleme der Einführung technischer und volImechanischer Systeme sowie der Datenverarbeitung in die diagnostischen Laboratorien des Gesundheitswesens. Dtsch Ges. wesen 27: 1768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  245. Rake H (1983) Forschung in Deutschland. Quo Vadis? Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Automatisierungstechnik. GIT FachZ Lab 27: 926

    Google Scholar 

  246. Rapp U (1983) Anwendung moderner MS-Automatisierungstechnik. GIT FachZ Lab 27: 828

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  247. Rasch D, Herrendorfer G, Bock J, Busch K (1978) Verfahrensbibliothek, Versuchsplanung und -auswertung. VEB Dtsch Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin 1: 447

    Google Scholar 

  248. Rautela GS, Snee RD, Miller WK (1979) Response-surface co-optimization of reaction conditions in clinical chemical methods. Clin Chem 25: 1954

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  249. Rhoads DG (1981) New PDP-8A Computer program (Dataio) for handling data from automated systems. Clin Chem 27: 509 (L)

    Google Scholar 

  250. Richterich R, Greiner R (1970) Analysatoren in der klinischen Chemie. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 8: 588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  251. Roberts LB (1978) Practical and organisational problems in the testing of clinical laboratory instruments. J Autom Chem 1: 32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  252. Robertson EA, Zweig MH (1981) Use of receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the clinical performance of analytical systems. Clin Chem 27: 1569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  253. Robertson EA, Zweig MH, van Steirteghem AC (1983) Evaluating the clinical efficacy of laboratory tests. Am J Clin Pathol 79: 78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  254. Rocks R, Riley C (1982) Flow-injection analysis: a new approach to quantitative measurements in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 28: 409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  255. Rodgerson DO, Tietz NW (1975) Selection of “recommended methods” for use in a clinical laboratory — some urgent considerations and a suggested approach. Clin Chem 21: 1057

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  256. Rösler-Englhardt A (1982) Erprobung und Bewertung von Geräten der Laboratoriumsmedizin. III. Gerätetechnische Optimierung im medizinischen Laboratorium. Lab med 6 (A+B): 1

    Google Scholar 

  257. Roka L (1982) Photometrische Gerinnungsanalysen mit synthetischen Substraten. Lab med 6 (A+B): 192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  258. Ross DL (1982) The laboratory environment: 1990–2000. Med Technol 48: 282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  259. Ross DW, Brecher G, Bessis M (1981) Automation in hematology. What to measure and why? Monograph edition of the international Journal Blood Cells, Vol 6:2. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  260. Rotzler A, Völkert E, Ludewigs M (1980) Ärztliche und technische Leistungen im medizinischen Laboratorium. Einflüsse auf Laborwerte. Lab med 4 (A+B): 117

    Google Scholar 

  261. Rubin E (1982) Methods in laboratory investigation. A new editorial section. Lab Invest 47: 409 (E)

    Google Scholar 

  262. Rubin M, Barnett RN, Bayse D, Beutler E, Brown SS, Logan JE, Reimer CB, Westgard JO, Wilding P. Provisional recommendation on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part 1: Recommendations for specifications on labelling of clinical laboratory materials. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:893 (1977); Clin Chem 25: 1499 (1979)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  263. Part 2: Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical chemistry kits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 17:622, Clin Chem 25: 1503

    Google Scholar 

  264. Revised recommendation on evaluation of diagnostic kits.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Ruttkowski RB, Barnhart ER, Alexander LR (1980) Clinical enzymology, laboratory methods in enzymology. Instruments and reagents in clinical enzyme analysis. U.S. Department of Health and Human Service Public Health Service. CDS Atlanta p 19

    Google Scholar 

  266. Ruzicka J, Hansen E (1980) Flow injection analysis. Anal Chim Acta 114: 19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  267. Sappenfield RW, Beeler MF, Catrou PG, Boudreau DA (1981) Nine-cell diagnostic decision matrix — a model of the diagnostic process; a framework for evaluating diagnostic protocols. Am J Clin Pathol 75: 769

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  268. Schall RF, Tenoso HJ (1981) Alternatives to radioimmunoassay: Labels and methods. Clin Chem 27: 1157

    Google Scholar 

  269. Schwartz BD (1982) Automating the microscope. Technology 1982: 2

    Google Scholar 

  270. Schwartz MK (1983) Immunological enzyme assay: an overview. Clin Biochem 16: 4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  271. Schwick HG (1968) Immunological methods in clinical chemistry. 6th Int Congr Clin Chem. Karger, Vol 1: 93

    Google Scholar 

  272. Seligson D (1969) Observations regarding laboratory instrumentation and screening analysis. In: Benson ES, Strandjord PE (eds): Multiple laboratory screening. Academic Press, New York, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  273. Sevier ED, David GS, Martinis J, Desmond WJ, Bartholomew RM, Wang R (1981) Monoclonal antibodies in clinical immunology. Clin Chem 27:1797 Review

    Google Scholar 

  274. Shaikh AH (1979) A systematic procedure for selection of automated instruments in the clinical laboratory. Am J Med Technol 45: 710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  275. Siegel SR (1982) Instrumentation. Using the proposed NCCLS protocol for evaluation of automated instruments. Am J Med Technol 48: 595

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  276. Siest G, Dawkins SJ (1984) IFCC Expert panel on drug effects in clinical chemistry; Drug effects in clinical chemistry; Part 1: The basic concepts. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 22: 271

    Google Scholar 

  277. Skendzel LP, Batsakis JG, Lawson NS, Werner M, Manseau JE, Moore TD (1978) Proposed classification of clinical laboratory methods. Am J Clin Pathol 70: 584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  278. Slavin W (1982) Atomic absorption spectroscopy: The present and future. Anal Chem 54: 685A

    Google Scholar 

  279. Smith DS, Shenkin A, Dryburgh FJ, Morgan HG (1982) Emergency biochemistry services — are they abused? Ann Clin Biochem 19: 325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  280. Smith RG, Sestili MA (1980) Methods for ligand-receptor assays in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 26: 543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  281. Snyder LR, Karger BL, Giese RW (1978) Clinical liquid chromatography. In: Hercules DM, Hieftje GM, Snyder LR, Evenson MA (eds) Contemporary topics in analytical and clinical chemistry. Plenum Press, New York, p 199

    Google Scholar 

  282. Sonntag O, Haeckel R (1981) Erprobung und Bewertung von Geräten in der Laboratoriumsmedizin. Lab med 5: 169

    Google Scholar 

  283. Spill E (1977) Viele Krankenhausapparate sind lebensgefährlich. TV Hören und Sehen 45: 19

    Google Scholar 

  284. SPRI Projekt 3089 (1979) Evaluation of medical technology.

    Google Scholar 

  285. Staber G, Busch EW, Koller PU (1982) Systematische Prüfung von Pharmakaeinflüssen auf neu entwickelte Testkits. Med Lab (Stuttg) 5: 10

    Google Scholar 

  286. Stamm D (1973) Spezifität von Analysenmethoden. In: Lang H, Rick W, Roka L (eds) Optimierung der Diagnostik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York p 187

    Google Scholar 

  287. Stamm D (1974) Calibration and quality control materials. Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 12: 137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  288. Stamm D (1979) Reference materials and reference methods in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 17: 283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  289. Stamm D (1982) A new concept for quality control of clinical laboratory investigation in the light of clinical requirements and based upon reference method values. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20: 817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  290. Stanley R (1984) Automation in analytic chemistry. J Autom Chem 6: 6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  291. Stevens JF (1980) Accuracy and linearity of spectrophotometers in clinical chemistry laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem 17: 87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  292. Stewart PA (1983) Modern quantity acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 61: 1444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  293. Szabo A, Ors E (1983) Enzymes used in clinical chemical analysis. A review of clinical chemical enzymic methods. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21: 209

    Google Scholar 

  294. Szatkowski P (1979) The coefficient of analysis. Clin Chem 25: 1085

    Google Scholar 

  295. Tauscher W (1983) Lasertechnologie in der Methodik der Partikelgrössenuntersuchung. GIT Lab med 6: 394

    Google Scholar 

  296. Taylor DW, Baird HW (1977) A design for evaluation and justification of laboratory instruments. Am J Med Technol 43: 139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  297. Thefeld W (1978) Ärztliche und technische Leistung im medizinischen Laboratorium. II. Ein- oder Mehrkanalgeräte? Lab med 2 (A+B): 63

    Google Scholar 

  298. Thiers RE, Wu GT, Reed AH, Oliver LK (1976) Sample stability: a suggested definition and method of determination. Clin Chem 22: 176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  299. Tietz NW (1979) A model for a comprehensive measurement system in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 25: 833

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  300. Tietz NW, Batsakis J, Bayse D (1977) Guidelines for photometric instrumentation for measuring enzyme reaction rates. (A special report by the Instrumentation Guidelines Study Group, Subcommittee on Enzymes, Committee on Standards, AACC ). Clin Chem 23: 2160

    Google Scholar 

  301. Tremblay MM (1979) The evaluation of instruments in biochemistry. Canad J Med Technol 41: 65

    Google Scholar 

  302. Tydemann J, Morrison JI, Hardwick DF, Cassify PA (1982) The cost of quality control procedures in the clinical laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 77: 528

    Google Scholar 

  303. Uldall A, Dybkaer R (1976) Nomenclature of reagents. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 34: 305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  304. Uriano GA, Gravatt CC (1977) The role of reference materials and reference methods in chemical analysis. Crit Rev in: Anal Chem 6: 361

    Google Scholar 

  305. Van Assendelft OW, Zijlstra WG, Van Kampen EJ (1970) Haemoglobinometry. Challenges and pitfalls. Proc Kon Ned Akad Wet Ser C 73: 104

    Google Scholar 

  306. Van Loon JC (1981) Atomic fluorescence spectrometry: Present status and future prospects. Anal chem 53: 332A

    Google Scholar 

  307. Verbruggen R (1975) Quantitative immunoelectrophoretic methods: a literature survey. Clin Chem 21: 5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  308. Vinazzer H (1981) Möglichkeiten der Automation im Gerinnungslabor. Med Lab (Stuttg) 34: 55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  309. Voller A, Bartlett A, Bidwell D (eds) (1981) Immunoassays for the 80s MTP, Lancaster, UK

    Google Scholar 

  310. Vorus J (1982) Computer technology: a reality in today’s laboratory. Med Technol 48: 567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  311. Werner M (1977) Ein dreischichtiges Modell zur Bewertung der Wirksamkeit von Analysen und Befunden. Med Welt 28: 1254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  312. Werner M, Brooks SH, Wette R (1973) Strategy for cost-effective laboratory testing. Hum Pathol 4: 17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  313. Werner M, Altshuler CH (1979) Utility of multiphasic biochemical screening and systematic laboratory investigations. Clin Chem 25: 509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  314. Wertz RK, Triplett D (1980) A review of platelet counting performance in the united states. Am J Clin Pathol 74 (Suppl): 575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  315. Westgard JO, Hunt M (1973) Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method comparison studies. Clin Chem 19: 49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  316. Westgard JO, Carey RN, Wold S (1974) Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation. Clin Chem 20: 825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  317. Westgard JO, de Vos DJ, Hunt MR, Quam EF, Carey RN, Garber CC (1978) Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. Part I. Background and approach. Am J Med Technol 44: 290

    Google Scholar 

  318. Westgard JO (1981) Precision and accuracy: Concepts and assessment by method evaluation testing. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 13: 283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  319. Whicher JT (1978) The value of complement assays in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 24: 7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  320. Whitehead TP, Kricka LJ, Carter TJN, Thorpe GHG (1979) Analytical Luminescence: its potential in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 25: 1531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  321. Whitlow KJ, Campbell DJ (1983) Assessment of technologist workload as a factor in quality of laboratory performance. Am J Clin Pathol 79: 609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  322. Wiedecke L (1980) Grundsätze einer Neufassung des Eichgesetzes für den Bereich der Heilkunde. PTB Mitt 90: 28

    Google Scholar 

  323. Worth HGJ (1980) Relative costing of analytical systems. J Autom Chem 2: 125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  324. Wu GT, Twomey SL, Thiers RE (1975) Statistical evaluation of method-comparison data. Clin Chem 21: 315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  325. Yamamoto Y (1981) Automation and systemization of medical technology. Medical Review (Toshiba) 5: 17 (in Japanese with english abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  326. Young DS, Panek E (1976) Effects of drugs on the analytical procedures of a multitest analyzer. In: Siest G, Young DS (eds) Drug interference and drug measurement in clinical chemistry. Karger, Basel, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  327. Zimmermann N (1980) Gerätesicherheitsgesetz. Vorschriften für medizinisch-technische Geräte. medizintechnik 100: 118

    Google Scholar 

  328. Zuk RF, Rowley GL, Ullman EF (1979) Fluorescence protection immunoassay: a new homogeneous technique. Clin Chem 25: 1554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  329. Zweig MH, Robertson EA (1982) Why we need better test evaluations. Clin Chem 28: 1272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brinkmannstr. 21, 4000, Düsseldorf 1, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Richard Merten

  2. Zentrallabor-Nord, Lynarstr. 12, 1000, Berlin 20, Germany

    Dr. Karl-Georg von Boroviczény

  3. Institut für Labormedizin, Zentralkrankenhaus, St. Jürgenstraße, 2800, Bremen 1, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Rainer Haeckel

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Richard Merten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Karl-Georg von Boroviczény
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. Rainer Haeckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Brinkmannstr. 21, 4000, Düsseldorf 1, Germany

    Richard Merten

  2. Zentrallabor-Nord, Lynarstr. 12, 1000, Berlin 20, Germany

    Karl-Georg von Boroviczény

  3. Institut für Labormedizin, Zentralkrankenhaus, St. Jürgenstraße, 2800, Bremen 1, Germany

    Rainer Haeckel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merten, R., von Boroviczény, KG., Haeckel, R. (1985). Anforderungen an Analysen, Methoden, Reagenzien, Evaluationstechniken und -Systeme, Kostenanalysen, Kontroll- und Standardisierungsmaßnahmen; Instandhaltung, Kosten, Empfehlungen, Verordnungen, Richtlinien, Gesetze. In: Merten, R., von Boroviczény, KG., Haeckel, R. (eds) Methoden-, Reagenzien- und Geräte-Evaluation in der Laboratoriumsmedizin. INSTAND-Schriftenreihe, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69798-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69798-2_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69799-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69798-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation