Skip to main content

Hepatic Mass Lesions

  • Conference paper
Radiology Today

Part of the book series: Radiology Today ((RADIOL.TODAY,volume 3))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Since the introduction of roentgen rays, the identification of hepatic mass lesions have been one of the great challenges to diagnostic imaging. For many years, the diagnosis was based on the presence of calcification and/or displacement of the contrast-filled stomach, duodenum, and colonic hepatic flexure. Attempts to visualize the liver directly by introducing contrast media, such as Thorotrast, ended in failure. Later, this was followed by equally unsuccessful attempts at visualization by means of the intravenous injection of emulsified lipids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson P, Adams D, McNeil B, Sanders R, Siegelman S, Finberg H, Hessel S, Abrams H (1983) Computed tomography, ultrasound and scintigraphy of the liver in patients with colon or breast carcinoma: a prospective comparison. Radiology 149: 225–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Stark D et al. (1984) He-patic tumors: magnetic resonance and CT appearance. Radiology 150: 141–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle F, Pennock J, Banks L et al. (1982) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: initial experience. AJR 138: 193–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Knopf D, Torres W, Fajman W, Sones P (1982) Liver lesions: comparative accuracy of scintigraphy and computed tomography. AJR 138: 623–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Federle M, Filly R, Moss A (1981) Cystic hepatic neoplasms: complementary roles of CT and sonography. AJR 136: 345–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gore K, Callen P, Filly R (1982) Displaced retroperitoneal fat: sonographic guide to right upper quadrant mass localization. Radiology 142: 701–705.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berland K (1984) Screening for diffuse and focal liver disease: the case for hepatic computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 12: 83–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berland L, Lawson T, Foley W et al. (1982) A comparison of pre- and post-contrast CT in hepatic masses. AJR 138: 853–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foley W, Berland L, Lawson T, Smith T, Thorson M (1983) Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning. Radiology 147: 797–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy S, Moss A (1984) The use of a flow rate injector for contrast enhanced computed tomography. Radiology 151: 800

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Margulis, A.R., McCarthy, S. (1985). Hepatic Mass Lesions. In: Donner, M.W., Heuck, F.H.W. (eds) Radiology Today. Radiology Today, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69737-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69737-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69739-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69737-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics