Radiation Dosimetry Using the Methods of Flow Cytogenetics

  • Daryll K. Green
  • Judith A. Fantes
  • George Spowart

Summary

The measurement of whole body radiation dose by manually counting the proportion of damaged chromosomes in a sample of cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes requires many hours of skilled technician time. A low dose of approximately 15 rads could only be measured with certainty after 500 metaphase cells had been scored and one technician would spread this task over a period of 2–3 days. Flow cytogenetics offers an alternative scoring technique which is potentially more than an order of magnitude faster and which does not involve technician fatigue. We have studied the effects of in vitro radiation doses ranging from 25–400 rads on human peripheral blood lymphocytes by measuring the distortion of the Hoechst 33258 fluorescence distribution of human chromosomes in flow. The level of low intensity background signals, which increases with increasing radiation dose, correlates numerically with the radiation dose administered and the amount of chromosome damage scored by manual means. A human chromosome centromeric staining technique has been investigated which could lead to a method of recognising dicentric chromosomes in flow and a further enhancement to the radiation dose sensitivity of flow cytogenetics.

Keywords

Fatigue Vortex Glycerol Argon Penicillin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Evans HJ, Buckton KE, Hamilton GE and Carothers A (1979) Radiation Induced Chromosome Aberrations in Nuclear Dockyard Workers. Nature. 277:531–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evans HJ and Lloyd DC (1978) Mutation Induced Chromosome Damage in Man. (Eds. Evans HJ and Lloyd DC) University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  3. Fantes Judith A, Green DK, Elder JK, Mallow Patricia and Evans HJ (1983) Detecting Radiation Damage to Human Chromosomes by Flow Cytometry Mutation Res. Letters: 119:161–168Google Scholar
  4. Gray JW, Langlois RG, Carrano AV, Burkhart-Schulte K and Van-Dilla MA (1979) High Resolution Chromosome Analysis: One and Two Parameter Flow Cytometry. Chromosoma 73:9–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray JW, Peters D, Merrill JT, Martin R and Van Dilla MA (1979) Slit-scan Flow Cytometry of Mammalian Chromosomes. J. Histochem. Cytochem 27:441–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green DK and Fantes Judith A (1983) Improved Accuracy of In-Flow Chromosome Fluorescence Measurements by Digital Processing of Multi-parameter Flow Data. Signal Proc: 5:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lloyd DC, Purrott RJ and Reeder EJ (1980) The Incidence of Unstable Chromosome Abberrations in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes from Unirradiated and Occupationally Exposed People. Mutation Res 72:523–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moroi Y, Peebles C, Fritzler MJ, Steigerwald J and Tan EM (1980) Autoantibody to Centromere (Kinetochore) in Scleraderma Sera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 77:1627–1631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Otto FI and Oldiges H (1980) Flow Cytogenetic Studies in Chromosomes and whole Cells for the Detection of Clastogenic Effects. Cytometry 1:13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sillars R and Young BD(1981)A New Method for the Preparation of Metaphase Chromosomes for Flow Analysis. J ffistochem. Cytochem 29:74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wheelis LL, Hardy JA and Balasubramanian N (1975) Slit-scan Flow System for Automated Cyto-pathology. Acta. Cytol 19:45–52Google Scholar
  12. Young BD, Ferguson-Smith MA, Sillars R and Boyd E (1981) High Resolution Analysis of Human Peripheral Lymphocyte Chromosomes by Flow Cytometry. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 78:7727–7731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daryll K. Green
    • 1
  • Judith A. Fantes
    • 1
  • George Spowart
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Clinical and Population Cytogenetics UnitWestern General HospitalEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations