Skip to main content

Assessment of Environmental Insults on Lymphoid Cells as Detected by Computer Assisted Morphometric Techniques

  • Conference paper
Biological Dosimetry

Abstract

Analysis of the texture and distribution of chromatin in cell nuclei has resulted in the recognition and differentiation of: (i) different types of normal cells, (ii) cells in different stages of the cell cycle, (iii) neoplastic cells in various stages of differentiation, and (iv) cells altered by irradiation, chemicals and biological treatment [1–14]. The differentiation may be made by an analysis of chromatin stained in stoechiometric process with the Schiff stain using the Feulgen procedure. The information resides in the condensation, granularity and general spatial arrangement of the stained chromatin [15–16]. Small, gradual changes in the organization of the chromatin reflect changes in the normal physiology, maturity and differentiation of the cells [15–18].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Olson GB, Anderson RE, Bartels PH (1974) Differentiation of murine thoracic duct lymphocytes into T and B subpopulations by computer cell scanning techniques. Cell Immunol 13: 347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olson GB, Bartels PH (1979) Characterization of murine T and B cells by computerized micro-photometric analysis. Cell Biophysics 1:229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Olson GB, Donovan RM, Bartels PH, Pressman NJ, Frost JK (1980) Microphotometric differentiation of human T and B cells tagged with monospecific immunoadsorbent beads. Anal Quant Cytology 2:144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dormer P, Abmayr W (1979) Correlation between nuclear morphology and rate of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in a normal cell line. J Histochem and Cytochem 27:188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray JW (1974) Cell cycle analysis from computer synthesis of DNA histograms. J Histochem and Cytochem 22:642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicoloni C, Kendall F, Giaretti W (1977) Objective identification of cell cycle phases and sub-phases by automated image analysis. Biophysical J 19:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abmayr W, Giaretti W, Gais P, Dormer P (1982) Discrimination of Gl, S and G2 cells using high resolution TV scanning and multivariate analysis methods. Cytometry 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wied GF, Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Chen M, Reale FR, Schreiber H, Sychra JJ (1979) Discriminant analysis on cells from developing squamous cancer of the respiratory tract. Cell Biophysics 1:39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sychia JJ, Bartels PH, Bibbo M, Taylor J, Wied GL (1977) Computer recognition of abnormal ectocervical cells. Comparison of efficacy of contour and textural features. Acta Cytol 21:765

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koss LG, Bartels PH, Sychra JJ, Wied GL (1978) Computer discriminant analysis of atypical urothelial cells. Acta Cytol 22:382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson RE, Olson GB, Howarth GL, Wied GL, Bartels PH (1975) Computer analysis of defined populations of lymphocytes mediated in vitro. Amer J Pathology 80:21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olson GB, Anderson RE, Bartels PH (1979) Computer analysis of defined populations of lymphocytes irradiated in vitro. Human Path 10:179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Olson GB, Bartels PH (1981) Computer discrimination of splenocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes from mice infected with Friend murino leukemia virus. Pattern Recogn 13:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nair KE, Bartels PH, Mahon DC, Olson GB, Oloffs PC (1980) Image analysis of hepatocyte nuclei from chlordane treated rats. Anal and Quant Cytology 2:285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartels PH, Wied GL (1977) Computer analysis and biomedical interpretation of microscopic images: Current problems and future directions. Proceedings of the IEEE 6:252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson RE, Olson GB, Bartels PH (1982) Computer assisted quantification of injury to cells and tissues. In: Topics of Environmental Pathology, Vol 2, Published by VAREP

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sandritter W, Kiefer G, Schluter G, Moore W (1967) Eine cytophotometrische methode zur objektiorirang der morphologue von Zellkerulon. Histochemie 10:341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DeCampos Vidal B, Schluter G, Moore GW (1973) Cell nucleus pattern recognition: Influence of staining. Acta Cytol 17:510

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson RE, Olson GB, Autry JA, Howarth GL, Troup GM, Bartels PH (1977) Radio sensitivity of T and B lymphocytes. IV Effect of whole body irradiation upon various lymphoid tissues and numbers of recirculating lymphocytes. J Immunol 118:1191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olson GB, Anderson RE, Bartels PH (1982) Computer assisted morphometric analysis of radiation injury in murine lymphocytes. Acta Cytol 4:181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fusenig NE, Amer SM, Boukamp P, Lueder M, Wost P (1977) Methods for studying neoplastic transformation of epidermal cells in culture by chemical carcinogens. In: Methods for carcinogenesis tests at the cellular level and their evaluation for the assessment of occupational cancer hazards. By Fondazione С. Erba, pp 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ray VA (1981) Comparison of mutagenesis and in vitro transformation models in detecting potential carcinogens. In: Sugimura T, Kondo S, Takebe H (eds) Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens Alan R. Liss, Inc., pp 197–208

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/Mammalian Microsome Mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31:347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McCann J, Ames BN (1976) Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella Microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thilly WG, Deluca JG (1979) Human lymphoblasts: Versatile indicator cells for many forms of chemically induced genetic damage. In: Scheutzle D (ed) Monitoring Toxic Substances, pp 13–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Shack R, Baker R, Buchroeder R, Hillman D, Shoemaker R, Bartels PH (1979) Ultrafast laser scanner microscope. J Histochem Cytochem 27:153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Olson, G.B., Bartels, P.H. (1984). Assessment of Environmental Insults on Lymphoid Cells as Detected by Computer Assisted Morphometric Techniques. In: Eisert, W.G., Mendelsohn, M.L. (eds) Biological Dosimetry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69334-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69334-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-12790-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69334-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics