Skip to main content

A Comparison of Mechanical Nonlinearities in the Cochleae of Man and Gerbil from Ear Canal Measurements

  • Conference paper
Book cover HEARING — Physiological Bases and Psychophysics

Abstract

With the increasing certainty that cochlear mechanics is the determining factor in auditory sensitivity and frequency selectivity, we need to develop our understanding of the evoked biomechanical responses of the cochlea just as we have come to understand and use its electrophysiological responses. Here we compare and contrast ear canal manifestations of cochlear biomechanics in human and gerbil, and consider some parallels with the round window potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S.D. and Kemp, D.T. (1979) The evoked cochlear mechanical response in laboratory primates. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 224, 47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D.T. (1979). Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 224, 37–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D.T. (1982) Cochlear echoes-implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: New perspectives in noise-induced hearing loss. (D. Henderson et al., eds). pp 189–207. Raven Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D.T. and Chum, R. (1980) Observations on the generator mechanism of stimulus frequency acoustic emissions-two-tone suppression. In: Psychophysicals physiological and behavioural studies in hearing. Kemp, D.T. and Chum, R. eds). pp 34–41. Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.O. (1980) Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hearing Res. 2, 297–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.P. (1980) The combination tone, 2fl-f2, in psychophysics and ear canal recording. In: Psychophysicals physiological and behavioural studies in hearing. Wilson, J.P, eds). pp 43–73. Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedt, R.D. and Adams, G.D. (1981) Stimulated Acoustic emissions in the ear canal of gerbil. Hearing Res. 5, 295–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, EI and Manley, G. (1981) Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs. Hearing Res. 4, 43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1938 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kemp, D.T., Brown, A.M. (1938). A Comparison of Mechanical Nonlinearities in the Cochleae of Man and Gerbil from Ear Canal Measurements. In: Klinke, R., Hartmann, R. (eds) HEARING — Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69257-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69257-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69259-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69257-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics