The Use of Structured Design Methodology to Improve Realism in National Economic Planning

  • M. S. Elzas
Conference paper


In this paper a study is described that is meant to lead to a novel framework for nationwide economic planning. The framework is expected to extend the time horizon and broaden the angle of view of the plan and furthermore - through participatory satisficing - promote commitment to the resulting collective action and diminish prevailing free-riding attitudes. System-analysis, modelling and optimization play an important role in the framework. Perceived realism of the resulting tools is of key importance in the acceptance of the framework, therefore special attention is given to the nature of models, and the possibility to calibrate and validate them. No modelling formalism preference emerges, but a general methodological principle appears to be applicable in the realm of reorganisation (or rather re-engineering) of comprehensive socio-technical systems: the use of meta-models of social roles and social-hierarchies to allow a layered (structured) break-down of the socio-technical processes (both in the spatial and temporal sense) in order to map the reorganised system on the original one.

This ambitious research project has been initiated by the SAMUEL NEAMAN INSTITUTE for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, located in HAIFA, Israel.


Negotiation Process Alternative Policy Economic Planning Global Plan Negotiate Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    B.P. Zeigler: “What is modelling and simulation methodology?” In: Methodology in Systems Modelling and Simulation? B.P. Zeigler, M.S. Elzas, G.J. Klir, T.I. Oren ( Eds. ), North-Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T.I. Oren: “Concepts for advanced computer assisted modelling.” In: loc. cit. ref. l.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Einstein: “Gedanken ueber die oekonomischen Welt”. In: Mein Weltbild, Verlag das Goldene Vlies, 1955.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    M.S. Elzas: “Models and National Negotiating procedures.” The Samuel Neaman Institute, Haifa, Israel, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Wiener: “Collective action in Income Policy Domain.” The Samuel Neaman Institute, Haifa, Israel, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Wiener: “Logical Mai typing in Income Policy Formation and its Correction.” The Samuel Neaman Institute, Haifa/Israel,1980.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M.S. Elzas: “Simulation and the processes of change.” In: Simulation with discrete models? T.I. Oren, C.M. Shub, P.R. Roth (Eds.), IEEE TH0079-4, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Vies: “India’s economic development since independence.” Third year honours essay, Man Environment 390. University of Waterloo, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Elzas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations