The Future of Numerical Methods in Plant Systematics: A Personal Prospect
The divergent views of cladists and pheneticists have been a recurrent theme of this meeting. For this reason and also because my contribution on the first day was a phenetic “position paper”, it seems appropriate to try to look at the future role of numerical phenetics and numerical cladistics in plant systematics.
KeywordsCladistic Analysis High Taxon Character Selection Basic Taxon Phenetic Relationship
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cracraft, J. 1983. The significance of phylogenetic classifications for systematic and evolutionary biology. In this volume.Google Scholar
- McNeill, J. 1979. The application of iterative character-weighting in numerical taxonomy. Bot. Soc. Amer. Misc. Ser. 157: 63 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
- Pickersgill, B., C.B. Heiser and J. McNeill 1979. Numerical taxonomic studies on variation and domestication in some species of Capsicum. Pages 679–700 in J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding(eds.), The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. (Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 7 ). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Sinnott, Q. 1983. A proposed synthesis of cladistics and phenetics. Taxon (in press).Google Scholar
- Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Wiley, New York, 439 pp.Google Scholar