Abstract
Phylogenetic analysis may be described as the attempt to discover nested monophyletic groups. ‘Monophyly’ here is used in the sense of Hennig (1966) and is equivalent to Ashlock’s (1971) ‘holophyletic’ group. The characterization of such a group is clear; it is distinguished by a set of non-convergent derived character states (synapomorphies). A group that is not monophyletic may be further characterized by the use of two other terms, ‘paraphyly’ and ‘polyphyly’. However, these terms have been applied to a range of different concepts, with the result that a confusing array of different definitions exists for each (see Holmes 1980 for a recent review). Certainly clarification of these definitions is important as the terms are used by both ‘cladists’ and evolutionary taxonomists and are useful in the evaluation of these different approaches to classification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashlock, P.D. 1971.Monophyly and associated terms. Syst Zool. 20: 63–69.
Ashlock, P.D. 1979. An evolutionary systematist’s view of classi fication. Syst.Zool. 28: 441–450.
Farris, J.S. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst.Zool. 23: 548–554.
Fitch, W.M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406–416.
Hennig, W. 1966. Phytogenetic Systematics. Univ. Illinois Press. Urbana. 263 p.
Holmes, E. B. 1980. Reconsideration of some systematic concepts and terms. Evolutionary Theory 5 (1): 35–87.
Mayr, E. 1981. Biological classification: Toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies. Science 214: 510–516.
Platnick, N.I. 1977. Paraphyletic and polyphyletic groups. Syst. Zool. 26: 195–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faith, D.P. (1983). Parsimony and Paraphyly. In: Felsenstein, J. (eds) Numerical Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69026-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69024-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive