Advertisement

The Pharmacological Effect of Contrast Media on Renal Circulation Measured by Means of Angiodensitometry

  • H. K. Deininger
Conference paper

Abstract

The angiodensitometric studies in the patients we examined were done using conventional contrast media. They have long been used successfully in renal and vascular diagnosis. They are based on triiodinated salts of organic acids which dissociate in watery solutions (Boijsen et al. 1971; Coel and Lasser 1971; Deininger and Franzen, to be published; Grainger 1980, 1981; Hilal 1966).

Keywords

Contrast Medium Renal Artery Front Speed Renal Circulation Intraarterial Injection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almén T, Trägardh B (1973) Effects of non-ionic contrast media on the blood flow through the femoral artery of the dog. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 335:197Google Scholar
  2. Aperia A, Broberger O, Ekengren K (1968) Renal hemodynamics during selective renal angiography. Invest Radiol 3:389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspelin P (1978) Effects of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on morphology of human erythrocytes. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 19:675Google Scholar
  4. Aspelin P (1979) Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on red cell deformibility in vitro. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 20:1Google Scholar
  5. Boijsen E, Dahm J, Hallböök T (1971) Hemodynamic effect of contrast media in arteriography of legs. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 11:295Google Scholar
  6. Burgener FA, Fischer HW, Weber DA (1975) Nierendurchblutung nach selektiver Injektion von verschiedenen Dosen Diatrizoat in die Nierenarterie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 123:331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldicott WJH, Hollenberg NK, Abrams HL (1970) Characteristic of response of renal vascular bed to contrast media. Evidence for vasoconstriction induced by renin-angiotensin system. Invest Radiol 5:539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coel NM, Lasser EC (1971) A pharmacologic basis for peripheral vascular resistance changes. Am J Roentgenol 111: 802Google Scholar
  9. Dean RE, Andrew JH, Read RC (1964) The red cell factor in renal damage from angiographic media. JAMA 187:27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deininger HK (1974) Die Angiocinedensitometrie der Nieren. Habilitationsschrift, University of TübingenGoogle Scholar
  11. Deininger HK, Heuck F, Vanselow K (1971) Die Gewebsdensitometrie. Congr sec soc radiol Europe, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Deininger HK, Franzen G (1983) Klinische Bedeutung niehtionischer Kontrastmittel bei der Arteriographie. Ergebnisse einer Doppelblindstudie. Radiologe 23: (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Gonsette RE (1978) Animal experiments and clinical experience in cerebral angiography with a new contrast agent with a low hyperosmolality. Ann Radiol 21:271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grainger RG (1972) Renal toxicity of radiological contrast media. Br Med Bull 28:191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grainger RG (1980) The osmolality of contrast media. Br J Radiol 53:739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grainger RG (1981) Formulation and clinical introduction of low osmolality contrast media. Radiologe 21:261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilal SK (1966) Hemodynamic changes associated with the intraarterial injection of contrast media. Radiology 86:615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoferichter J, Leutschaft R, StacheG, HoferichterS (1968) Die Auswirkungen wiederholter intraaortaler Kontrastmittelinjektionen auf die Nierendurchblutung. Thoraxchirurgie 16:14Google Scholar
  19. Jepson RP, Simeone FA (1953) The actions of intraarterial Diodrast, Thorotrast and sodium iodide on the peripheral pulse volume of the lower extremity. Surgery 33:256Google Scholar
  20. Kloster FE, Bristow JD, Porter GA, Judkins MP, Griswold HE (1967) Comparative hemodynamic effects of equiosmolar injections of angiographic contrast materials. Invest Radiol 2:353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter GA, Kloster FE, Bristow JD (1969) Citedin RG Grainger (1972) Circulation 40 Suppl 111Google Scholar
  22. Raininko R (1979) Endothelial permability increase produced by angiographic contrast media. Fortschr Röntgenstr 113:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sako Y (1963) Hemodynamic changes during arteriography. JAMA 183:253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw RS (1956) Vascular responses to intra-arterial Diodrast and Urokon during arteriography. Surgery 39:385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherwood T, Lavender JP (1969) Does renal blood flow rise or fall in response to Diatrizoate? Invest Radiol 4Google Scholar
  26. Talner LB, Davidson AJ (1968) Renal hemodynamics effects of contrast media. Invest Radiol 3:310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. K. Deininger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMunicipal Hospital, and Teaching Hospital of the J. W. Goethe University Frankfurt/M.DarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations