Advertisement

Anatomische und funktionelle Grundlagen für die Wahl von Nahtmitteln und Nahttechniken in der Koronarchirurgie

  • W. Konertz
  • I. Yükseltan
  • A. Bernhard
Conference paper

Zusammenfassung

Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen standen 1980 mit 50,3% an erster Stelle der Todesursachen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Mehr als 1/3 dieser Sterbefälle (ungefähr 130 000) waren eine direkte Folge der koronaren Herzkrankheit [3].

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Berger RL, Davis KB, Kaiser GC et al. (1981) Preservation of the myocardium during coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation [Suppl II] 74:61–66Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooley DA (1979) Revascularisation of the ischémie myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78:301–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1981) Todesursachen 1980. DMW 106:1015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eschenbruch PM, Pabst F, Tollenaere P et al. (1981) The significance of coronary topography for operative technique and tactics in multiple myocardial revascularisation with jump-grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 29:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Favaloro RG (1968) The venous vein graft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion. Ann Thorac Surg 5:334–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green GE (1979) Technique of internal mammary-coronary artery anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78:455–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hacker RW, Thorka M, Emde J van der (1981) Life expectancy after coronary artery bypass surgery. I Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 29:212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson WD (1979) Diffuse coronary artery disease — Is it a contraindication for surgery? In: Rosskamm H, Schmutziger M (eds) Coronary heart surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy JW, Kaiser GC, Fisher LD et al. (1981) Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study of coronary artery surgery (CASS). Circulation 63:793–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kouchoukos NT, Obermann A, Kirklin JW et al. (1980) Coronary bypass surgery: Analysis of effective hospital mortality. Circulation (Suppl I) 62:84–89Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurusz M, Christman EW, Derrick JR et al. (1981) Use of cold cardioplegic solution for vein graft distension and preservation: A light and scanning electron microscopic study. Ann Thorac Surg 30:68–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loop FD (1979) Technique for performance of internal mammary artery — coronary artery anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78:460–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller DW, Ivey TD, Baily WW et al. (1981) The practice of coronary artery bypass surgery in 1980. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81:423–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ochsner JL, Jones JW, Notes NL (1979) The internal mammary artery as a coronary artery bypass graft. In: Rosskamm H, Schmutziger M (eds) Coronary heart surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stiles Q (1979) Technique of saphenous vein aorta coronary bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78:305–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ullyot DJ (1980) Current controversis in the conduct of the coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 30:192–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walter P, Flamming W, Schwarz F, Hehrlein FW (1979) Intraoperative estimation of technical and functional causes of limited aorto-coronary bypass flow. In: Rosskamm H, Schmutziger M (eds) Coronary heart surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Konertz
  • I. Yükseltan
  • A. Bernhard
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung Cardiovasculäre Chirurgie der Universität KielKiel 1Deutschland

Personalised recommendations