The Significance of the Size and Shape of Corneocytes

  • R. Marks
  • S. P. Barton
Conference paper

Abstract

In the past half century we have learned about most of what the stratum corneum does but very little about how it does it. We can document its various functions but are mostly silent when questioned as to which structural components are responsible for these functions. Corneocytes differ quite markedly from the keratinocytes that produce them. The most obvious difference is the disc-like shape of the corneocyte, allowing it to present a large surface area in the horizontal dimension. It seems reasonable to suggest that this difference in shape and surface area has important functional implications in the SC. This paper sets out to examine these and also to discuss those factors known to influence the size and shape of corneocytes.

Keywords

Permeability Corticosteroid Shrinkage Psoriasis Dermatitis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker H, Blair CP (1967) Cell replacement in the human stratum corneum in old age. Br J Dermatol 80: 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dawber RPR, Marks R, Swift JA (1972) Scanning electron microscopy of the stratum corneum. Br J Dermatol 86: 272–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldschmidt H (1979) Surface area measurements of psoriatic corneocytes: Effects of intra- lesional therapy. J Invest Dermatol 73: 558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffiths WAD, Marks R (1973) The significance of surface changes in parakeratotic horn. J Invest Dermatol 61: 251–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grove GL (1979) Exfoliative cytological procedures as a non-intrusive method for dermal gerontological studies. J Invest Dermatol 73: 67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hölzle E, Plewig G (1977) Effects of dermatitis, stripping and steroids on the morphology of corneocytes: A new bio-assay. J Invest Dermatol 68: 350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    King CS, Nicholls S, Barton SP, Marks R (1979) Is the stratum corneum of uninvolved psoriatic skin abnormal? Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl] (Stockh) 59: 95–100Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackenzie IC (1975) Ordered structure of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 65/1: 45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackenzie IC, Zimmerman K, Peterson L (1981) The pattern of cellular organisation of human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 76/6: 459–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marks R (1972) Histochemical application of skin surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 86: 20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marks R (1981) Measurement of biological ageing in human epidermis. Br J Dermatol 104: 627–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marks R, Barton SP (1980) The increase in epidermal cell size during differentiation: Measurement and significance. (Abstr) J Invest Dermatol 74/16: 449Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marks R, Finlay AY, Holt PJA (1981) Severe disorders of keratinization: Effects of treatment with Tigason (etretinate) Br J Dermatol 104: 667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mishima Y (1971) Scanning electron microscopy of psoriatic human epidermis. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) 51: 16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nicholls S, Marks R (1977) Novel techniques for the estimation of intracorneal cohesion in vivo. Br J Dermatol 96: 595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nilsson G, Sedin G, Oberg A (1975) A transducer for measurement of evaporation from the skin. International Conference on Biomedical Transducers. Paris. November, 1975 B 5.3 p71–76Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orfanos C, Christenhusz R, Mahrle G (1969) Die normale und psoriatische Hautoberflache. Vergleichende Beobachtungen mit dem Elektronenmikroskop. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol 235: 284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Plewig G, Marples RR (1970) Regional differences of cell sizes in the human stratum corneum. Part I. J Invest Dermatol 54/1: 13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts D, Marks R (1980) The determination of regional and age variations in the rate of desquamation: A comparison of four techniques. J Invest Dermatol 74/1: 13–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Squier CA, Hopps RM (1976) A study of the permeability barrier in epidermis and oral epithelium using horse radish peroxidase as a tracer in vitro. Br J Dermatol 95: 123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yardley HJ, Goldstein DJ (1976) Changes in dry weight and projected area of human epidermal cells undergoing keratinization as determined by scanning interference microscopy. Br J Dermatol 95: 621–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Marks
    • 1
  • S. P. Barton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineWelsh National School of MedicineCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations