Choice of Radiologic Contrast Medium: The Medico-legal Point of View

  • D. Fierro
  • M. Canale
Conference paper

Abstract

The radiologist’s responsibility in the case of contrast medium adverse reaction may be also a problem of correct choice. This seems especially true when comparing new non-ionic contrast media to ionic ones. Many factors may influence the criteria of choice, but basic principles must be related to the protection of patients.

Keywords

Toxicity Iodine Anemia Stake Iopamidol 

References

  1. 1.
    Almen T, Tragardh B (1973) Effects of non-ionic contrast media on the blood flow through the feloral artery of the dog. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 335:197–203Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caresano A (1980) Iopamiro in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Rays [Suppl] 6:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granger RG (1980) The osmolarity of intravascular contrast media. Br J Radiol 53:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammer B, Lackner W (1980) Iopamidol, a new nonionic hydrosoluble contrast medium for neuroradiology. Neuroradiology 19:119–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stake G, Borgnes J, Monn E (1979) Urography in children. A double blind study of metrizamide and metrizoate. Ann Radiol (Paris) 22:201–206Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Fierro
  • M. Canale

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations