Is There a Difference in Risk Factors in the Development of Angina Pectoris and Myocardial Infarction?

  • M. Kornitzer
Conference paper

Abstract

Angina pectoris is a subjective symptom with all the fallacies that implies for standardization. Thus various techniques have been used in order to “define” positive cases: most epidemiological studies have used a standardized questionnaire, whereas some have tried to confirm it through a clinical interview with or withour a stress ECG. In clinical series more sophisticated technique are used, like radionuclide investigations and, of course, coronary angiography.

Keywords

Cholesterol Depression Radionuclide Hyde Ergonovine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chapman JM, Coulson AH, Clark VA, Borun ER (1971) The differential effect of serum cholesterol, blood pressure and weight on the incidence of myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. J Chronic Dis 23:631–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 24:1350–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holme I, Helgeland A, Hjermann I, Leren P, Lund-Larsen PG (1980) Four and two-thirds years incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged men: The Oslo Study. Am J Epidemiol 112:149–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kornitzer M, Dramaix M, Gheyssens H (1979) Incidence of ischemic heart diseases in two Belgian cochorts followed during 10 yr. Eur J Cardiol 9/6:455–472Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pfaffenbarger RS Jr, Wing AL, Hyde RT (1978) Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni. Am J Epidemiol 108:161–175Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Framingham Study (1974) An epidemiological investigation of cardiovascular disease (Section 30): Some characteristics related to the incidence of cardiovascular disease and death: Framingham Study, 18-year follow-up. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, DHEW Publ. No(NIH) 74–599. Washington D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kornitzer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations