Interactions Between Plants

  • E. I. Newman
Part of the Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology book series (PLANT, volume 12 / C)


Relative Growth Rate Subterranean Clover Leaf Area Ratio Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus Trifolium Subterraneum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson DJ (1971) Pattern in desert perennials. J Ecol 59: 555–560Google Scholar
  2. Anderson MC (1964) Studies of the woodland light climate. I. The photographic computation of light conditions. J Ecol 52: 27–41Google Scholar
  3. Andrews RE, Newman EI (1970) Root density and competition for nutrients. Oecol Plant 5: 319–334Google Scholar
  4. Arya LM, Blake GR, Farrell DA (1975) A field study of water depletion patterns in presence of growing soybean roots. III. Rooting characteristics and root extraction of soil water. Soil Sei Soc Am Proc 39: 437–444Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin JP (1976) Competition for plant nutrients in soil; a theoretical approach. J Agric Sei 87: 341–356Google Scholar
  6. Bergh van den JP (1968) An analysis of yields of grasses in mixed and pure stands. Agric Res Rep 714, Cent Agric Publ Doc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  7. Black JN (1958) Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneumL.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate. Aust J Agric Res 9: 299–318Google Scholar
  8. Black JN (1960) The significance of petiole length, leaf area, and light interception in competition between strains of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneumL.) grown in swards. Aust J Agric Res 11: 277–291Google Scholar
  9. Black JN (1963) Defoliation as a factor in the growth of varieties of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneumL.) when grown in pure and mixed swards. Aust J Agric Res 14: 206–225Google Scholar
  10. Blackman GE, Rutter AJ (1946) Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. I. The light factor and the distribution of the bluebell (Scilla non-scripta) in woodland communities. Ann Bot (London) 10: 361–390Google Scholar
  11. Blackman GE, Templeman WG (1938) The interaction of light intensity and nitrogen supply in the growth and metabolism of grasses and clover (Trifolium repens). II. The influence of light intensity and nitrogen supply on the leaf production of frequently defoliated plants. Ann Bot (London) 2: 765–791Google Scholar
  12. Burdon JJ, Chilvers GA (1976) Epidemiology of Pythium-induced damping-off in mixed species seedling stands. Ann Appl Biol 82: 233–240Google Scholar
  13. Burdon JJ, Whitbread R (1979) Rates of increase of barley mildew in mixed stands of barley and wheat. J Appl Ecol 16: 253–258Google Scholar
  14. Caldwell MM (1976) Root extension and water absorption. In: Lange OL, Kappen L, Schulze ED (eds) Water and plant life. Ecol Stud. Analysis and synthesis, vol 19. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen NL, Muller CH (1975) Effects of fire on factors controlling plant growth in Adenostomachaparral. Ecol Monogr 45: 29–55Google Scholar
  16. Christie P, Newman EI, Campbell R (1978) The influence of neighbouring grassland plants on each others’ endomycorrhizas and root-surface microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 10: 521–527Google Scholar
  17. Cohen D (1969) The expected efficiency of light utilization in plant populations as affected by different selection and competition regimes. Isr J Bot 18: 171 — 174Google Scholar
  18. Cook SC A, Lefebvre C, McNeilly T (1972) Competition between metal tolerant and normal plant populations on normal soil. Evolution 26: 366–372Google Scholar
  19. Coombe DE (1966) The seasonal light climate and plant growth in a Cambridgeshire wood. In: Bainbridge R, Evans GC, Rackham O (eds) Light as an ecological factor. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies RI, Coulson CB, Lewis DA (1964) Polyphenols in plant, humus and soil. IV. Factors leading to increase in biosynthesis of polyphenol in leaves and their relationship to mull and mor formation. J Soil Sei 15: 310–318Google Scholar
  21. Dempster JP (1969) Some effects of weed control on the numbers of the small cabbage white (Pieris rapaeL.) on Brussels sprouts. J Appl Ecol 6: 339–345Google Scholar
  22. Donald CM (1958) The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust J Agric Res 9: 421–435Google Scholar
  23. Ellenberg H (1953) Physiologisches und ökologisches Verhalten derselben Pflanzenarten. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 65: 350–361Google Scholar
  24. England F (1968) Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. J Appl Ecol 5: 227–242Google Scholar
  25. Etherington JR (1967) Soil water and the growth of grasses. II. Effects of soil water potential on growth and photosynthesis of Alopecurus pratensis. J Ecol 55: 373–380Google Scholar
  26. Evans GC (1956) An area survey method of investigating the distribution of light intensity in woodlands, with particular reference to sunflecks. J Ecol 44: 391–428Google Scholar
  27. Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenner M (1978 a) A comparison of the abilities of colonizers and closed-turf species to establish from seed in artificial swards. J Ecol 66:953–963Google Scholar
  29. Fenner M (1978 b) Susceptibility to shade in seedlings of colonizing and closed-turf species. New Phytol 81:739–744Google Scholar
  30. Fonteyn PJ, Mahall BE (1978) Competition among desert perennials. Nature (London) 275: 544–545Google Scholar
  31. Ford ED (1975) Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. J Ecol 63: 311–333Google Scholar
  32. Free JB (1968) Dandelion as a competitor to fruit trees for bee visits. J Appl Ecol 5: 169–178Google Scholar
  33. Gibbs RD (1974) Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. McGill-Queen’s Univ Press, Montreal LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldsmith FB (1973) The vegetation of exposed sea cliffs at South Stack, Anglesey. II. Experimental studies. J Ecol 61: 819–829Google Scholar
  35. Grant EA, Sallans WG (1964) Influence of plant extracts on germination and growth of eight forage species. J Br Grassl Soc 19: 191–197Google Scholar
  36. Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature (London) 242: 344–347Google Scholar
  37. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am Nat 111: 1169–1194Google Scholar
  38. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  39. Grime JP, Jeffrey DW (1965) Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J Ecol 53: 621–642Google Scholar
  40. Gutiérrez JR, Fuentez ER (1979) Evidence for intraspeciflc competition in the Acacia caven( Leguminosae) savanna of Chile. Oecol Plant 14: 151–158Google Scholar
  41. Haider K, Martin JP (1975) Decomposition of specifically carbon-14 labeled benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39: 657–662Google Scholar
  42. Haider K, Martin JP, Rietz E (1977) Decomposition in soil of 14C-labeled coumaryl alcohols; free and linked into dehydropolymer and plant lignins and model humic acids. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 41: 556–562Google Scholar
  43. Harper JL (1961) Approaches to the study of plant competition. In: Mechanisms in biological competition. Soc Exp Biol Symp 15. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Harper JL (1967) A Darwinian approach to plant ecology. J Ecol 55: 247–270Google Scholar
  45. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Harper JL, Williams JT, Sagar GR (1965) The behaviour of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants from seed. J Ecol 53: 273–286Google Scholar
  47. Harris W (1972) Shading, defoliation, temperature, growth stage, and residual fertility effects on competition between Rumex acetosella, Trifolium repens, and Lolium(multi-florumx perenne). N Z J Agrie Res 15: 687–705Google Scholar
  48. Harris W, Lazenby A (1974) Competitive interaction of grasses with contrasting temperature responses and water stress tolerances. Aust J Agrie Res 25: 227–246Google Scholar
  49. Hatfield JL, Carlson RE (1978) Photosynthetically active radiation, C02 uptake, and stomatal diffusive resistance profiles within soybean canopies. Agron J 70: 592–596Google Scholar
  50. Heap AJ, Newman EI (1980) Links between roots by hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol 85: 169–171Google Scholar
  51. Hegnauer R (1962–1973) Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, vols I-VI. Birkháuser, Basel StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  52. Janzen DH (1972) Escape in space by Sterculia apetalaseeds from the bug Dysdercus fasciatusin a Costa Rican deciduous forest. Ecology 53: 350–361Google Scholar
  53. Jarvis PG (1964) The adaptability to light intensity of seedlings of Quercus petraea(Matt.) Liebl. J Ecol 52: 545–571Google Scholar
  54. Jones MM, Rawson HM (1979) Influence of rate of development of leaf water deficits upon photosynthesis, leaf conductance, water use efficiency, and osmotic potential in sorghum. Physiol Plant 45: 103–111Google Scholar
  55. Kellomaki S, Salminen R, Hari P, Ventila M, Kanninen M, Kauppi P, Smolander H (1979) A method for approximating the photosynthetie production of stand members inside the canopy. J Appl Ecol 16: 243–252Google Scholar
  56. Knapp R (1967) Experimented Soziologie und gegenseitige Beeinflussung der Pflanzen. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  57. Lawlor DW (1972) Growth and water use of Lolium perenne. I. Water transport. J Appl Ecol 9: 79–98Google Scholar
  58. Leach GJ, Watson DJ (1968) Photosynthesis in crop profiles, measured by phytometers. J Appl Ecol 5: 381–408Google Scholar
  59. Lemeur R, Blad BL (1974) A critical review of light models for estimating the shortwave radiation regime of plant canopies. Agric Meteorol 14: 255–286Google Scholar
  60. Leonard KJ (1969) Factors affecting rates of stem rust increase in mixed plantings of susceptible and resistant oat varieties. Phytopathology 59: 1845–1850Google Scholar
  61. Levin DA, Anderson WW (1970) Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. Am Nat 104: 455–467Google Scholar
  62. Litav M, Isti D (1974) Root competition between two strains of Spinacia oleracea. II. Effects of nutrient supply and of non-simultaneous emergence. J Appl Ecol 11: 1017–1025Google Scholar
  63. Martin JP, Haider K (1976) Decomposition of specifically carbon-14-labeled ferulic acid: free and linked into model humic acid-type polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 40: 377–380Google Scholar
  64. Maximov NA (1929) The plant in relation to water. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. May RM (1976) Theoretical ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  66. McGilchrist CA, Trenbath BR (1971) A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27: 659–671Google Scholar
  67. McNeilly T (1968) Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. III. Agrostis tenuison a small copper mine. Heredity 23: 99–108Google Scholar
  68. McPherson JK, Muller CH (1969) Allelopathic effects of Adenostoma fasciculatum“Chamise”, in the California chaparral. Ecol Monogr 39: 177–198Google Scholar
  69. McPherson JK, Chou C-H, Muller CH (1971) Allelopathic constituents of the chaparral shrub Adenostoma fasciculatum. Phytochemistry 10: 2925–2933Google Scholar
  70. Miles J (1972) Experimental establishment of seedlings on a southern English heath. J Ecol 60: 225–234Google Scholar
  71. Miles J (1974) Effects of experimental interference with stand structure on establishment of seedlings in Callunetum. J Ecol 62: 675–687Google Scholar
  72. Monteith JL (1965) Light distribution and photosynthesis in field crops. Ann Bot (London) 29: 17–37Google Scholar
  73. Monteith JL (1973) Principles of environmental physics. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Moral del R, Cates RG (1971) Allelopathic potential of the dominant vegetation of western Washington. Ecology 52: 1030–1037Google Scholar
  75. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods in vegetation ecology. Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Newbery DM, Newman EI (1978) Competition between grassland plants of different initial sizes. Oecologia 33: 361–380Google Scholar
  77. Newman EI (1978a) Allelopathy; adaptation or accident? In: Harborne JB (ed) Biochemical aspects of plant and animal coevolution. Academic Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Newman EI (1978b) Root microorganisms: their significance in the ecosystem. Biol Rev 53: 511–554Google Scholar
  79. Newman EI, Andrews RE (1973) Uptake of phosphorus and potassium in relation to root growth and root density. Plant Soil 38: 49–69Google Scholar
  80. Newman EI, Miller MH (1977) Allelopathy among some British grassland species. II. Influence of root exudates on phosphorus uptake. J Ecol 65: 399–411Google Scholar
  81. Newman EI, Campbell R, Rovira AD (1977) Experimental alteration of soil microbial populations for studying effects on higher plant interactions. New Phytol 79: 107–118Google Scholar
  82. Norman JM, Jarvis PG (1974) Photosynthesis in sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis(Bong.) Carr.] III. Measurements of canopy structure and interception of radiation. J Appl Ecol 11: 375–398Google Scholar
  83. Norman MJT (1960) The relationship between competition and defoliation in pasture. J Br Grassl Soc 15: 145–149Google Scholar
  84. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4: 25–51Google Scholar
  85. Nye PH, Tinker PB (1977) Solute movement in the soil-root system. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  86. O’Brien TA, Moorby J, Whittington WJ (1967) The effect of management and competition on the uptake of 32phosphorus by ryegrass, meadow fescue and their natural hybrid. J Appl Ecol 4: 513–520Google Scholar
  87. Okusanya OT (1979) An experimental investigation into the ecology of some maritime cliff species. IV. Cold sensitivity and competition studies. J Ecol 67: 591–600Google Scholar
  88. Orchard B (1967) Water deficit and the growth of crop seedlings. I. The effect of rate of change of soil water content on kale seedlings. J Exp Bot 18: 308–320Google Scholar
  89. Owusu-Bennoah E, Wild A (1979) Autoradiography of the depletion zone of phosphate around onion roots in the presence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. New Phytol 82: 133–140Google Scholar
  90. Passioura JB (1972) The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Aust J Agric Res 23: 745–752Google Scholar
  91. Pearce RB, Brown RH, Blaser RE (1967) Photosynthesis in plant communities as influenced by leaf angle. Crop Sci 7: 321–324Google Scholar
  92. Pielou EC (1960) A single mechanism to account for regular, random and aggregated populations. J Ecol 48: 575–584Google Scholar
  93. Putwain PD, Harper JL (1970) Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. III. The influence of associated species on populations of Rumex acetosaL. and R. acetosellaL. in grassland. J Ecol 58: 251–264Google Scholar
  94. Raper CD, Barber SA (1970) Rooting systems of soybeans. I. Differences in root morphology among varieties. Agron J 62: 581–584Google Scholar
  95. Rice EL (1974) Allelopathy. Academic Press, London New York Ritchie JT (1973) Influence of soil water status and meteorological conditions on evaporation from a corn canopy. Agron J 65: 893–897Google Scholar
  96. Rogers WS, Head GC (1969) Factors affecting the distribution and growth of roots of perennial woody species. In: Whittington, WJ (ed) Root growth. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  97. Rorison IH (1960) Some experimental aspects of the calcicole-calcifuge problem. I. The effects of competition and mineral nutrition upon seedling growth in the field. J Ecol 48: 585–599Google Scholar
  98. Ross MA, Harper JL (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J Ecol 60: 77–88Google Scholar
  99. Sagar GR, Harper JL (1961) Controlled interference with natural populations of Plantago lanceolata, P. majorand P. media. Weed Res 1: 163–176Google Scholar
  100. Sakai K-I (1961) Competitive ability in plants: its inheritance and some related problems. In: Mechanisms in biological competition. Soc Exp Biol Symp 15. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  101. Sandfaer J (1970) Barley stripe mosaic virus as the cause of sterility interaction between barley varieties. Hereditas 64: 150–152Google Scholar
  102. Sands K, Rutter AJ (1959) Studies in the growth of young plants of Pinus sylvestrisL. II. The relation of growth to soil moisture tension. Ann Bot 23: 269–284Google Scholar
  103. Sheehy JE, Chapas LC (1976) The measurement and distribution of irradiance in clear and overcast conditions in four temperate forage grass canopies. J Appl Ecol 13: 831–840Google Scholar
  104. Sheehy JE, Cooper JP (1973) Light interception, photosynthetic activity, and crop growth rate in canopies of six temperate forage grasses. J Appl Ecol 10: 239–250Google Scholar
  105. Singh JS, Gupta SR (1977) Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot Rev 43: 449–528Google Scholar
  106. Snaydon RW (1971) An analysis of competition between plants of Trifolium repensL. populations collected from contrasting soils. J Appl Ecol 8: 687–697Google Scholar
  107. Snaydon RW, Davies MS (1972) Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment. II. Morphological variation in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Evolution 26: 390–405Google Scholar
  108. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1974) Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J Ecol 62: 473–486Google Scholar
  109. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1977) A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). J Ecol 65: 427–430Google Scholar
  110. Stern WR, Donald CM (1962) Light relations in grass-clover swards. Aust J Agric Res 13: 599–614Google Scholar
  111. Suneson CA (1949) Survival of four barley varieties in a mixture. Agron J 41: 459–461Google Scholar
  112. Suneson CA, Wiebe GA (1942) Survival of barley and wheat varieties in mixtures. J Am Soc Agron 34: 1052–1056Google Scholar
  113. Szeicz G (1974) Solar radiation in crop canopies. J Appl Ecol 11: 1117–1156Google Scholar
  114. Tahvanainen JO, Root RB (1972) The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae( Coleoptera: Chrysome- lidae). Oecologia 10: 321–346Google Scholar
  115. Turkington R, Harper JL (1979) The growth, distribution and neighbour relationships of Trifolium repensin a permanent pasture. IV. Fine-scale biotic differentiation. J Ecol 67: 245–254Google Scholar
  116. Turkington R, Cahn MA, Vardy A, Harper JL (1979) The growth, distribution and neighbour relationships of Trifolium repensin a permanent pasture. III. The establishment and growth of Trifolium repensin natural and perturbed sites. J Ecol 67: 231–243Google Scholar
  117. Waite S, Hutchings MJ (1979) A comparative study of establishment of Plantago coronopusL. from seed sown randomly and in clumps. New Phytol 82: 575–583Google Scholar
  118. Warembourg FR, Paul EA (1977) Seasonal transfers of assimilated 14C in grassland: plant production and turnover, soil and plant respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 9: 295–301Google Scholar
  119. Warren Wilson J (1965) Stand structure and light penetration. I. Analysis by point quadrats. J Appl Ecol 2: 383–390Google Scholar
  120. Waser NM (1978 a) Interspecific pollen transport and competition between co-occurring plant species. Oecologia 36:223–236Google Scholar
  121. Waser NM (1978 b) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944Google Scholar
  122. Waser NM, Real LA (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature (London) 281: 670–672Google Scholar
  123. Watt AS (1926) Yew communities of the South Downs. J Ecol 14: 282–316Google Scholar
  124. Watt AS, Fraser GK (1933) Tree roots and the field layer. J Ecol 21: 404–414Google Scholar
  125. Webb LJ, Tracey JG, Haydock KP (1967) A factor toxic to seedlings of the same species associated with living roots of the non-gregarious subtropical rain forest tree Grevillea robusta. J Appl Ecol 4: 13–25Google Scholar
  126. Welbank PJ (1961) A study of the nitrogen and water factors in competition with Agropyron repens(L.) Beauv. Ann Bot (London) 25: 116–137Google Scholar
  127. Welbank PJ (1962) The effects of competition with Agropyron repensand of nitrogen- and water-supply on the nitrogen content of Impatiens parviflora. Ann Bot (London) 26: 361–373Google Scholar
  128. Welbank PJ (1964) Competition for nitrogen and potassium in Agropyron repens. Ann Bot (London) 28: 1–16Google Scholar
  129. White GC, Holloway RIC (1967) The influence of simazine or a straw mulch on the establishment of apple trees in grassed down or cultivated soil. J Hortic Sci 42: 377–389Google Scholar
  130. Wilson JB (1970) Nutritive and competitive relations between some upland grasses. Ph D thesis, Univ WalesGoogle Scholar
  131. Wit de CT (1960) On competition. Cent Landbouw Publ Landbouwdoc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  132. Wit de CT, Bergh van den JP (1965) Competition between herbage plants. Neth J Agric Sci 13: 212–221Google Scholar
  133. Yeaton RI, Cody ML (1976) Competition and spacing in plant communities: the northern Mohave Desert. J Ecol 64: 689–696Google Scholar
  134. Yeaton RI, Travis J, Gilinsky E (1977) Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. J Ecol 65: 587–595Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin·Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. I. Newman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations