Infection Rate of Continuous Monitoring of Ventricular Fluid Pressure with and Without Open Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage
The main advantage of continuous monitoring of ventricular fluid pressure (VFP), as compared to other methods of intracranial pressure (ICP) recording, is the possibility of performing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A great disadvantage, however, is the risk of intracranial infection. In clinical practice the infection rate of VFP measurements is of importance in order to evaluate the risk of VFP monitoring for each patient.
KeywordsContinuous Monitoring Ventricular Catheterisation Severe Brain Injury Suspect Infection Posterior Fossa Tumor
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Lundberg, N.: Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand. (Suppl.) 149, 1–193 (1960)Google Scholar
- 3.Sundbärg, G., Kjällquist, Å., Lundberg, N., Pontén, D.: Complications due to prolonged ventricular fluid pressure recording in clinical practice. In: Intracranial pressure. Brock, M., Dietz, H. (eds.), pp. 349–352. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar