Operative Results in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

  • C. Arienta
  • G. de Benedittis
  • L. Infuso
  • R. Villani
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Neurosurgery book series (NEURO, volume 8)

Abstract

Progressive myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis is a recognized clinical entity. For many years the accepted alternative to conservative treatment has been surgery. The standard cervical approach has been via the posterior route, performing decompressive laminectomy, foraminotomy or dentate attachments’ division in varying degree and combination. The anterior approach has been devised more recently as an alternative procedure whenever the pathologic condition in cervical spondylosis lies anterior to the spinal canal and in single-level lesions. Indications and limits of these two major surgical procedures have been extensively discussed in literature, whereas follow-up of patients operated upon have seldom been reported in detail (13, 7, 9, 1, 5, 11, 10, 6).

Keywords

Neurol Tate Dura Radiculopathy Spondylosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    BISHARA, S.M.: Posterior operation in treatment of cervical spondylosis with myelopathy: long-term follow-up study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. & Psychiat. 34, 393–398 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BREIG, A.: Biochemanics of the central nervous system. ALMQUIST and WIKSELL (eds.), pp. 1–183. Stockholm 1960Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CLOWARD, R.B.: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disc. J. Neurosurg. 15, 602–614 (1958)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CUSICK, J.F., ACKMANN, J.J., LARSON, S.J.: Mechanical and physiological effects of dentatotomy. J. Neurosurg. 46, 767–778 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    FAGER, C.A.: Results of adequate posterior decompression in the relief of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. J. Neurosurg. 38, 684–692 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    GREGORIUS, K., ESTRIN, T., CRANDALL, P.: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: long-term follow-up study. Arch. Neurol. 33, 618–625 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    GUIDETTI, B., FORTUNA, A.: Trattamento conservativo e chirurgico delle mielopatie da discoartrosi. Proceedings of the XXVI Italian Congress of Neurology, Rome Oct. 23–26, 1967, pp. 184–238. Roma: Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1967Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    HIRSCH, C., WICKBOM, I., LIDSTRÖM, A., et al.: Cervical disc resection: a follow-up of myelographic and surgical procedure. J. Bone Joint Surg. 46A, 1811–1821 (1964)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    JACOBS, B., KRUEGER, E.G., LEIVY, D.M.: Cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy. Results of anterior diskectomy and interbody fusion. J.A.M.A. 211, 2135–2139 (1970)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    JOMIN, M., BOUSQUET, C., DELANDSHEER, J.M., LAINE, E.: Traitement des complications radiculo-medullaires de la cervicoarthrose par la méthode de CLOWARD. Resultats à propos de 370 malades opérés. Neuro-chirurgie 21, 21–28 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    PHILLIPS, D.G.: Surgical results of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. & Psychiat. 36, 879–884 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ROBERTSON, J.T.: Anterior removal of cervical disc without fusion. Clin. Neurosurg. 20, 259–261 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    STOOP, W.L., KING, R.B.: Chronic myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis: its response to laminectomy and foraminotomy. J.A.M.A. 192, 281–284 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Arienta
  • G. de Benedittis
  • L. Infuso
  • R. Villani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations