Acute Care pp 128-132 | Cite as

Problem-Oriented Medical Record in Intensive Care

  • R. J. Rodrigues
Conference paper
Part of the Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine/Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin book series (A+I, volume 116)

Abstract

Expanding medical knowledge in the past decades and clinical innovations have created an information crisis of staggering proportions (6). Medical specialization and the accumulation of increased data from patients characterize modern medical practice; on the other hand, symptoms of this information crisis are inefficiency, lack of continuity of care, problems treated out of context, loss of patient data, inadequate evaluation of performance and inaccessible information (2–5,16,19, 20).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aronson, M.D.: The problem-oriented record. A two-column modification. JAMA 225, 716 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bjorn, J.C., Cross, H.D.: The Problem-Oriented Private Practice of Medicine. A System for Compheensive Health Care. Chicago: Modern Hospital Press 1970Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blake, T.M., Smith, D.L.: Words, work, system and medical records. South Med. J. 66, 971 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Editorial. Problem-oriented medical records. Lancet 1, 295 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Editorial. The challenge and the opportunities of the Weed system. Arch. Intern. Med. 128, 832 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feinstein, A.R.: Quality of data in the medical record. Comput. Biomed. Res. 3, 426 (1970)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feinstein, A.R.: The problems of the “Problem-oriented medical record”. Ann. Intern. Med. 78, 751 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldfinger, S.E.: The problem-oriented record: a critique from a believer. N. Engl. J. Med. 288, 606 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayakawa, S.I.: Language in Thought and Action. 3rd Edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovitch, Inc., 1972Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hurst, J.W.: Ten reasons why Lawrence Weed is right. N. Engl. J. Med. 284, 51 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hurst, J.W.: How to implement the Weed system. Arch. Intern. Med. 128, 456 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurst, J.W.: The art and science of presenting a patient’s problems. Arch. Intern. Med. 128, 463 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurst, J.W.: The problem-oriented record and the measurement of excellence. Arch. Intern. Med. 128, 818 (1971)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hurst, J.W.: More reasons why Weed is right. N. Engl. J. Med. 288, 629 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Redd, D.E.: Carpenter, R.R. and Rogers, K.D.: The Weed system and complete records. Arch. Intern. Med. 129, 834 (1972)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weed, L.L.: Medical records, patient care and medical education. Irish J. M. Sc. 6, 271 (1964)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weed, L.L.: New approach to medical teaching. Resident Physician 13, 11 (1967)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weed, L.L.: Medical records that guide and teach. I. N. Engl. J. Med. 278, 593 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weed, L.L.: Medical records that guide and teach. II. N. Engl. J. Med. 278, 652 (1968)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weed, L.L.: Medical Records, Medical Education and Patient Care. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc., 1970Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williamson, J.: Alexander, M. and Miller, G.: Continuing education and patient care research: physician response to screening test results. JAMA 201, 938 (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Rodrigues

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations