Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Neurosurgery ((NEURO,volume 2))

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

Meningiomas can be detected with greater certainty than other brain tumors by means of nearly all the radioisotopes currently used in tumor diagnosis. Evidently, their good detection is due to strong vascularization of meningiomas. Therefore, isotope compounds such J131-albumin (RIHSA) and Tc99m, which stay in the blood stream over a period of time, offer especially favourable conditions for detecting meningiomas. Clinical experience however shows that equally satisfactory results,can be obtained with radioactive compounds, which remain only briefly in the blood stream and are quickly metabolized such as Hg compounds (Hgl and Hg), Bi206 and positron radiations As74, Cu64 and Ga68 (Fig. 1). A synopsis of ample statistical studies shows that most isotopes are able to detect over 90 % of the meningiomas with varying degrees of localization. The relatively poor results in using Hg197 and Cu64 are probably attributable to insufficient methods and equipment. We observed no essential difference in the diagnostic exactness of As74 and Cu64, taking into account the different impulse outputs due to another radiation quality. Compounds remaining in the blood stream for a long time are obliged to exclude activity originating from voluminous cerebral sinuses, so that small tumors and those next to a sinus may be overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Botterell, E. H., Lougheed, W. M., Morley, T. P., Tasker, R. R.: Use of radioactive arsenic (As74) in the diagnosis of supratentorial brain tumors. Canad. Med. Ass. J. 85, 1321–1328 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner, M., Pihkanen, T. A., Voutilainen, A.: Radioisotopic diag-nosis of brain tumors. Ann. Med. exp. Fenn. 42, 145–151 (1964).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkmann, C. A., Wegst, A. V., Kahn, E. A.: Brain scanning with Mercury-203 labelled neohydrin. J. Neurosurg. 19, 644–651 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucy, P. C., Ciric, I. S.: Value of radioactive brain scans in the diagnosis of brain tumors as compared with other methods. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 13, 113–132 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Budabin, M., Siegel, G. J.: The anatomical correlation of the abnormal RISHA brain scan. J. Nucl. Med. 7, 128–139 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Divitiis, E., Megna, G., Turchiaro, G.: Aspetto complementare della elettroencefalografia e della scintigrafia cerebrale nella diagnostica dei processi espansivi endocranici. Di Cline Terap. Vol. XLVI/22, 1–8 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dugger, G. S., Pepper, F. D.: The reliability of radioisotopec encephalography. Neurology 13, 1042–1053 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Eck, J. H. M., Woldring, M.G.: Scanning the brain with various radioisotopes. Europ. Neurol. 2, 1–12 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodrich, J. K., Tutor, F. T.: The isotope encephalogram in brain tumor diagnosis. J. Nucl. Med. 6, 5–1 – 548 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuba, J., Husak, V., Sevcik, M., Klaus, E.: Vergleich der Eigenschaften von 99m -Pertechnetat and 113mIn-EDTA in der Szintigraphie. Röfo.112, 806–813 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loken, M. K., Wigdahl, L. O., Gilson, J. M., Staab, E. V.: Mercury-197 and Mercury-203 chlormerodrin for evaluation of brain lesions using a rectilinear scanner and scintillation camera. J. Nucl. Med. 7, 209–218 (1966).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mundinger, F., Asai, A.: Ergebnisse der digitalen Gammaenzephalographie bei Hirntumoren; Vergleich von Wismut-206, Quecksilber-203-Neohydrin and Technetium-99 m. Arch. Psych. Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol. 210, 297–312 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ojemann, R. G., Aronow, S. A., Sweet, W. H.: Scanning with positron-emitting radioisotopes. Arch. Neurol. 10, 218–228 (1964).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Overton, M. C., Otte, W. K., Beentjes, L. B., Haynie, T. P.: A comparison of Mercury-197 and Mercury-203 chlormerodrin in clinical brain scanning. J. Nucl. Med. 6, 28–37 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Planiol, T.: Gamma-Encephalography after ten years of utilization in neurosurgery. Progr. Neurol. Surg. Vol. I, 93–147 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rasmussen, P., Buhl, J., Busch, H., Haase, J., Harmsen, A.: Brain scanning — cerebral scintigraphy. Act. Neurochir. 23, 103–119 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhoton, A. L., Eichling, J., Ter-Pogossian, M. M.: Comparative study of Mercury-197 chlormerodrin and Mercury-203 chlormerodrin for brain scanning. J. Nucl. Med. 7, 50–59 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, D. J., Basilie, J. X. R.: Clinical evaluation as a neurodiagnostic procedure. Geriatrics, Vol. 23, 91–97 (1968).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schenck, P., Klar, E., Piotrowski, W.: Der Nachweis von Hirntumoren mit konventioneller Scanner-Methodik and Szintillationskamera. Therapi ewoche 33, 1149–1115 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sklaroff, D., Polakoff, P. P., Lin, P. M., Charkes, N. D.: Cerebral scanning with radioactive chlormerodrin (neohydrin). Neurology, Vol. 13/1., 79–85 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sweet, W. H., Aronow, S., Brownell, G. L.: External localization of intracranial lesions with radioactive isotopes. Schweiz. med. Woch. 92, 1545–1550 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wende, S., Schule, A., Marx, P.: Die neuroradiologische Diagnostik der Meningiome. Radiologe 9, 26–31 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilcke, O.: Die Bedeutung der Szintigraphie im Rahmen der neuro-chirurgischen Tumordiagnostik. Act. Neurochir. 23, 285–295 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilcke, O., Frowein, R. A.: Meningiomas. In: Handbook of clinical Neurology.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zum Winkel, K., Piotrowski, W., Klar, E., Scheer, K. E.: Nachweis and Lokalisation von Hirntumoren mit Radioneohydrin. Act. Neurochir., Vol. XIV/ 1–2, 105–125 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Witcofski, R. L., Maynard, C. D., Roper, T. J.: A comparative analysis of the accuracy of the Technetium-99m pertechnetate brain scan: Followup of 1.000 patients. J. Nucl. Med. 8, 187–196 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamamoto, Y. L., Feindel, W., Zanelli, J.: Comparative study of radioactive Chlormerodrin (neohydrin) tagged with Mercury-197 and Mercury-203 for brain scanning. Neurology Vol. 14/9, 815–820 (1964).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeidler, U., Kottke, S.: Hirngeschwulstnachweis durch Szintigraphie. Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilk. 196, 63–84 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

W. Klug M. Brock M. Klinger O. Spoerri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilcke, O. (1975). Possibilities and Limitations of Scintigraphy on Meningiomas. In: Klug, W., Brock, M., Klinger, M., Spoerri, O. (eds) Meningiomas Diagnostic and Therapeutic Problems Multiple Sclerosis Misdiagnosis Forensic Problems in Neurosurgery. Advances in Neurosurgery, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66118-1_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66118-1_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-07237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-66118-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics