Advertisement

A Mathematical Model for the Analysis of Therapies

  • D. Revenstorff

Abstract

Checking of therapeutic efficacy may be carried out at several levels of sophistication. The most elementary check is to demonstrate significance of change. This can be done in a simple before-and-after design. Apart from the problem of spontaneous remission, even here some intricate statistical problems appear (cf. HARRIS, 1962). A more comprehensive picture of therapeutic effects is provided by repeated observations of a client’s behaviour as therapy continues. Data from this kind of extended design constitute a time series. Again significance tests for change are in order. Moreover, the time course itself can be analysed with respect to rate of change, turning points, asymptotes and other features of shape. To acquire some descriptive shorthand of the change, curve fitting may be applied. The whole time series then is summarized as an exponential decay, a logarithmic curve or a parabola. Very common is the use of polynomials, which fit virtually everything if a proper degree is taken. Besides description of the data, such curve fitting sometimes has significance for the formulation of a theory to explain the change, e.g. Hull’s exponential acquisition curve of habit strength. It is only in connection with a theory that the use of a fitted curve for prediction by extrapolation appears to be reasonable.

Keywords

Behaviour Control Cigarette Consumption Spontaneous Remission Early Behaviour Behaviour Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T.W., Goodman, L.A.: Statistical inference about Markov chains. Amer. math. Statist. 28, 89–114 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R.C., Bower, G.H., Crothers, E.J.: An Introduction to Mathematical Learning Theories. New York: Wiley 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Brengelmann, J.C.: The therapy of smoking. Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Behaviour Modification, Wexford, Ireland 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Brownsberger, C.N.: Clinical versus statistical assessment of psychotherapy. Behav. Sci. 16 421–428 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gabriel, K.R.: Ante-dependence analysis of an ordered set of variables Ann. math. Statist. 33, 201–212 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gottmann, J.M., MacFall, R.M., Barnett, J.T.: Design and analysis of research using time series. Psychol. Bull. 12, 299–346 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guttmann, L.: A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In: Lazarsfeld, P.E. ( Ed. ): Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences Free Press: 1954.Google Scholar
  8. Halperin, S., Lissitz, R.W.: Statistical properties of Markov chains: a computer program. Behav. Sci. 16, 244–247 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, C.B.: Problems in Measuring Change 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Hertel, R.K.: Application of stochastic process analyses to the study of psychotherapeutic processes. Psychol. Bull. 77, 421–430 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoel, P.G.: A test for Markov chains. Biometrica 41, 430–433 (1954).Google Scholar
  12. Kemeny, J.G., Snell, J.L.: Finite Markov Chains. Princeton, N.J.: van Nostrand 1960.Google Scholar
  13. Morrison, D.F.: Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York: McGraw Hill 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Rodda, B.E., Miller, M.C., Bruhn, J.B.: Prediction of anxiety and de¬pression patterns among coronary patients using a Markov process analysis. Behav. Sci. 16, 482–489 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Suppers, P., Atkinson, R.C.: Markov Learning Models for Multiperson Interactions. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Revenstorff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations