Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Auditory System pp 479–583Cite as

On the “Residue” and Auditory Pitch Perception

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Handbook of Sensory Physiology ((1534,volume 5 / 3))

Abstract

The present chapter on the residue phenomenon is set up in an unorthodox way. Instead of giving a cursory review it presents the historical development in great detail. It is more a textbook on the psychophysics of pitch than a review of recent research. There are several reasons for this, as listed below:

  1. a)

    Very few scientists, even those working on pitch perception, are aware of all the intricacies involved.

  2. b)

    Textbooks on psychophysics or physiology of hearing in general are either outdated — the development has been very fast the last five years — or not authorative on this subject.

  3. c)

    The older literature on the residue is inaccessible as a consequence, an overview is difficult to obtain.

  4. d)

    The publications include many subtleties in psychophysical experiments or advanced mathematical details of signal generation which make them difficult to understand for physiologists, etc.

  5. e)

    There exist many misconceptions about the relevance of certain physiological experiments for pitch perception (and vice versa).

  6. f)

    The problem of the residue is of prime importance for speech as well as for music, but a comprehensive account of the subject does not exist.

  7. g)

    In some instances psychophysical or physiological studies are reported that seem to indicate that the “residue” is about to be discovered again. Such situations may be prevented by the existence of a general text.

To J. F. Schotjten who “placed” his mark on a “period”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Békésy, G. von: Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill Co. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsen, F.A.: Repetition pitch: Monaural interaction of a sound with the repetition of the same, but phase shifted, sound. Acustica 17, 295–300 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsen, F.A., Goldstein, J. L.: Pitch of dichotically delayed noise and its possible spectral basis. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 55, 292–296 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsen, F.A., Ritsma, R. J.: Repetition pitch and its implication for hearing theory. Acustica 22, 63–73 (1969, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de : On the “residue” in hearing. Academic thesis, Amsterdam 1956a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de: Pitch of inharmonic signals. Nature (Lond.) 178, 535–536 (1956b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de: A note on phase distortion and hearing. Acustica 11, 182–184 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de: On the principle of specific coding. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control (Trans ASME) 95-G, 265–273 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de: Spectral transformations by essential nonlinearities. Internal memorandum Bell Telephone Laboratories (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, E. de, Bouwmeester, J.: Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology (Basel) 13, 236–259 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, G. van den: Experiments on binaural diplacusis and tone perception. In: Plomp, R., Smoorenburg, G. F. (Eds.): Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherlands: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, G. van den: The relation between binaural diplacusis for pure tones and for complex sounds under normal conditions and with induced monaural pitch shift. Acustica 32, 159–165 (1975a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, G. van den: Monaural frequency-pitch relations as the origin of binaural diplacusis for pure tones and residue sounds. Acustica 32, 166–174 (1975b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunen, T. J. F., Bilsen, F. A.: Subjective phase effects and combination tones. In: Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E. (Eds.): Facts and models in hearing. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunen, T.J.F., Festen, J.M., Bilsen, F.A., Brink, G. van den: Phase effects in a three-component signal. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 55, 297–303 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo, B.L.: Proceedings IPO conference on hearing theory. Eindhoven, Netherland: IPO 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, E.M., Huggins, W.H.: Creation of pitch through binaural interaction. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 30, 413–417 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, E.: See under B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, P.: Combination tone 2f 1-f 2 in microphonic potentials. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 46, 1437–1444 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duifhuis, H.: Audibility of high harmonics in a periodic pulse. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 48, 888–893 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duifhuis, H.: Audibility of high harmonics in a periodic pulse. II. Time effect. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 49, 1155–1162 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duifhuis, H.: Cochlear nonlinearity and second filter; possible mechanism and implications. Submitted for publication, J. acoust. Soc. Amer. (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlach, N.I.: Binaural signal detection: equalization and cancellation theory. In: Tobias, J.V. (Ed.): Foundations of modern auditory theory. New York-London: Academic Press 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E.F., Wilson, J.P.: The frequency selectivity of the cochlea. In: Moller, A. A. (Ed.): Basic mechanisms in hearing. New York-London: Academic Press 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, H.: Model of the “secondary” residue effect in the perception of complex tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 42, 759–764 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. L., Gitttman, N.: On the pitch of periodic pulses. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 32, 1308–1319 (1960a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. L., Guttman, N.: Pitch of periodic pulses without fundamental component. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 32, 1319–1328 (1960b).

    Google Scholar 

  • H.: The physical criterion for determining the pitch of a musical tone. Phys. Rev. 23, 427–437 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H.: Speech and Hearing. London: McMillan 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H.: Auditory patterns. Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 258–278 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H.: Speech and hearing in communication. New York: Van Nostrand 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcin, A.J.: The pitch of noise with periodic spectral peaks. In: Proceedings 5th International Congress on Acoustics, Liège, Vol. I a, B 52 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcin, A.J.: Central pitch and auditory lateralization. In: Plomp, R., Smoorenburg, G.F. (Eds.): Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherland: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.L.: Auditory spectral filtering and monaural phase perception. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 41, 458–479 (1967a).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.L.: Auditory nonlinearity. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 41, 676–689 (1967b).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J.L.: Aural combination tones. In: Plomp, R., Smoorenburg, G.F. (Eds.): Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherland: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.L.: An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 54, 1496–1516 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.L., Kiang, N.Y.-S.: Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1-f 2. Proc. IEEE 56, 981–992 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M.H.Jr.: Neurophysiological representation of complex auditory stimuli. MITRLE, Technical Report 323 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • N., Flanagan, J.L.: Pitch of high-pass-filtered pulse trains. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 36, 757–765 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.L.: Auditory distortion products f 2-f 1 and 2f 1-f 2. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 1863–1871 (1972a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.L.: Monaural phase effect: cancellation and reinforcement of distortion products f 2-f 1 and 2f 1-f 2. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 1872–1881 (1972b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. L.: Two-tone distortion products in a nonlinear model of the basilar membrane. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 56, 1818–1828 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helle, R.: Amplitude und Phase des im Gehör gebildeten Differenztones dritter Ordnung. Acustica 22, 74–87 (1969, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helle, R.: Selektivitätssteigerung in einem hydromechanischen Innenohrmodell mit Basilarund Deckmembran. Acustica 30, 301–312 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von: Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik. Braunschweig: Vieweg 1862. Fifth edition 1896. On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. First English edition 1897. Paperback edition. New York: Dover 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hind, J.E., Anderson, D. J., Brugge, J.F., Rose, J.E.: Coding of information pertaining to paired low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 794–816 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, G.A.: The missing fundamental. A place theory of frequency analysis in hearing. Academic thesis, Utrecht (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast, T.: Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 1885–1894 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast, T.: Psychophysical experiments on “tuning curves” and “two-tone inhibition”. Acustica 29, 168–179 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast, T.: Personal demonstrations (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtsma, A.J.M., Goldstein, J.L.: Perception of musical intervals: evidence for the central origin of the pitch of complex tones. MIT-RLE, Technical Report 484 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtsma, A.J.M., Goldstein, J.L.: The central origin of the pitch of complex tones: evidence from musical interval recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 51, 520–529 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiang, N.Y.-S., Watanabe, T., Thomas, E.D., Clark, L. F.: Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT-Press (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.O., Molnar, C.E., Pfeiffer, R.R.: A system of nonlinear differential equations modeling basilar-membrane motion. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 54, 1517–1529 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J.C.R.: A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia (Basel) 7/4, 128–134 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J.C.R.: “Periodicity pitch” and “place pitch”. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 26, 945 (A) (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Licklider, J.C.R.: Auditory frequency analysis. In: Proceedings Third London Symposium on Information Theory 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardozo, B.: See under C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, R.C., Miller, R.L.: Phase effects in monaural perception. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 19, 780–797 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, M.E., Small, A.M., Jr.: Pitch perception of pulse pairs with random repetition rate. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 41, 690–699 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Taylor, W.G.: The perception of repeated bursts of noise. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 20, 171–180 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, A.M.: Short-time spectrum and “cepstrum” techniques for vocal-pitch detection. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 36, 296–302 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmark, J.: Some analogies between pitch and lateralization phenomena. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 35, 1544–1547 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohm, G.S.: Über die Definition des Tones, nebst daran geknüpfter Theorie der Sirene und ähnlicher tonbildender Vorrichtungen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 59, 513–565 (1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohm, G.S.: Noch ein Paar Worte über die Definition des Tones. Ann. Phys. Chem. 62, 1–18 (1844).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R. D.: The effects of relative phase and number of components on residue pitch. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 53, 1565–1572 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, R.R., Kim, D.O.: Considerations of nonlinear response properties of single cochlear nerve fibers. In: Möller, A.A. (Ed.): Basic mechanisms in hearing. New York-London: Academic Press 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R.: The ear as a frequency analyzer. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 36, 1628–1636 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R.: Detectability threshold for combination tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 37, 1110–1123 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R.: Experiments on tone perception. Academic thesis, Utrecht (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R.: Beats of mistuned consonances. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 42, 462–474 (1967 a).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R.: Pitch of complex tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 41, 1526–1533 (1967b).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., Levelt, W.J.M.: Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 38, 548–560 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, R., Smoorenburg, G.F.: Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherland: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, W.S.: Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 49, 1218–1231 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritsma, R.J.: Existence region of the tonal residue. I. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 34, 1224–1229 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritsma, R.J.: On pitch discrimination of residue tones. Intern. Audiol. 2, 34–37 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritsma, R.J.: Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 42, 191–198 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsma, R.J., Hoekstra, A.: Frequency selectivity and the tonal residue. In: Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E. (Eds.): Facts and models in hearing. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J.E., Brugge, J.F., Anderson, D. J., Hind, J.E.: Some possible neural correlates of combination tones. J. Neurophysiol. 32, 402–423 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.E.: Personal communication (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A., Dallos, P.: Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold. Nature (Lond.) 253, 44–46 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, M.B., Kiang, N.Y.-S.: Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 43, 1120–1128 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.F.: The perception of subjective tones. Proceedings Kon. Acad. Wetensch. (Neth.) 41, 1086–1094 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotjten, J.F.: Synthetic sound. Philips Tech. Rev. 4, 153–180 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.F.: The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis. Proc. Kon. Acad. Wetensch. (Neth.) 43, 356–365 (1940a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.F.: The residue and the mechanism of hearing. Proc. Kon. Acad. Wetensch. (Neth.) 43, 991–999 (1940b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.F.: De toonhoogtegewaarwording. Philips Technisch Tijdschr. 5, 298–306 (1940c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.F., Ritsma, R.J., Cardozo, B.L.: Pitch of the residue. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 34, 1418–1424 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M.R.: “Period histogram and product spectrum”, new methods for fundamental-frequency measurement. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 43, 829–834 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M.R.: Relation between critical bands in hearing and the phase characteristic of cubic difference tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 46, 1488–1491 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M.R.: The amplitude behavior of the cubic difference tone. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 58, 728–732 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seebeck, A.: Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 53, 417–436 (1841).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebeck, A.: Ueber die Sirene. Ann. Phys. Chem. 60, 449–481 (1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W.M.: Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: place or periodicity mechanisms? Proc. IEEE 58, 723–730 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, A.M., Jr.: Some parameters influencing the pitch of amplitude modulated signals. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 751–760 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, A.M., Jr., McClellan, M.E.: Pitch associated with time delay between two pulse trains. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 35, 1246–1255 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoorenburg, G.F.: Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 48, 924–942 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smoorenburg, G.F.: Audibility region of combination tones. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 52, 603–614 (1972a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoorenburg, G.F.: Combination tones and their origin. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 52, 615–632 (1972b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C.R.: A possibility for sub-tectorial membrane fluid motion. In: Möller, A. A. (Ed.): Basic mechanisms in hearing. New York-London: Academic Press 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Über die durch amplitudenmodulierte Sinustöne hervorgerufene Hörempfindung. Acustica 20, 210–214 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in the sensations of roughness and periodicity pitch. In: Plomp, R., Smoorenburg, G.F. (Eds.): Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherland: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Zur Tonhöhenwahrnehmung von Klängen. I. Psychoakustische Grundlagen. Acustica 26, 173–186 (1972a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Zur Tonhöhenwahrnehmung von Klängen. IL Ein Funktionsschema. Acustica 26, 187–199 (1972b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 55, 1061–1069 (1974a).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terhardt, E.: On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness). Acustica 30, 201–213 (1974b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, W.R., Small, A.M., Jr.: Pitch perception for certain periodic auditory stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 132–137 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonndorf, J.: Localization of aural harmonics along the basilar membrane of guinea pigs. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 30, 938–943 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, G.: See under B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, K.: Zusammenwirken von Hüllkurvenperiode und Tonheit bei der Bildung der Periodentonhöhe. Academic thesis, Stuttgart 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, K.: Zusammenhänge zwischen dem Schallreiz und der Periodenhöhe. Acustica 21, 319–329 (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, K.: Über ein Funktionsschema für die Bildung der Periodentonhöhe aus dem Schallreiz. Kybernetik 6, 65–72 (1969b).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E.G.: Theory of hearing. New York: Wiley 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E.G., Lawrence, M.: Physiological acoustics. Princeton: University Press 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, I.C.: Central nervous processing in relation to spatio-temporal discrimination of auditory patterns. In: Plomp, R., Smoorenbtjrg, G.F. (Eds.): Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, Netherland: Sijthoff 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, F. L.: Pitch and stimulus fine structure. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 54, 397–406 (1973a).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, F. L.: The pattern-transformation model of pitch. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 54, 407–416 (1973b).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Der ungewöhnliche Amplitudengang der nichtlinearen Verzerrungen des Ohres. Acustica 5, 67–74 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Der kubische Differenzton und die Erregung des Gehörs. Acustica 20, 206–209 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E.: Ein hydromechanisches Ausschnittmodell des Innenohres zur Erforschung des adequaten Reizes der Sinneszellen. Acustica 30, 313–319 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E., Flottorp, G., Stevens, S.S.: Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 29, 548–557 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E.: Facts and models in hearing. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amsterdam, Netherlands

    E. de Boer

Authors
  1. E. de Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Physiologie und Biokybernetik der Universität 8520 Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 17, Germany

    Wolf D. Keidel

  2. I. Physiologisches Institut der Universität, Universitätsstraße 17, 8520, Erlangen, Germany

    Wolf D. Keidel

  3. Center for Neural Sciences and Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47401, USA

    William D. Neff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Boer, E. (1976). On the “Residue” and Auditory Pitch Perception. In: Keidel, W.D., Neff, W.D. (eds) Auditory System. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol 5 / 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66082-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66082-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-66084-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-66082-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation