Surgery of Megaureter

  • René Küss
  • Christian Chatelain
Part of the Handbuch der Urologie / Encyclopedia of Urology book series (HDBUROL, volume 13 / 3)

Abstract

Megaureter is not a clearly defined and limited pathologic concept. The term is used for all forms of congenital dilatation (Perrin) and in fact it covers a large number of diverse anatomic lesions although it is true that the physiopathologic consequences are very similar.

Keywords

Filtration Mercury Convolution Ileal Hydronephrosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, S., Van Dellen, T. R.: Congenital defects following maternal rubella. J. Amer. med. Ass. 140, 1210 (1949).Google Scholar
  2. Amato, A.: Contributo allo studio delle dilatazioni ureterali congenite. Urologia (Treviso) 17, 444–457(1950).Google Scholar
  3. Ambrosetti, A., Pagano, F., Ronini, G. M.: Contribution to the study of the behaviour of the nerve fibres in the congenital ureterectasis. Urol. int. (Basel) 22, 414–424 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. Andreassen, M.: Vesical neck obstruction in children. Acta chir scand. 105, 398 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreucci, V. E.: Mega-uretere congenito in un soggettoadulto. Studio anatomo-clinico. Riv. Anat. pat. 24, 781–794 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Archie, L., Dean, J., Jr., Lattimer, T. K., McCoy, C. B.: The standardized Columbia University cystogram. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 78, 662–668 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R.: Ureteral electromyography in congenital megalo-ureter. Amer. J. Dis. Child. 87, 7–15 (1954).Google Scholar
  8. Baker, R., Huffer, J.: Electromyography in normal, dilated, transected and transplanted ureter. Amer. J. Physiol. 174, 381–390 (1953a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker, R., Huffer, J.: Ureteral electromyography. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 70, 874–883 (1953b).Google Scholar
  10. Ballanger, R., Delorme, Q.: A propos de deux cas de méga-uretères primitifs. J. Méd. Bordeaux 135, 158 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Band, D.: Discussion on anomalies of the ureter in childhood. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 43, 281–290 (1950).Google Scholar
  12. Barden, I.: Congenital absence of abdominal muscles, with distended and hypertrophied urinary bladder. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 12, 331 (1901).Google Scholar
  13. Benjamin, J. A., Betheil, J. J., Emmel, V. M., Ramsey, G. H., Watson, J. S.: Observations on ureteral obstruction and contractility in man and dog. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 75, 25 (1956).Google Scholar
  14. Bernardino, R.: Contribuzione clinica alio studio del mega-uretere. Minerva Chir. 111, 560–563 (1948).Google Scholar
  15. Bischoff, P. F.: Mega-ureter. Brit. J. Urol. 29, 416–423 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bischoff, P. F.: Zur chirurgischen Behandlung des kindlichen Megaloureters. Urol. int. (Basel) 6, 12–49(1958).Google Scholar
  17. (1960).
    Bischoff, P. F.: Operative treatment of megaureter. Trans. Amer. Ass. gen.-urin. Surg. 52, 87– 93 .Google Scholar
  18. Bischoff, P. F.: Operative treatment of megaloureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 85, 268–274 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. Bischoff, P. F.: Betrachtungen zur Genese des Megaureters. Urol. 85, 268–274 (1961).Google Scholar
  20. Bischoff, P. F.: Betrachtungen zur Genese des Megaureters. Urol. int. (Basel) 11, 257–286 (1961).Google Scholar
  21. Bischoff, P. F.: Die Dauerergebnisse wiederherstellender Operationen bei angeborenen Entleerungsstörungen und Mißbildungen des Harnleiters. Xlle Cong. Soc. Int. Urol. Rio de Janeiro 1, 9–87 (1961).Google Scholar
  22. Bischoff, P. F.: Symptomatologie et traitement chirurgical du mégauretère congénital. Act. urol. belg. 30, 257–285(1962).Google Scholar
  23. Bischoff, P. F.: Chirurgie du méga-uretère. Encycl. Med. Chir. (Tech. Chir. Urol.) Paris, 41135.Google Scholar
  24. Bischoff, P. F., Borhncke, H., Lassrich, A.: I disturbi congeniti della minzione nella prima infancia. Schedario di peditria. 5, 35–52 (1965).Google Scholar
  25. Bischoff, P. F., Busch, H. G.: Origin, clinical experiences and treatment of urinary obstructions of the lower ureter in childhood. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 85, 739–748 (1961).Google Scholar
  26. Bischoff, P. F., Lassrich, A.: Pyeloskopische Beobachtungen am primären Megaureter vor und nach plastischen Operationen. Xle Cong. Soc. Int. Urol. Stockholm 2, 397–406 (1958).Google Scholar
  27. Bischoff, P. F., Strohmenger, P.: Betrachtungen zur Frage der operativen Behandlung des kongenitalen Megaureter beim Erwachsenen. Urologe 5, 218–221 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bodian, M.: Some observations on the pathology of congenital “idiopathic bladder-neck obstruction” (Marion’s disease). Brit. J. Urol. 29, 393–398 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Boeminghaus, H.: Megaureter (Betrachtungen zur Ätiologie und Therapie). Urol. Int. (Basel) 4, 257(1957).Google Scholar
  30. Boeve, H. J.: Sténoses intramurales terminales de l’uretère chez l’enfant. Arch, franc. Pédiat. 7, 714(1951).Google Scholar
  31. Bolzer, E.: Electrical stimulation and conduction of excitation in smooth muscle. Amer. J. Physiol. 122, 614 (1938).Google Scholar
  32. Boppe, M., Marcel, J. E.: Coexistence chez un enfant de huit ans d’une maladie du col vesical et de méga-uretère bilateral. Opérations multiples. Guérison fonctionnelle. Bull. Soc. Pédiat. 36, 36(1938).Google Scholar
  33. Bouchard, R.: La dilatation congénitale primitive des voies urinaires supérieures. Thèse Paris, 1926.Google Scholar
  34. Bourne, C. W., Cerny, J. C.: Congenital absence of abdominal muscles: report of 6 cases. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 98, 252–259 (1967).Google Scholar
  35. Boyarsky, S., Labay, P., Kirshner, N., Gerber, C.: Does the ureter have nervous control ? J. Urol. (Baltimore) 97, 627–632 (1967).Google Scholar
  36. Braasch, W. F.: Dilatation of ureter and renal pelvis. J. Amer. med. Ass. 73, 731 (1919).Google Scholar
  37. Broglio, R.: Mega-colon e mega-uretere congeniti. Rif. Med. 43, 23 (1927).Google Scholar
  38. Bruton, O. C: Agenesis of abdominal musculature associated with genito-urinary and gastrointestinal tract, anomalies. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 66, 606 (1951).Google Scholar
  39. Burns, E.: Congenital obstructive lesions at uretero-vesical junction. J. Amer. med. Ass. 146, 419 (1951).Google Scholar
  40. Burns, E., Harvard, B. M.: Common congenital lesions of urinary tract. J. Amer. med. Ass. 146, 419(1951).Google Scholar
  41. Campbell, E. W.: Megaloureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 60, 31 (1948).Google Scholar
  42. Campbell, M. F.: Congenital bilateral uretero-vesical junction stricture in infants and children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 26, 529–546 (1931).Google Scholar
  43. Campbell, M. F.: Vascular obstruction of ureter in juveniles. Amer. J. Surg. 22, 527–541 (1933).Google Scholar
  44. Campbell, M. F.: Vascular obstruction of ureter in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 36, 366–384 (1936).Google Scholar
  45. Campbell, M. F.: Pediatric urology. 1 vol. New York: Macmillan Co. 1937.Google Scholar
  46. Campbell, M. F.: The dilated ureter in children. Amer. J. Surg. 39, 438 (1938).Google Scholar
  47. Campbell, M. F.: Ureteral obstruction in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 41, 660 (1939).Google Scholar
  48. Campbell, M. F.: Congenital bladder neck obstructions. Sth. med. J. (Bgham, Ala.) 41, 99 (1948).Google Scholar
  49. Campbell, M. F.: Hydronephrosis in infants and children. Trans. Amer. Ass. Gen.-Urin. Sum. 42,185–198(1950).Google Scholar
  50. Campbell, M. F.: Primary megalo-ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 68, 584–590 (1952).Google Scholar
  51. Carlson, H. E.: The intrapsoas transplant of megalo-ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 72, 172 (1954).Google Scholar
  52. Carver, J.: The megalo-ureter (report of two cases). Brit. J. Surg. 36, 168–172 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Charnock, D. A.: Management of the dilated ureter. J. Amer. med. Ass. 157, 574–576 (1955).Google Scholar
  54. Chatterjee, S. K.: Giant mega-ureter. Brit. J. Urol. 36, 406–412 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chisholm, E., Hutch, J. A., Bolomey, A. A.: Ureteral obstruction due to chronic inflammation of the fascia around the ureters. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 72, 812–816 (1954).Google Scholar
  56. Cordonnier, J. J.: Obstructive uropathy and urinary tract infections in children. Postgrad. Med 23, 221 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Crabtree, E. G.: Plastic operative for the relief of megalo-ureter. Trans. Amer. Ass. gen.-urin Surg. 30, 311 (1937).Google Scholar
  58. Creevy, C. D.: The atonic distal ureteral segment (ureteral achalasia). J. Urol. (Baltimore) 97 457–463(1967).Google Scholar
  59. Cussen, L. J.: The structure of the normal ureter in infancy and childhood. Invest. Urol. 5, 164–178 (1967a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Cussen, L. J.: The structure of the normal human ureter in infancy and childhood. A quantitative study of the muscular and elastic tissue. Invest. Urol. 5, 179–194 (1967b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Daut, R. V., Emmett, J. L., Kennedy, R. L. J.: Congenital absence of abdominal muscles with urologie complications. Report of a patient successfully treated. Proc. Mayo Clin. 22, 8–13 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Debled, G.: La structure normale de l’uretère terminal. Acta urol. belg. 36, 119–128 (1968a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Debled, G.: L’étiologie du méga-uretère congénital primaire. Acta urol. belg. 36, 129–136 (1968b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Debled, G.: L’hiatus urétéral normal et pathologique. Acta urol. belg. 36, 357–365 (1968c).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Debled, G.: La fonction normale et pathologique de la musculature urétéro-trigonale. Acta urol. belg. 36, 366–382 (1968 d).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Debled, G.: La sténose congénitale de l’uretère terminal. Acta urol. belg. 38, 9–16 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Deuticke, P.: Zur Frage des primären Megaureters. Z. Urol. 55, 241–245 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Eagle, J. F., Jr., Barrett, G. S.: Congenital deficiency of abdominal musculature with associated genito-urinary abnormalities. A syndrome: report of nine cases. Pediatrics 6, 721–736 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Edelbrook, H. H.: Uretero-vesical obstruction in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 74, 492–497 (1955).Google Scholar
  70. Edwards, D.: Cineradiology in congenital bladder neck obstruction and mega-ureter. Brit. J. Urol. 29, 410–415(1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Eisenstaedt, J. S.: Primary congenital dilatation of ureters. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 15, 21–27 1926a).Google Scholar
  72. Eisenstaedt, J. S.: Primary congenital megalo-ureters. Arch. Surg. 13, 64–74 (1926b).Google Scholar
  73. Everidge, J.: Valvular obstruction of ureter. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 25, 1683 (1932).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Flocks, R. H.: Lower urinary tract obstruction in infants and children. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer. 2, 755 (1955).Google Scholar
  75. Fortescue Brickdale, J. M.: A note on congenital dilatation of the ureters. Bristol med.-chir. J. 23, 231 (1905).Google Scholar
  76. Gallizia, F., Vanzaghi, C: Megaureter idiopatico congenitale unilaterale in bambini. Urologia (Treviso) 18, 451 (1951).Google Scholar
  77. Gayet, R.: L’uretère intramural. J. Urol. 46, 193–217 (1937).Google Scholar
  78. Gayon, J.: Essai de classification des gros uretères congénitaux de l’enfant, leur exploration, leur traitement. Thèse Paris, 1960.Google Scholar
  79. Gerard, L.: La forme de l’uretère chez le foetus et le nouveau-né. Thèse Paris, n° 63, 1908.Google Scholar
  80. Gil Vernet, S.: Fisiologia délia minzione. I. Urologia (Treviso) 25, 561 (1958).Google Scholar
  81. Gil Vernet, S.: Fisiologia della minzione. IL Urologia (Treviso) 26, 5 (1959a).Google Scholar
  82. Gil Vernet, S.: Fisiologia della minzione. III. Urologia (Treviso) 26, 113 (1959b).Google Scholar
  83. Gloor, H. U.: Über die Ursachen der Mcgaloureterbildung. Schweiz, med. Wschr. 69, 1080 (1939).Google Scholar
  84. Grajewski, L. E.: Congenital hydro-ureter (megalo-ureter); report of a case. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 44,54–62(1940).Google Scholar
  85. Greene, L. F., Emmett, J. L., Culp, O. S., Kennedy, R. L. J.: Urologie abnormalities associated with congenital absence or deficiency of abdominal musculature. Trans. Amer. Ass. Gen.-Urin. Surg. 43, 120–132(1951).Google Scholar
  86. Greene, L. F., Priestley, J. T., Simon, H. B., Hempstead, R. H.: Obstruction of the lower third of the ureter by anomalous blood vessels. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 71, 544 (1954).Google Scholar
  87. Gregoir, W.: Traitement chirurgical du reflux congénital et du mégauretère primaire. Urol. int. (Basel) 24, 502–526 (1969).Google Scholar
  88. Gregoir, W., Debled, G.: La dysembryoplasie fibro-épithéliale de l’uretère intramural. Act. urol. belg. 34, 229–232 (1966).Google Scholar
  89. Gregoir, W., Debled, G.: L’étiologie du reflux congénital et du mégé-uretère primaire. Urol. int. (Basel) 24, 119–134(1969).Google Scholar
  90. Grevillius, A.: Über einen Fall von Megaloureter bilateralis eines 5jährigen Mädchens. Acta chir. scand. 85, 317 (1941).Google Scholar
  91. Grogler, F.: Über zwei Fälle von Megaloureter. Z. urol. Chir. 34, 55 (1932).Google Scholar
  92. Gruber, C. M.: Comparative study of the intravesical ureter in man and experimental animals. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 21, 567 (1929a).Google Scholar
  93. Gruber, C. M.: The uretero-vesical valve. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 22, 275–292 (1929b).Google Scholar
  94. Gruber, C. M.: The function of uretero-vesical valve and the experimental production of hydro-ureters without obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 23, 161–179 (1930).Google Scholar
  95. Gruber, C. M.: Autonomic innervation of the genito-urinary system. Physiol. Rev. 13, 497 (1933).Google Scholar
  96. Hanley, H. G.: The electro-ureterogram. Brit. J. Urol. 25, 358 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Hempler, A. B.: Non obstructive dilatations of upper urinary tract in children. J. Amer. med. Ass. 109, 1602 (1937).Google Scholar
  98. Hendren, W. H.: Ureteral reimplantation in children. J. pediat. Surg. 8, 649 (1968).Google Scholar
  99. Hendren, W. H.: Operative repair of mega-ureter in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 101,491 (1969).Google Scholar
  100. Hendren, W. H.: Functional restoration of decompensated ureters in children. Amer. J. Surg. 119, 477 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Hepburn, T. N.: Obstruction at the ureteral valve. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 36, 368–372 (1923).Google Scholar
  102. Heyman, W., Martin, J. F.: Bilateral megaloureter in a child: return to normal with control of infection. J. Pediat. 35, 618 (1949).Google Scholar
  103. Hinman, F.: Obstructive hydroureteral angularity with hydronephrosis in children. Arch. Surg. 18, 21 (1929).Google Scholar
  104. Hinman, F.: Principles and practice of urology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders 1935.Google Scholar
  105. Houdsen, L. G.: Congenital absence of the abdominal muscles. Arch. Dis. Childh. 9, 219–232 (1934).Google Scholar
  106. Hurts, A. F., Gaymer, J. J.: A case of megaloureter due to achalasia of the uretero-vesical sphincter. Brit. J. Urol. 3, 43 (1931).Google Scholar
  107. Hutch, J. A.: The treatment of hydronephrosis by sacral rhizotomy in paraplegics. J. Urol (Baltimore) 77, 123–134 (1937).Google Scholar
  108. Hutch, J. A.: Study of uretero-vesical junction in cases with complete ureteral atresia. J. Urol (Baltimore) 74, 795–803 (1955).Google Scholar
  109. Hutch, J. A.: Saccule formation of the uretero-vesical junction in smooth walled bladders J. Urol. (Baltimore) 86, 390–399 (1961a).Google Scholar
  110. Hutch, J. A.: Theory of the intravesical ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 86, 534–538 (1961 b).Google Scholar
  111. Hyams, J. A.: Aberrant blood vessels as a factor in lower ureteral obstruction: preliminary report. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 48, 474–479 (1929).Google Scholar
  112. Iannaccone, G.: Moderne vedute sul megauretere congnito. Nintius Radiol. 21, 577 (1955).Google Scholar
  113. Iannaccone, G., Marsella, A.: Le dilatazioni dell’uretere. Contributo e rassegna critica con particolare riguardo al problema del megauretere. Radiol, med. (Torino) 41, 759 (1955).Google Scholar
  114. Irwin, G. E., Kraus, J. E.: Congenital megaloureter and hydroureter: pathogenesis and classification. Arch. Path. 45, 752–756 (1948).Google Scholar
  115. Jewett, H. J.: Upper urinary tract obstructions in infants and children: diagnosis and treatment. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer. 2, 737–754 (1955).Google Scholar
  116. Johnston, J. H.: Reconstructive surgery of mega-ureter in childhood. Brit. J. Urol. 39, 17 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Kimbrough, I. C., Morgan, D. K., Fürst, I. N.: Neuromuscular dysfunction of urinary tract. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 60, 780 (1949).Google Scholar
  118. Kjellberg, S. R., Rudhe, U.: The foetal renal secretion and its significance in congenital deformities of the ureters and urethra. Acta radiol. (Stockh.) 31, 243 (1949).Google Scholar
  119. Lattimer, J. K.: Congenital deficiency of the abdominal musculature and associated genitourinary anomalies: a report of 22 cases. Trans. Amer. Ass. gen.-urin. Surg. 49, 28–37 (1957).Google Scholar
  120. Lauret, G.: Pyuries chroniques de l’enfance et malformations congénitales obstructives de l’uretère. Méd. Franc. (Paris) 10, 91 (1947).Google Scholar
  121. Lazarus, J. A., Ricci, M. W.: Idiopathic segmental ureteral megaureter ectasia. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 69, 222 (1953).Google Scholar
  122. Leibowitz, S., Bodian, M.: A study of the vesical ganglion in children and the relationship to the megaureter-megacystis syndrome and Hirschsprung’s disease. J. clin. Path. 16, 342–350 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Leibowitz, S., O’Donnell, M. B.: Cystometry in megaureter-megacystis syndrome. Brit. J. Urol. 29,399–402(1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Lepoutre, C: Dilatation de l’arbre urinaire et reflux vésico-urétéral d’origine congénitale J. Urol. méd. chir. 33, 560 (1932).Google Scholar
  125. Lewis, F. L., Cletsoway, R. W.: Megalo-ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 75, 643–649 (1956).Google Scholar
  126. Lewis, F. L., Kombrough, J. C: Megalo-ureter: new concept in treatment. Sth. med. J. (Bgham, Ala.) 45, 171 (1952).Google Scholar
  127. Lich, R., Jr., Howerton, L. W.: The uretero-vesical junction of the newborn. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 92, 436–438 (1964).Google Scholar
  128. Lucas, D. R.: On the abnormal peristaltic movements of the ureter. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. (N Y ) 4, 6(1906–1907).Google Scholar
  129. MacGovern, J. H., Marshall, V. F.: Congenital deficiency of the abdominal musculature and obstructive uropathy. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 108, 289–305 (1959).Google Scholar
  130. MacKay, H.: Congenital bilateral megalo-ureters with hydronephrosis; remarkable family history. Proc. roy. Soc. Med. 38, 567–568 (1945).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. MacMyn, D. J.: On dilatation of the ureters and hydronephrosis in childhood. Brit. J. Urol. 1, 150(1929).Google Scholar
  132. Marion, G.: Traité d’urologie. 4th ed. Paris: Masson et Cie 1941.Google Scholar
  133. McLaughlin, A. P., Leadbetter, W. F., Pfister, R. C: Reconstructive surgery of primary megaloureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 106, 186–193 (1971).Google Scholar
  134. Melick, W. F., Naryka, J. J.: Pressure studies of the normal and abnormal ureter in children by means of the strain gauge. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 83, 267–276 (1960).Google Scholar
  135. Miguel, S.: Etude anatomique de l’uretère terminal. Acta urol. belg. 26, 197–215 (1958).Google Scholar
  136. Mollard, P., Deasy, B., Mathon, C: Méga-uretères primitifs idiopathiques. Pathogénie et traitement. (91 malades, 113 uretères.) Ann. Urol. 6, 45–55 (1972).Google Scholar
  137. Monfort, G., Giraud, J. P., Unal, D., Carcassonne, M.: L’urétéroplastie modelante longitudinale. (Intervention de Hendren.) A propos de 22 observations. Ann. Chir. infant. 12, 221–224 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Montagnini, R., Mancia, A., Crisci, E.: Méga-uretère. Minerva chir. 22, 260–268 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Moonen, W. A.: A technique of recalibration of dilated ureters. Overgedrukt uit Archivium Chirurgicum Neerlandicum IX, fasc. 3 (1957).Google Scholar
  140. Murnaghan, G. F.: Experimental investigation of the dynamics of the normal and dilated ureter. Brit. J. Urol. 29, 403–409 (1957a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Murnaghan, G. F.: A method of recording the electrical activity of the isolated perfused ureter under controlled conditions. J. Physiol. 135, 32 (1957b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Murnaghan, G. F.: The physiology of mega ureter. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 51,776–779(1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Murnaghan, G. F.: The dynamics of the renal pelvis and ureter. J. Roy. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 4,157–159(1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Narath, P. A.: Renal pelvis and ureter. New York: Grune and Stratton Inc. 1951.Google Scholar
  145. Nesbit, R. M., Withycombe, J. F.: The problem of primary megalo-ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 72, 162–171 (1954).Google Scholar
  146. Neveu, J.: A propos des méga-uretères congénitaux (une technique d’anastomose urétéro-vésicale). Acta urol. belg. 31, 309–315 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Ockerblad, N. F.: Congenital dilatation of ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 13, 325–328 (1925).Google Scholar
  148. Ormond, J. K.: Megalo-ureter and related conditions in children; 6 cases. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 70, 171–179(1953).Google Scholar
  149. Ormond, J. K.: Megalo-ureter and related conditions in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 72, 162 (1954).Google Scholar
  150. Ormond, J. K.: Neuromuscular disorders of the urinary tract in children. Radiology 65, 352 (1955).Google Scholar
  151. Ormond, J. K., Osborne, R. W.: Plastic surgery of the ureter in children. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 67, 860(1952).Google Scholar
  152. Orr, L. M.: The consequences of surgical relief of uretero-vesical obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 63, 1043–1052 (1950).Google Scholar
  153. Paquin, A. J., Marshall, V. F., McGovern, J. W.: The megacystis syndrome. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 83, 634–646(1960).Google Scholar
  154. Patel, J. C: Traitement chirurgical des méga-uretères apéristaltiques. Presse méd. 74, 125 (1966).Google Scholar
  155. Perrin, J.: Traitement des méga-uretères. Rap. 54e Cong. Ass. franç. Urol. Paris 1960a.Google Scholar
  156. Perrin, J.: Les méga-uretères non obstructifs. Pédiatrie 15, 855–863 (1960b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Perrin, J.: Traitement des méga-uretères. J. Urol. Néphrol. 67, 105–121 (1961).Google Scholar
  158. Pieper, A.: Beitrag zur Nervenversorgung des Ureters. Z. Urol. 44, 17–23 (1951a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Pieper, A.: Neue Untersuchungsergebnisse über Ganglienzellen, sensible Nervenfasern und vegetative Geflechte in der Wandung des Ureters. Z. Urol. 44, 576–587 (1951 b);PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Pieper, A.: Neue Untersuchungsergebnisse über Ganglienzellen, sensible Nervenfasern und vegetative Geflechte in der Wandung des Ureters. Z. Urol. 45, 280 (1952);PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Pieper, A.: Neue Untersuchungsergebnisse über Ganglienzellen, sensible Nervenfasern und vegetative Geflechte in der Wandung des Ureters. Z. Urol. 46, 375 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Pisani, L.: La dilatazione ureterale. Ureterctasia e megalouretere. Bologna: L. Capelli 1929.Google Scholar
  163. Poole-Wilson, D.S.: Discussion on the chronically dilated ureter. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 45, 835 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Puhl, H.: Die primäre Dilatation des Harnleiters. Z. Urol. 28, 328 (1934).Google Scholar
  165. Quinby, W. C: Physiology and pathology of the ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 7, 259 (1922).Google Scholar
  166. Randall, A., Campbell, E.: Modern urology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Cabot, Lea and Febiger 1936.Google Scholar
  167. Rizzi, R.: Ureterectasie senza ostacoli meccanici. Acalasia degli shocci ureterali. Arch. ital. Urol. 12, 93 (1953).Google Scholar
  168. Roberts, R. R.: Complete valve of the ureter: congenital urethral valves. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 76, 62–65(1956).Google Scholar
  169. Ronchetti, G. C.: Ipoplasia renale congnita con mega-uretere ed uretere accessorio complicato da idronefrosi e reflusso vesico ureterale. Minerva pediat. 10, 1334 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Ronnick, H. C: Practice of urology. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co. 1949.Google Scholar
  171. Roux, M., Caillet, A.: A propos d’un cas de mega-uretere amélioré par la splanchnicectomie. J. Urol. méd. chir. 52, 247 (1944–1945).Google Scholar
  172. Ruland, L.: Zur Innervation des Nierenbeckens und des Harnleiters bei tonogenen Funktionsstörungen. Z. Urol. 49, 697 (1956).Google Scholar
  173. Saint-Martin, E. C., Pasquier, C. M., Jr., Campbell, J. H.: Dilatation of the lower ureter: consideration of the clinical significance. Sth. med. J. (Bgham, Ala.) 49, 698 (1956).Google Scholar
  174. Salmoni, R.: Dilatazione e mega-uretere. Urologia (Treviso) 21, 5 (1954).Google Scholar
  175. Sampson, J. A.: Ascending renal infections. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 14, 194–334 (1903).Google Scholar
  176. Satani, Y.: Experimental studies of ureter. Am. J. Physiol. 49, 474 (1919a).Google Scholar
  177. Satani, Y.: Histologic study of the ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 3, 247–267 (1919b).Google Scholar
  178. Scardino, P. L.: Management of ureteral obstruction in children. J. med. Ass. Ga. 40, 164 (1951).Google Scholar
  179. Schmutte, K.: Ein Fall von kongenitalem Megalo-Ureter. Z. Urol. 21, 608 (1927).Google Scholar
  180. Selli, M.: Su alcuni casi di mega-uretere. Chir. gen. (Perugia) 2, 533 (1953).Google Scholar
  181. Shalit, S., Morales, P.: Ureteral activity in paraplegia. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 96, 876–884 (1966).Google Scholar
  182. Silverman, F. M., Huang, N.: Congenital absence of the abdominal muscles associated with malformation of the genito-urinary and alimentary tracts: report of cases and review of literature. Amer. J. Dis. Childh. 80, 91–124 (1950).Google Scholar
  183. Simon, H. B., Culp, O.S., Parkhill, E. M.: Congenital ureteral valves: report of two cases. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 74, 336–341 (1955).Google Scholar
  184. Slater, S.: Ureteral atresia producing giant hydroureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 78,135–137 (1957).Google Scholar
  185. Stein, J., Weinberg, S. R.: A histologic study of the normal and dilated ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 87, 33–38 (1962).Google Scholar
  186. Stephens, F. D.: Mega-ureter. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 23, 197 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Stephens, F. D., Joske, R. A., Simmons, R. T.: Mega-ureter with vesico-ureteric reflux in twins. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 24, 192 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Stöhr, P. H., Jr.: Über die Innervation der Harnblase und der Samenblase beim Menschen. Z. Anat. 78, 555–584 (1926).Google Scholar
  189. Stöhr, P. H., Jr.: Innervation der Exkretionsorgane. Hausbuch mikr. Anat. Menschen IV, suppl. 1. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 1957.Google Scholar
  190. Swenson, O.: A new concept of the pathology of megalo-ureters. Surgery 32, 367–371 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Swenson, O.: Congenital defects in the pelvic parasympathetic system. Arch. Dis. Childh. 30, 1 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Swenson, O., Fisher, J. H.: The relation of megacolon and megalo-ureter. New Engl. J. Med. 253,1147–1150(1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Swenson, O., Fischer, J. H.: New techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of megalo-ureters. Pediatrics 18, 304–313 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Swenson, O., Fisher, J. H., Cendron, J.: Megalo-ureter; investigation as to cause and report on the results of newer forms of the treatment. Surgery 40, 223–233 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Swenson, O., MacMahon, H. E., Jacques, W. E., Campbell, J. S.: A new concept of etiology of megalo-ureter. New Engl. J. Med. 246, 41–46 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Swenson, O., Rheinlander, H. F., Diamond, J.: Hirschsprung’s disease, new concepts of etiology, operative results in 34 patients. New Engl. J. Med. 241, 551–556 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Swenson, O., Smyth, B. T.: Aperistaltic megalo-ureter: treatment by bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy using a new technique, preliminary communication. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 82, 62– 67 (1959).Google Scholar
  198. Tanagho, E. A.: Ureteral tailoring. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 106, 194–197 (1971).Google Scholar
  199. Tanagho, E. A., Meyers, F. H.: Trigonal hypertrophy: a cause of ureteral obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 93, 678–683 (1965).Google Scholar
  200. Tanagho, E. A., Pugh, R. C: The anatomy and function of the uretero-vesical junction. Brit. J. Urol. 35, 151–165(1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Tanagho, E. A., Smith, D. R., Guthrie, T. H.: Patho-physiology of functional ureteral obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 104, 73 (1970).Google Scholar
  202. Torbey, K., Leadbetter, W. F.: Innervation of the bladder and lower ureter: studies on pelvic nerve section and stimulation in the dogs. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 90, 395–404 (1963).Google Scholar
  203. Trattner, H. R.: Ureteral activity in some pathologic conditions. Arch. Surg. 17, 968 (1928).Google Scholar
  204. Trattner, H. R.: Graphic record of function of the human ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 28, 1 (1933).Google Scholar
  205. Versari, R.: Lamorfogenesi della gualna dell’uretere umane. Ric. Lab. anat. norm. r. Univ. Roma. XV, 125–134 (1909–1910).Google Scholar
  206. Waldeyer, W.: Bemerkungen über die Lage des Ureter. Verh. anat. Ges. (Jena) 18–21 (1897).Google Scholar
  207. Wall, B., Wachter, H. E.: Congenital ureteral valves, its role as a primary obstructive lesion: classification of the literature and report of an authentic case. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 68, 684 (1952).Google Scholar
  208. Wayman, T. B.: Surgical treatment of megalo-ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 61, 883 (1949).Google Scholar
  209. Wells, C.: Discussion and anomalies of the ureter in childhood. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 43, 275 (1950).Google Scholar
  210. Wharton, L. R.: The innervation of the ureter. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 28, 639 (1933).Google Scholar
  211. Williams, D. I.: Discussion on the chronically dilated ureter. Proc. roy. Soc. Med. 45, 840 (1952).Google Scholar
  212. Williams, D. I.: The chronically dilated ureter. Ann. roy. Coll. Surg. Engl. 14, 107 (1954a).Google Scholar
  213. Williams, D. I.: The radiological diagnosis of lower urinary obstruction in the early years. Brit. J. Radiol. 27, 473 (1954b).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  214. Williams, D. I.: Urological problems of childhood. Postgrad, med. J. 31, 360 (1955).Google Scholar
  215. Williams, D. I.: The congenital neurogenic bladder. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 49, 896 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. Williams, D.I.: Congenital bladder neck obstruction and megaureter: clinical observations. Brit. J. Urol. 29, 389–392 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Williams, D. I.: Mega-ureter. Postgrad, med. J. 34, 159 (1958).Google Scholar
  218. Williams, D. I., Hulme Moir, I.: Primary obstructive mega-ureter. Brit. J. Urol. 42, 140 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. Wislocki, G. B., O’Conor, V.J.: Experimental observations uppon ureters with especial reference to peristalsis and antiperistalsis. Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 31, 197 (1920).Google Scholar
  220. Withycombe, J. F. R. : A case of trifid ureter and segmental hydro-ureter. Brit. J. Surg. 38, 113 (1950–1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Woodburne, R. T.: Anatomy of the uretero-vesical junction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 92, 431–435 (1964).Google Scholar
  222. Woodburne, R. T.: The ureter, uretero-vesical junction, and vesical trigone. Anat. Rec. 151, 243–249 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. Wrenn, E. L.: Proposed operation for megalo-ureter. Surgery 54, 950–952 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  224. Young, B. W., Davis, D. M.: Young’s practice of urology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. 1926.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Küss
    • 1
  • Christian Chatelain
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté de Médecine Pitié-SalpêtrièreParis-Cedex 13France

Personalised recommendations