The Paleoecological and Environmental Significance Of Trace Fossils
Trace fossils have great paleoecologic utility because they are (1) widespread in space and time, (2) found in place, and (3) largely the record of animal behavior and response, making them ideal indicators of environmental conditions.
Traces may be used together with body fossils to increase knowledge of taxonomic richness in an ancient biotic assemblage. The morphology of traces may be used to reconstruct modes of feeding by many trace-producing organisms. The orientation of traces within sediments is sensitive to such depth-related variables as salinity, temperature, and food supply. Adaptation of many shallow-water benthos for vertical burrowing reflects the effectiveness of sedimentary cover as a temperature and salinity “buffer.” Gradients in dissolved oxygen may be detected by size gradients in burrow diameter. Low-oxygen marine environments are characterized by small-diameter horizontal feeding traces.
Primary deformational features of traces may be used to reconstruct the original water content of the sea floor (bottom hardness). In addition, the presence or absence of shallow burrows, the preserved evidence of vertical movement reflected by specific types of traces, and gradients in intensity of bioturbation may be used to reconstruct relative and, in some cases, absolute rates of sedimentation or erosion.
The greatest value of trace fossils in paleoecologic reconstruction is realized when they are used as independent evidence brought together with other sources of paleoecologic data. An interpretive, environmental model is proposed here in which information gained from the relative abundance of body and trace fossils is integrated; in this model, eight biolithofacies are recognized.
KeywordsTrace Fossil Suspension Feeder Deposit Feeder Environmental Reconstruction Body Fossil
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alexander, W. B. et al. 1955. Survey of the Tees. Part II—the estuary—chemical and biological. Dept. Sci. Indust. Res., Water Pollution Res. Tech. Paper 5, 171 p.Google Scholar
- Bromley, R. G. 1970. Borings as trace fossils and Entobia cretacea Portlock, as an example. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. 3:49–90.Google Scholar
- Byers, C. 1972. Analysis of paleoenvironments in Devonian black shale by means of biogenic structures (abs.). Geol. Soc. America, Abs. Prog., 4(7):464.Google Scholar
- Frey, R. W. 1971. Ichnology—the study of fossil and recent lebensspuren. In B. F. Perkins (ed.), Trace fossils, a field guide. Louisiana State Univ., School Geosci., Misc. Publ. 71–1:91–125.Google Scholar
- Frey, R. W. 1972. Paleoecology and depositional environment of Fort Hays Limestone Member, Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous), west-central Kansas. Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contr., Art. 58, 72 p.Google Scholar
- Frey, R. W. and T. M. Chowns. 1972. Trace fossils from the Ringgold road cut (Ordovician and Silurian), Georgia. In T. M. Chowns (ed.), Sedimentary environments in the Paleozoic rocks of northwest Georgia. Georgia Geol. Surv., Guidebook 11:25–55.Google Scholar
- Frey, R. W. and T. V. Mayou. 1971. Decapod burrows in Holocene barrier island beaches and washover fans, Georgia. Sencken-bergiana Marit., 3:53–77.Google Scholar
- Golubic, S. and J. Schneider. 1972. Relationship between carbonate substrate and boring patterns of marine endolithic microorganisms (abs.). Geol. Soc. America, Abs. Prog., 4(7):518.Google Scholar
- Hecker, R. T. 1970. Palaeoichnological research in the Palaeontological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:215–226.Google Scholar
- Hertweck, G. 1970. The animal communities of a muddy environment and the development of biofacies as affected by the life cycle of the characteristic species. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:263–282.Google Scholar
- Howard, J. D. 1971. Trace fossils as paleoecological tools. In J. D. Howard et al., Recent advances in paleoecology and ichnology. Amer. Geol. Inst., Short Course Lect. Notes, p. 184–212.Google Scholar
- Johnson, R. G. 1964. The community approach to paleoecology. In J. Imbrie and N. D. Newell (eds.), Approaches to paleoecology. New York, John Wiley, p. 107–134.Google Scholar
- Moore, D. G. and P. C. Scruton. 1957. Minor internal structures of some recent unconsolidated sediments. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Bull., 41:2723–2751.Google Scholar
- Osgood, R. G., Jr. and E. J. Szmuc. 1972. The trace fossilZoophycos as an indicator of water depth. Bulls. Amer. Paleont., 62:1–22.Google Scholar
- Reineck, H.-E. 1967. Layered sediments of tidal flats, beaches, and shelf bottoms of the North Sea. In B. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. Amer. Assoc. Advmt. Sci., Publ. 83:191–206.Google Scholar
- Reineck, H.-E. (ed.). 1970. Das Watt. Frankfurt, W. Kramer, 142 p.Google Scholar
- Reineck, H.-E. et al. 1968. Sedimentologie, Faunen-zonierung und Faziesabfolge vor der Ostküste der inneren Deutschen Bucht. Senckenbergiana Leth., 49:261–309.Google Scholar
- Rhoads, D. C. 1966. Missing fossils and paleoecology. Discovery, Yale Peabody Mus., 2: 19–22.Google Scholar
- Rhoads, D. C. 1970. Mass properties, stability, and ecology of marine muds related to burrowing activity. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:391–406.Google Scholar
- Rhoads, D. C. and D. K. Young. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding benthos on bottom sediment stability and community trophic structure. Jour. Marine Res., 28:150–178.Google Scholar
- Rhoads, D. C. et al. 1972. Trophic group analysis of Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) bivalve assemblages from South Dakota. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Bull., 56:1100–1113.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, J. and R. C. Gutschick. 1970. Late Devonian—Early Mississippian ichnofossils from western Montana and northern Utah. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3: 407–438.Google Scholar
- Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Amer. Naturalist, 162: 243–282.Google Scholar
- Sanders, H. L. et al. 1965. Salinity and faunal distribution in the Pocasset River, Massachusetts. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10:216–229.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and palaeoecology of marine environments. Edinburgh and Chicago, Oliver & Boyd and Univ. Chicago Press, 568 p.Google Scholar
- Seilacher, A. 1963. Lebensspuren und salinitatsfazies. Fortschr. Geol. Rheinhld. u. Westf., 10:81–94.Google Scholar
- Seilacher, A. 1964. Biogenic sedimentary structures. In J. Imbrie and N. D. Newell (eds.), Approaches to paleoecology. New York, John Wiley, p. 296–316.Google Scholar
- Walker, K. R. 1972. Trophic analysis: a method for studying the function of ancient communities. Jour. Paleont., 46:82–93.Google Scholar
- Walker, K. R. and L. F. Laporte. 1970. Congruent fossil communities from Ordovician and Devonian carbonates of New York. Jour. Paleont., 44:928–944.Google Scholar