The Paleoecological and Environmental Significance Of Trace Fossils

  • Donald C. Rhoads

Synopsis

Trace fossils have great paleoecologic utility because they are (1) widespread in space and time, (2) found in place, and (3) largely the record of animal behavior and response, making them ideal indicators of environmental conditions.

Traces may be used together with body fossils to increase knowledge of taxonomic richness in an ancient biotic assemblage. The morphology of traces may be used to reconstruct modes of feeding by many trace-producing organisms. The orientation of traces within sediments is sensitive to such depth-related variables as salinity, temperature, and food supply. Adaptation of many shallow-water benthos for vertical burrowing reflects the effectiveness of sedimentary cover as a temperature and salinity “buffer.” Gradients in dissolved oxygen may be detected by size gradients in burrow diameter. Low-oxygen marine environments are characterized by small-diameter horizontal feeding traces.

Primary deformational features of traces may be used to reconstruct the original water content of the sea floor (bottom hardness). In addition, the presence or absence of shallow burrows, the preserved evidence of vertical movement reflected by specific types of traces, and gradients in intensity of bioturbation may be used to reconstruct relative and, in some cases, absolute rates of sedimentation or erosion.

The greatest value of trace fossils in paleoecologic reconstruction is realized when they are used as independent evidence brought together with other sources of paleoecologic data. An interpretive, environmental model is proposed here in which information gained from the relative abundance of body and trace fossils is integrated; in this model, eight biolithofacies are recognized.

Keywords

Sedimentation Shale Cretaceous Beach Petrol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, W. B. et al. 1955. Survey of the Tees. Part II—the estuary—chemical and biological. Dept. Sci. Indust. Res., Water Pollution Res. Tech. Paper 5, 171 p.Google Scholar
  2. Bowen, Z. et al. 1974. Marine benthic communities in the Upper Devonian of New York. Lethaia, 7:93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bromley, R. G. 1970. Borings as trace fossils and Entobia cretacea Portlock, as an example. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. 3:49–90.Google Scholar
  4. Byers, C. 1972. Analysis of paleoenvironments in Devonian black shale by means of biogenic structures (abs.). Geol. Soc. America, Abs. Prog., 4(7):464.Google Scholar
  5. Farrow, G. E. 1966. Bathymetric zonation of Jurassic trace fossils from the coast of Yorkshire, England. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2:103–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frey, R. W. 1971. Ichnology—the study of fossil and recent lebensspuren. In B. F. Perkins (ed.), Trace fossils, a field guide. Louisiana State Univ., School Geosci., Misc. Publ. 71–1:91–125.Google Scholar
  7. Frey, R. W. 1972. Paleoecology and depositional environment of Fort Hays Limestone Member, Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous), west-central Kansas. Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contr., Art. 58, 72 p.Google Scholar
  8. Frey, R. W. and T. M. Chowns. 1972. Trace fossils from the Ringgold road cut (Ordovician and Silurian), Georgia. In T. M. Chowns (ed.), Sedimentary environments in the Paleozoic rocks of northwest Georgia. Georgia Geol. Surv., Guidebook 11:25–55.Google Scholar
  9. Frey, R. W. and T. V. Mayou. 1971. Decapod burrows in Holocene barrier island beaches and washover fans, Georgia. Sencken-bergiana Marit., 3:53–77.Google Scholar
  10. Goldring, R. 1964. Trace fossils and the sedimentary surface in shallow-water marine sediments. In L. M. J. U. van Straaten (ed.), Deltaic and shallow marine deposits. Developments in Sedimentology, 1:136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golubic, S. and J. Schneider. 1972. Relationship between carbonate substrate and boring patterns of marine endolithic microorganisms (abs.). Geol. Soc. America, Abs. Prog., 4(7):518.Google Scholar
  12. Hecker, R. T. 1970. Palaeoichnological research in the Palaeontological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:215–226.Google Scholar
  13. Hertweck, G. 1970. The animal communities of a muddy environment and the development of biofacies as affected by the life cycle of the characteristic species. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:263–282.Google Scholar
  14. Howard, J. D. 1971. Trace fossils as paleoecological tools. In J. D. Howard et al., Recent advances in paleoecology and ichnology. Amer. Geol. Inst., Short Course Lect. Notes, p. 184–212.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, R. G. 1964. The community approach to paleoecology. In J. Imbrie and N. D. Newell (eds.), Approaches to paleoecology. New York, John Wiley, p. 107–134.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, R. G. 1965. Temperature variation in the infaunal environment of a sand flat. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10:114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levinton, J. S. and R. K. Bambach. 1970. Some ecological aspects of bivalve mortality patterns. Amer. Jour. Sci., 268:97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mlester, A. L. and D. C. Rhoads. 1967. Bivalves as bathymetric indicators. Marine Geol., 5:383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, D. G. and P. C. Scruton. 1957. Minor internal structures of some recent unconsolidated sediments. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Bull., 41:2723–2751.Google Scholar
  20. Osgood, R. G., Jr. and E. J. Szmuc. 1972. The trace fossilZoophycos as an indicator of water depth. Bulls. Amer. Paleont., 62:1–22.Google Scholar
  21. Raff, R. A. and E. C. Raff. 1970. Respiratory mechanisms and the fossil record. Nature, 228:1003–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reineck, H.-E. 1967. Layered sediments of tidal flats, beaches, and shelf bottoms of the North Sea. In B. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. Amer. Assoc. Advmt. Sci., Publ. 83:191–206.Google Scholar
  23. Reineck, H.-E. (ed.). 1970. Das Watt. Frankfurt, W. Kramer, 142 p.Google Scholar
  24. Reineck, H.-E. et al. 1968. Sedimentologie, Faunen-zonierung und Faziesabfolge vor der Ostküste der inneren Deutschen Bucht. Senckenbergiana Leth., 49:261–309.Google Scholar
  25. Rhoads, D. C. 1966. Missing fossils and paleoecology. Discovery, Yale Peabody Mus., 2: 19–22.Google Scholar
  26. Rhoads, D. C. 1967. Biogenic reworking of intertidal and subtidal sediments in Barnstable Harbor and Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. Jour. Geol., 75:461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhoads, D. C. 1970. Mass properties, stability, and ecology of marine muds related to burrowing activity. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:391–406.Google Scholar
  28. Rhoads, D. C. and J. Morse. 1970. Evolutionary and ecologic significance of oxygen deficient marine basins. Lethaia, 4:413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhoads, D. C. and D. K. Young. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding benthos on bottom sediment stability and community trophic structure. Jour. Marine Res., 28:150–178.Google Scholar
  30. Rhoads, D. C. et al. 1972. Trophic group analysis of Upper Cretaceous (Maestrichtian) bivalve assemblages from South Dakota. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Bull., 56:1100–1113.Google Scholar
  31. Rodriguez, J. and R. C. Gutschick. 1970. Late Devonian—Early Mississippian ichnofossils from western Montana and northern Utah. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3: 407–438.Google Scholar
  32. Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Amer. Naturalist, 162: 243–282.Google Scholar
  33. Sanders, H. L. et al. 1965. Salinity and faunal distribution in the Pocasset River, Massachusetts. Limnol. Oceanogr., 10:216–229.Google Scholar
  34. Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and palaeoecology of marine environments. Edinburgh and Chicago, Oliver & Boyd and Univ. Chicago Press, 568 p.Google Scholar
  35. Seilacher, A. 1963. Lebensspuren und salinitatsfazies. Fortschr. Geol. Rheinhld. u. Westf., 10:81–94.Google Scholar
  36. Seilacher, A. 1964. Biogenic sedimentary structures. In J. Imbrie and N. D. Newell (eds.), Approaches to paleoecology. New York, John Wiley, p. 296–316.Google Scholar
  37. Seilacher, A. 1967. Bathymetry of trace fossils. Marine Geol., 5:413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Theede, H. et al. 1969. Studies on the resistance of marine bottom invertebrates to oxygen-deficiency and hydrogen sulphide. Marine Biol., 2:325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, K. R. 1972. Trophic analysis: a method for studying the function of ancient communities. Jour. Paleont., 46:82–93.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, K. R. and R. K. Bambach. 1974. Feeding by benthic invertebrates: classification and terminology for paleoecological analysis. Lethaia, 7:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walker, K. R. and L. F. Laporte. 1970. Congruent fossil communities from Ordovician and Devonian carbonates of New York. Jour. Paleont., 44:928–944.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald C. Rhoads
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations