Streaming-Potential Effects in Saturated Water Flow through a Sand-Kaolinite Mixture

  • S. Gairon
  • D. Swartzendruber
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 4)

Abstract

That the viscous flow of water through a capillary tube or a watersaturated porous medium can give rise to an electrical streaming potential, directed oppositely to the direction of liquid flow, is a well-recognized phenomenon normally accounted for in terms of the electrical double layer (Abramson, 1934; Overbeek, 1952). Several recent reviews with special emphasis on soil water are available (Ravina and Zaslavsky, 1968 a, b). To investigate the role of zeta potential in the mechanism of sand filtration, Edwards and Monke (1967a, b) have sought to use streaming potential, while Abaza and Clyde (1969) have suggested it as a measure of water flow rate.

Keywords

Clay Quartz Filtration Mercury Cage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abaza, M. M. I., Clyde, C. G.: Evaluation of the rate of flow through porous media using electrokinetic phenomena. Water Resources Res. 5, 470–483 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramson, H. A.: Electrokinetic Phenomena and Their Application to Biology and Medicine. New York: Chemical Catalog Co. 1934.Google Scholar
  3. Bull, H. B., Gortner, R. A.: Electrokinetic potentials. X. The effect of particle size on the potential. J. Phys. Chem. 36, 111–119 (1932).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, D. M., Monke, E. J.: Electrokinetic instrumentation applied to the slow-sand filtration process. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 10, 435–438 (1967 a).Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, D. M., Monke, E. J.: Electrokinetic studies of slow sand filtration process. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc. 59, 1310–1319 (1967b).Google Scholar
  6. Gupta, R. P., Swartzendruber, D.: Flow-associated reduction in the hydraulic conductivity of quartz sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 26, 6–10 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunter, A. J., Alexander, A. E.: Some notes on the measurement of electrokinetic potentials. J. Colloid Sci. 17, 781–788 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janz, G. J., Taniguchi, H.: Silver-silver-chloride electrodes: Preparation, stability, reproducibility and standard potentials in aqueous and nonaqueous media. Chem. Rev. 53, 397–438 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Michaels, A. S., Lin, C. S.: Effects of counterelectro-osmosis and sodium ion exchange on permeability of kaolinite. Ind. Eng. Chem. 47, 1249–1253 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Overbeek, J. T. G.: Electrokinetic phenomena. In: Colloid science. Ed.: H. R. Kruyt. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1952, 2, pp. 194–207.Google Scholar
  11. Ravina, I., Zaslavsky, D.: Nonlinear electrokinetic phenomena. I: Review of literature. Soil Sci. 106, 60–66 (1968 a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ravina, I., Zaslavsky, D.: Nonlinear electrokinetic phenomena. Part II: Experiments with electrophoresis of clay particles. Soil Sci. 106, 94–100 (1968 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Swartzendruber, D.: Soil-water behavior as described by transport coefficients and functions. Adv. Agron. 18, 327–370 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Winterkorn, H. F.: Water movement through porous hydrophilic systems under capillary, electrical, and thermal potentials. Amer. Soc. Testing Materials, Spec. Tech. Pub. 163, 1955, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin — Heidelberg 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Gairon
  • D. Swartzendruber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations