Advertisement

The Ultrastructure of the Photosensible Elements in the Eyes of Collembola and Their Orientation (Insecta)

  • H. F. Paulus

Abstract

Collembola maximally have eight ommatidia on each side of the head, forming a so-called “atypical complex eye”. Their constructions are remarkably different within the order. In respect to their symmetries the rhabdoms of the known species can be distinguished in (1) completely irregular rhabdoms (Orchesella), (2) radial symmetrical rhabdoms (Tomocerus, Sminthurides), (3) bilateral symmetrical rhabdoms (Podura, Neanura, Entomobrya, Allacma (Sminthurus). All rhabdoms consist of eight retinula cells (except in Sminthurides) which form a photosensible part in a very different manner. In Orchesella, Allacma and Entomobrya you may find eight, in Tomocerus seven, in Podura four or six (double eye!), and in Neanura six rhabdomeres. In the compound eye of Podura all rhabdoms considered as cross-sections (fig. 3) lie parallel to one another (disregarding the curvature of the complex). In that of Entomobrya they lie in distinct angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° to one another (fig. 4).

Keywords

Natural Position Retinula Cell Crystalline Cone Vergence Angle High Insect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DANNEEL, R., ZEUTZSCHEL, B.: Ueber den Feinbau der Retinula bei Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Naturforsch. 12 B, 580–584 (1957).Google Scholar
  2. HESSE, R.: Untersuchungen über die Organe der Lichtempfindungen bei niederen Tieren. VII. Von den Arthropodenaugen. Z. wiss. Zool. 70, 347–473 (1901).Google Scholar
  3. HORRIDGE, G.A.: The retina of the locust. in “The functional organization of the compound eye” (Bernhard, C.G. edit.) Pergamon Press Oxford, 513–541 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. PAULUS, H.F.: Zur Feinstruktur des zusammengesetzten Auges von Orchesella. Z. Naturforsch. 25 B, 380–381 (1970a).Google Scholar
  5. PAULUS, H.F.: Das Komplexauge von Podura aquatica, ein primitives Doppelauge. Naturwiss. 57, 502 (1970b).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. PAULUS, H.F.: Der Feinbau der Komplexaugen einiger Collembolen, eine vergleichend anatomische Untersuchung. Zool. Jb. Anat. 89 (1), 1–116 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. SCHALLER, F.: Zur Frage des Formsehens bei Collembolen. Verh. Dt. Zool. Ges. 1968 (Kiel), Zool. Anz. Suppl. 32, 368–375 (1969).Google Scholar
  8. SCHALLER, F.: Collembola. in Handb. Zool. 4 (2), 2/1, 72 pp., Walter de Gryter, Berlin (1970).Google Scholar
  9. SCHNEIDER, L., LANGER, H.: Die Struktur des Rhabdoms im Doppelauge des Wasserläufers Gerris lacustris. Z. Zellf. 99, 538–559 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. WACHMANN, E.: Zum Feinbau der Ommatidien von Pteronemobius heydeni (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Z. Zellf. 99, 263–276 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. WILLEM, V.: Recherches sur les Collemboles et les Thysanoures. Mem. C. et Mem. Sav. Etrang. Acad. Roy. Belg. 58, 1–144 (1887).Google Scholar
  12. WOLKEN, J.J.: Invertebrate photoreceptors, a comparative analysis. Acad. Press, New York, 179 pp. (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Paulus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations