Skip to main content

Chinese Philosophy and Human Rights: An Application of Comparative Ethics

  • Chapter
Ethics in Business and Society

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy ((SEEP))

  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

For the past several years a controversy has raged about the applicability of ethical concepts like “human rights” to non-Western or developing societies and specifically to China. It is a debate with particular urgency in Hong Kong where past and future history complicate matters. A 1993 meeting among Asian nations in Bangkok turned on this one issue. The 1993 “Bangkok Declaration” compromised on the following formulation: 8. Recognise that while human rights are universal in nature, they must be considered in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norm-setting bearing in mind the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds…

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Ames, Roger, 1983, The Art of Rulership: A Study in Ancient Chinese Political Thought, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger, & David Hall, 1987, Thinking Through Confucius, Albany, State University of New York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger, & David Hall, 1988, “Rites as Rights: The Confucian Alternative”, pp. 199–214 in Leroy S. Rouner (ed.), Human Rights and the World’s Religions, South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon, 1984, Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language, Oxford, Clarendon Press, p. 368

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius, The Analects (Harvard Yenching Concordance Series, No. 16, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, Anthony S., 1985, Ethical Argumentation: A Study in Hsun Tzu’s Moral Epistemology, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Raymond, 1981, Confucius, New York, Hill and Wang

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBary, W. Theodore, 1988, “Neo-Confucianism and Human Rights” pp. 183–98, in Leroy S. Rouner (ed.), Human Rights and the World’s Religions, South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, Alan, 1977, The Theory of Morality, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald, 1977, Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert, 1990, The Confucian Creation of Heaven, Buffalo, SUNY Series in Chinese Philosophy and Culture

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert, 1972, Confucius: The Secular as Sacred, New York, Harper and Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert, 1979, “Following the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects”, Studies in Classical Chinese Thought, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Thematic Issue vol. 47/3, 373–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan, 1990, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Angus, 1964, “The Place of Reason in the Chinese Philosophical Tradition”, pp. 28–56 in Raymond Dawson (ed.), The Legacy of China, London, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Angus, 1967, “The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature”, Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 6/1-2, 215–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Angus 1978, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, Hong Kong and London, Chinese University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad, 1985a, “Individualism in Chinese Thought”, pp. 35–56, in Donald Munro (ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad, 1985b, “Punishment and Dignity in China”, pp. 359–82, in Donald Munro (ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad, April 1972, “Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Confucian Ethics”, Philosophy East and West, 22/2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad May 1993, “Chinese Ideographs and Western Ideas”, Journal of Asian Studies Harman, Gilbert, 1977, The Nature of Morality, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Kungchuan (trans. F.W. Mote), 1979, A History of Chinese Political Thought, Volume I: From the Beginnings to the Sixth Century A.D., Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E.R., 1942, Chinese Philosophy in Classical Times, London, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, P.J., January 1990, “Reweaving the ‘One Thread’ of The Analects”, Philosophy East and West, XL/1, 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip, 1993, “The Evolution of Human Altruism”, The Journal of Philosophy, 90/10,497–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Qichao, 1930, History of Chinese Political Thought, London, Kegan Paul Trench Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, David, 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart, 1859, “On Liberty”, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Donald J., 1969, The Concept of Man in Early China, Stanford, Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, Donald J., 1985, Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Andrew, 1985, Chinese Democracy, Berkeley, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek, 1984, Reasons and Persons, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John, 1980, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”, The Journal of Philosophy, Sept. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John, 1993, Political Liberalism, New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetz, Heiner, 1992, Confucian Ethics in the Axial Age, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry Jr., 1988, “Why Take Rights Seriously? A Confucian Critique”, pp. 167–82, in Leroy S. Rouner (ed.), Human Rights and the World’s Religions, South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry Jr., 1991, A Chinese Mirror: Moral Reflections on Political Economy and Society, LaSalle, IL, Open Court

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouner, Leroy S., 1988, Human Rights and the World’s Religions, South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. xviii & 220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, C. (1996). Chinese Philosophy and Human Rights: An Application of Comparative Ethics. In: Becker, G.K. (eds) Ethics in Business and Society. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61442-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61442-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64845-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-61442-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics