Skip to main content

The influence of carbon budget methodology on assessments of the impacts of forest management on the carbon balance

  • Conference paper
Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASII,volume 40))

Abstract

There is now a substantial body of literature in scientific journals on the carbon (C) balance of forest ecosystems at all geographical scales, and some authors have proposed changes in the way forests are managed in order to enhance the offsetting or reduction of emissions of C to the atmosphere. As yet, however, there is no widely accepted and applied method for estimating the C budget of forests and the impacts of forest management on C sequestration. This paper describes how the results of C budgeting exercises depend strongly on the methodologies employed, and briefly considers the scope for developing conventions for the calculation and presentation of C budgets for forest ecosystems and forestry projects. These points are illustrated using examples of model simulations of the effects of alternative methods of forest management in Britain, and by comparison of published results of studies in other countries based on different C budgeting methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Shiel RS, Whitby MC (1991) Dynamics of land use change and the carbon balance. ESRC Countryside Change Initiative Working Paper 15. University of Newcastle-on- Tyne, Newcastle, UK, 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Shiel RS, Whitby MC (1992) Carbon dynamics of land use in Great Britain. J. Environ. Manage. 36: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alban DH, Perala DA (1992) Carbon storage in Lake States aspen ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1107–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armentano TV (1984) Effects of increased wood energy consumption on carbon storage in forests of the United States. Environ. Manage. 8: 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering TD (1992) Using tropical forests to fix atmospheric carbon: the potential in theory and practice. Ambio 21:414–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey RA, Plantinga AJ, Heath LS (1993) Past and prospective carbon storage in United States forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 58: 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer G (1979) Can forest policy contribute to solving the CO2 problem? Environment International, 2: 449–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Lugo AE, Iverson LR (1992) Processes and lands for sequestering carbon in the tropical forest landscape. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 64: 139–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell MGR, Dewar RC (1995) The carbon sink provided by plantation forests and their products in Britain. Forestry 68: 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper C (1983) Carbon storage in managed forests. Can. J. For. Res. 13: 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper WP, Ewel KC (1983) Computer simulation of long-term carbon storage patterns in Florida slash pine plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 6: 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper WP, Ewel KC (1987) A regional carbon storage simulation for laige-scale biomass plantations. Ecol. Model. 36: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar RC (1990) A model of carbon storage in forests and forest products. Tree Physiol. 6: 417–428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar RC (1991) Analytical model of carbon storage in trees, soils and wood products of managed forests. Tree Physiol. 8: 239–258.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiol. 11: 49–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson FJ (1977) Can we control the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Energy 2: 287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson FJ, Marland G (1979) Technical fixes for the climatic effects of CO2. In: Elliott WP, Machta L (eds) Workshop on the global effects of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels, Miami Beach, Florida, March 7-11, 1977, US Department of Energy, CQNF-770385, US Department of Energy, Washington DC, pp 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischlin A, Bugmann HKM (1994) Think globally, act locally! A small country case study in reducing net CO2 emissions by carbon fixation policies. In: Kanninen M (ed) Carbon balance of the world’s forested ecosystems: towards a global assessment. Proceedings of a workshop held by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AFOS, Joensuu, Finland, 11-15 May 1992, Painatuskeskus, Helsinki, pp 256-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman B, Meth F, Hickman C (1992) Temperate forest as a carbon-storage reservoir for carbon dioxide emitted by coal-fired generating stations. A case study for New Brunswick, Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 55: 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graudal L (1991) The greenhouse effect and carbon storage in forests and forest products with special reference to Danish forests. Dansk Skovbrugs Tidsskrift 76: 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor HD (1992) The potential of temperate forests as sinks for CO2—examples from the German environmental policy against global warming. Should we store carbon in trees? Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 64: 197–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DO, Mynick HE, Williams RH (1990) Carbon sequestration versus fossil fuel substitution. Alternative roles for biomass in coping with greenhouse warming. Princeton University Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Report 255, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 44 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DO, Mynick HE, Williams RH (1991) Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy. Nature 353: 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Ferrell WK, Franklin JF (1990) Effects on carbon storage of conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science 247: 699–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil GW, Gerrits M, Janssen LHJM, Weenink JB (1994) A simulation model to evaluate CO? sink enhancement—modelling the carbon storage and the carbon balance of forested ecosystems in the Netherlands. In: Kanninen M (ed) Carbon balance of the world’s forested ecosystems: towards a global assessment. Proc. Workshop Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AFOS, Joensuu, Finland, 11-15 May 1992, Painatuskeskus, Helsinki, pp 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson OQ (1990)How does forestry influence atmospheric carbon? Forestry Chron. 66:469–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen HF, Solberg B (1994) Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. For. Sci. 40: 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG (1989) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forests. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lon. B 324: 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MG, Kern JS (1991) Sequestering carbon in soils: a workshop to explore the potential of mitigating global climate change, 26-29 February 1990, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. USEPA Report EPA/600/3-91/031. USEPA, Corvallis, OR, 85 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayes RJ, Arden-Clarke C, Taylor PJ (1990) An assessment of the feasibility of large-scale afforestation in Britain to offset carbon dioxide emissions. Political Ecology Research Group Research Report RR-19. Political Ecology Research Group, Oxford, 98 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch P (1992) Wood versus nonwood materials in U.S. residential construction: some energy-related global implications. For. Prods. J. 42: 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaren JP, Wakelin SJ (1991) Forestry and forest products as a carbon sink in New Zealand. Forest Research Institute Bulletin 162. FRI, Rotorua, New Zealand, 360 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G (1988) The prospects of solving the CO2 problem through global afforestations. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report DOE/NBB-0082. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, TN, 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G, Marland S (1992) Should we store carbon in trees? Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 64: 181–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW (1992) Forests and arable energy crops in Britain: can they help stop global warming? In: Richards GE (ed) Wood: Fuel for Thought. Proc. Conf. Energy Technology Support Unit, Bristol, England, 23-25 October 1991, Harwell, UK, pp 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW (1992a) Forests and arable energy crops In Britain: can they help stop global warming? In: Richards GE (ed) Wood: Fuel for Thought. Proc. Conf. Energy Technology Support Unit, Bristol, England, 23-25 October 1991, Harwell, UK, pp 39–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW (1992b) Role of carbon budgeting in assessing environmental costs and benefits of forestry schemes. In: Richards GE (ed) Wood: Energy and the Environment. Proc. Conf. Energy Technology Support Unit, Harrogate, England, 9-10 September 1992, Harwell, UK, pp 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RW (1994) Towards a methodology for the evaluation of the carbon budget of forests. In: Kanninen M (ed) Carbon balance of the world’s forested ecosystems: towards a global assessment. Proc. Workshop Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AFOS, Joensuu, Finland, 11-15 May 1992, Painatuskeskus, Helsinki, pp 105-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs GJ, Mohren GMJ (1993) Carbon fixation through forestation activities. Institute for Forestry and Nature Research Report 93/4. FACE/Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 205 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RN (1992) Forestry opportunities in the United States to mitigate effects of global warming. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 64: 157–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder P (1992) Carbon storage potential of short rotation tropical tree plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 50: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher JN (1992) Cost and performance of C02 storage in forestry projects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1:317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DA, Matthews, RW (1989) The storage of carbon in trees and timber. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 160. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, 5 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Lee JJ, Koerper GJ, Barker JR (1993) The forest sector carbon budget of the United States: carbon pools and flux under alternative policy options. US Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA/600/3-93/093. USEPA, Washington DC, 202 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM (1991) Can planted forests counteract increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide? J. Environ. Qual. 20: 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winjum JK, Dixon RK, Schroeder PE (1992) Estimating the global potential of forest and agroforest management practices to sequester carbon. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 64: 213–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matthews, R. (1996). The influence of carbon budget methodology on assessments of the impacts of forest management on the carbon balance. In: Apps, M.J., Price, D.T. (eds) Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle. NATO ASI Series, vol 40. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64699-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-61111-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics