Abstract
The prognosis for patients with breast cancer is closely related to the size and stage of the lesion at the time of diagnosis. For this reason, any technological improvement that holds promise to detect breast cancers of smaller size and at an earlier stage must be closely scrutinized. Despite improvements in ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast, x-ray mammography maintains its role as the method of choice to screen asymptomatic women to detect early-stage breast cancer (Feig 1994; Vogel 1994). The effectiveness of mammography in detecting early disease correlates closely with the image quality achieved with the specific system. Digital systems intended for mammography must thus equal the quality requirements established for conventional film-screen systems and offer significant advantages that alleviate existing shortcomings. The rapid retrieval of archived images in a digital picture archival and communications system (PACS) could be one of these improvements. The most important potential advantage, however, promises to be the implementation of computer-assisted detection (CAD) algorithms which are specifically intended for a screening situation. It is the continuous improvement of CAD techniques for mammography screening that has increased interest in digital mammography more than a decade after the first commercial systems became available (Sonoda et al. 1983).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
André, Olson L, Spivey B, Ysreal M, Tran J (1994) Full-view digital mammography with a small-field image-stitching approach: image quality and initial clinical results. Radiology 193 (P): 476
Asaga T, Chiyasu S, Mastuda S, et al. (1987) Breast imaging: dual-energy projection radiography with digital radiography. Radiology 164: 869–870
Bird R, André M, Spivey B, Horton S, Neff B, Storm J (1994) Full breast digital imaging receptor utilizing advanced optics design. Radiology 193 (P): 476
Brettle DS, Ward SC, Parkin GJ, Cowen AR, Sumsion HJ (1994) A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. Br J Radiol 67: 464–468
Chakraborty DP, Barnes GT (1989) An energy sensitive cas- sette for dual-energy mammography. Med Phys 16: 7–13
Chan H, Vyborny C, MacMahon H, Metz C, Doi K, Sickles E (1986) Evaluation of digital unsharp-mask filtering for the detection of subtle mammographic microcalcifications. SPIE medicine XIV/Pacs IV 626
Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA (1987a) Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 22: 581–589
Chan HP, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM (1987b) Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 14: 538–548
Chan H, Doi K, Vyborny C, Lam K, Schmidt R (1988) Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms: methodology and preliminary clinical study. Invest Radiol 23: 664–671
Chan H, Doi K, Vyborny C, et al. (1990) Improvement in radiologist’s detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 25: 1102–1110
De Maeseneer M, Beeckman P, Osteaux M, et al. (1992) Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms. J Belge Radiol 75: 173–178
Egan RL, Sweeney MB (1979) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer. Radiology 133: 65–76
Fam BW, Olson SL, Winter PF, Scholz FJ (1988) Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms. Radiology 169: 333–337
Feig SA (1994) Mammographic screening of women aged 40 to 49 years. Is it justified? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 21: 587–606
Fritz SL, Chang CH, Gupta NK, et al. (1986) A digital radiographic imaging system for mammography. Invest Radiol 21: 581–583
Frost M, Staab E (1989) Displays: contrast and spatial requirements. Invest Radiol 24: 95–98
Giger M, Doi K, Yin F, Schmidt R, Vyborny C (1989) Computerized classification of mass lesions in digital mammograms: lesion spiculation in analysis of malignancy. Radiology 173 (P): 394
Herman S (1988) Feature-size dependent selective edge enhancement of X-ray images. SPIE medical imaging II (914): 654–659
Holdsworth DW, Gerson RK, Fenster A (1990) A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography. Med Phys 17: 876–886
Ishida M, Frank P, Doi K, Lehr J (1983) High quality digital radiographic images: improved detection of low contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies. Radiographics 3: 325–338
Jarlman O, Samuelsson L, Braw M (1991) Digital luminescence mammography. Early clinical experience. Acta Radiol 32: 110–113
Johns PC, Drost DJ, Yaffe MJ, Fenster A (1985) Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. Med Phys 12: 297–304
Karellas A, Harris LJ, Liu H, Davis MA, D’Orsi CJ (1992) Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications. Med Phys 19: 1015–1023
Karssemeijer N, Frieling JT, Hendriks JH (1993) Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 28: 413–419
Kegelmeyer W Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML (1994) Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191: 331–337
Kimme-Smith C, Bassett L, Gold RH, Roe D, Orr R (1987) Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast. Radiology 165: 313–318
Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Gormley L (1989) Digital mammography. A comparison of two digitization methods. Invest Radiol 24: 869–875
Krupinski E (1994) Observer performance using lens-coupled vs fiberoptic-coupled digital X-ray cameras for stereotaxic breast imaging. Radiology 193 (P): 476
Lambruschi G, Tagliagambe A, Palla L, et al. (1993) A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors. Radiol Med 85: 59–64
Millis R, Davis R, Stacey A (1976) The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast. A radiological and pathological study. Br J Radiol 49: 12–26
Moskowitz M (1982) Mammographic parenchymal patterns: more controversy. JAMA 247: 210
Nab HW, Karssemeijer N, Van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH (1992) Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms. Med Inf 17: 125–131
Nishikawa RM, Mawdsley GE, Fenster A, Yaffe MJ (1987) Scanned-projection digital mammography. Med Phys 14: 717–727
Oestmann J, Kopans D, Schaefer C, et al. (1988a) Visibility of individual microcalcifications in the breast-what percentage can we expect to see? Radiology 169 (P): 352
Oestmann J, Kopans D, Linetsky L, et al. (1988b) Comparison of two screen film combinations for mammographic studies. Radiology 168: 657–659
Oestmann J, Kopans D, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Rubens JR, Greene R (1988c) A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 23: 725–728
Oestmann J, Kopans D, Hall D, McCarthy K, Rubens J, Greene R (1988d) Digitale Mammographie mit Speicher-Phosphoren: Einfluß der Bildnachverarbeitung auf die Erkennung von malignen Mikroverkalkungen. Zentralbi Rad 136: 615
Oestmann J, Kopans D, Greene R (1988e) Digitale mammographie. In: Riemann H, Kollath J, Rienhoff O (eds) 3. Frankfurter Gespräche über Digitale Radiographie. Schnetztor, Konstanz, pp 133–137
Oestmann J, Reichelt S, Rosenthal H, et al. (1989) Digital mammography with storage phosphors: substantial reductions in photon flux or voltage impair detectability of microcalcifications. Radiology 173 (P): 394
Oestmann J, Prokop M, Schaefer C, Galanski M (1991) Hardware and software artefacts in storage phosphor radiography. Radiographics 11: 795–805
Page DL, Windfield AC (1986) The dense mammogram. AJR 147: 487–489
Piccaro M (1994) Digital mammography: a step up in image quality through high resolution and scatter rejection. Radiology 193 (P): 474
Pizer S, Johnston E, Zimmermann J, Chan F (1982) Contrast perception with video displays. SPIE Medical Applications 318: 223–230
Priebe CE, Solka JL, Lorey RA, et al. (1994) The application of fractal analysis to mammographic tissue classification. Cancer Lett 77: 183–189
Prokop M, Schaefer C, Oestmann J, Galanski M (1990) Isodose dual-energy radiography with storage phosphors: fast non-linear subtraction and noise suppression with standard equipment. Radiology 177 (P): 328
Sickles E (1982) Mammographic detectability of breast calcifications. AJR 139: 913–918
Smathers RL, Bush E, Drace J, et al. (1986) Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display. Radiology 159: 673–677
Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H (1983) Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148: 833–838
St. John E, Craig D (1957) Logetronography. AJR 78:123–133
Vogel VG (1994) Screening younger women at risk for breast cancer. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:55–60
Vyborny C (1994) Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 191: 315–317
Yaffe MJ (1993) Direct digital mammography using a scanned- slot CCD imaging system. Med Prog Technol 19: 13–21
Yin FF, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Doi K, Schmidt RA (1993) Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol 28: 473–481
Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA (1994) Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Med Phys 21: 445–452
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oestmann, JW. (2000). Digital Mammography. In: Friedrich, M., Sickles, E.A. (eds) Radiological Diagnosis of Breast Diseases. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60919-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60919-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66339-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60919-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive