Abstract
It is often argued that national parks and other aspects of nature have general economic value. In saying this, the conclusion is drawn that this strong argument (economic value) can give an extra impetus to the protection possibilities of these parks. Sustainable tourism can be seen as an instrument to demonstrate this economic value. It cannot be denied that these statements are true at least in principle. The crucial question, however, is just how strong is the theoretical basis for such statements? To make clear why this is so a short overview is given of the possibilities and impossibilities of giving an economic value or a price to national parks. It can be concluded that nature and the environment are not well defined in economics; additionally the theoretical basis of value in economics is rather weak. This implies that the theoretical basis of the sustainable tourism concept cannot be stronger than the weak economic foundation. Does this mean that we do not have economic instruments to strengthen the position of national parks in the societal debate? This is not true, as can be seen from certain examples which are given. The general conclusion is that we have certain economic instruments to support the concept of sustainable tourism in national parks, but we have to be aware of the theoretical limitations of these concepts.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates (1988).The Theory of Environmental Policy. Second edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, October 3, 1966: 1–44.
Coccossis, H. and A. Parpairis (1992). Tourism and the Environment: Some Observations on the Concept of Carrying Capacity. In H. Briassoulis and J. van der Straaten (Eds.) Tourism and the EnvironmentKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 23–34
Hanley, N. and C.L. Spash (1993). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
Hoevenagel, R. (1994). The Contingent Valuation Method: Scope and ValidityInstitute for Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam.
International Union for the Conservation of Nature (1981). World Conservation Strategy. Geneva.
Linden, J.W. van der, and F.H. Oosterhuis (1988). De Maatschappelijke Waardering van Bos en Heide (The Social Valuation of Forests and Heath lands). Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. MacMillan London, UK.
Navrud, S. (1992). Pricing the European Environment, Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.
Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. MacMillan, London, UK.
Willis, K. and G.D. Garrod (1992). On-Site Recreation Surveys and Selection Effects: Valuing Open Access Recreation on Inland Waterways. In H. Briassoulis and J. van der Straaten (Eds.) Tourism and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 97–108.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van der Straaten, J. (1997). The Economic Pitfalls and Barriers of the Sustainable Tourism Concept in the Case of National Parks. In: Nelson, J.G., Serafin, R. (eds) National Parks and Protected Areas. NATO ASI Series, vol 40. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60907-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60907-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64603-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60907-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive