Skip to main content

Social choice with infinite populations: construction of a rule and impossibility results

  • Chapter

Abstract

We provide a simple construction of social choice rules for economies with infinite populations. The rules are continuous, Pareto and non-dictatorial; they are constructed as limits of individual preferences when the limit exists, and otherwise as adequate generalizations. This contrasts with the impossibility results of Arrow (1951) and Chichilnisky (1980), which are valid on economies with finitely many individuals. Our social choice rules are, however, limits of dictatorial rules. This paper was written in 1979.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baryshnikov (1993) Unifying impossibility theorems: a topological approach. Adv App Math 14: 404–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Black D (1948) The rationale of group decision-making. J Polit Econ 56: 23–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Candeal JC, Chichilnisky G, Induráin E (1997) Topological aggregation of preferences: the case of a continuum of agents. Soc Choice Welfare 14: 333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Candeal JC, Induráin E, Uriarte JR (1992) Some issues related to the topological aggregation of preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 9: 213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chichilnisky G (1976) Manifolds of Preferences and Equilibria. Report No. 27, Project on Efficiency Decision Making in Economic Systems. Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chichilnisky G (1980) Social choice and the topology of spaces of preferences. Adv Math 37(2): 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chichilnisky G (1982) Social aggregation rules and continuity. QJ Econ 1982: 337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chichilnisky G (1982) Structural instability of decisive majority rules. J Math Econ 9: 207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chichilnisky G (1982) The topological equivalence of the Pareto condition and the existence of a dictator. J Math Econ 9: 223–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chichilnisky G (1994) Social diversity, arbitrage and gains from trade: a unified perspective on resource allocation. Am Econ Rev 84(2): 427–434

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chichilnisky G (1993) On strategic control. QJ Econ 1993: 286–290

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chichilnisky G (1995) Limited arbitrage is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a competitive equilibrium. Econ Theory 5(1): 79–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chichilnisky G (1993) Markets, arbitrage and social choice. [Department of Economics, Columbia University, 1991] CORE Discussion Paper No. 9342

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chichilnisky G (1995) A Unified perspective on resource allocation: Limited arbitrage is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a competitive equilibrium, the core and social choice. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzamura K (eds) The Theory of Social choice. International Economic Association, McMillan

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chichilnisky G (1981) Markets, Games and their Topology

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chichilnisky G (1994) What is sustainable development? Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics Technical Report No. 65

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chichilnisky G, Heal GM (1983) Community preferences and social choice. J Math Econ 12: 33–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choquet G, Marsden J (1969) Lectures on Analysis. Benjamin, Amsterdam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Debreu G (1972) Smooth preferences. Econometrica 40: 603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunford N, Schwartz J (1966) Linear Operators (Part I). Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Effimov BA, Koshevoy GA (1993) The topological approach to social choice with infinite populations.Math Soc Sciences 27(2): 145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fishburn PC (1970) Arrow’s impossibility theorem, concise proof and infinite voters. J Econ Theory 2: 103–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gillman L, Jerison M (1960) Rings of Continuous Functions. Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsch MW (1977) Differential Topology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kirman A, Sondermann D (1972) Arrow’s theorem, many agents and invisible dictators. J Econ Theory 5: 267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelley J (1955) General Topology. (University Series in Higher Mathematics) Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lauwers L (1997) Infinite Chichilnisky rules. Soc Choice Welfare 14: 345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lauwers L (1997) A Note on weak ∞-rules. Soc Choice Welfare 14: 357–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lauwers L, van Liedekerke L (1993) Mono tonic Chichilnisky rules with infinite populations. Working Paper, Monitoraat E.T.E.W. Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  31. Neveu J (1965) Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of Probability. Holden Day, San Franscisco

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spanier E (1966) Algebraic Topology. (McGraw-Hill Series in Higher Mathematics) New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G. (1997). Social choice with infinite populations: construction of a rule and impossibility results. In: Heal, G.M. (eds) Topological Social Choice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60891-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60891-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64599-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60891-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics